The Trump Women and their Fashion Mishaps - Part Three

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This is the best detail I have found of Melania's xmas eve dress

She is speaking with kids. She is so happy when she is around children.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This is the best detail I have found of Melania's xmas eve dress

Frumpy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I have fewer under eye wrinkles than that and I am 75.
She must be a natural blonde with sun damage in her youth. I have my Gallego dad's thick creamy white skin. When I got facials in my 40s they said I had "good skin" and I didn't know what they meant. Now I do. But I do have lines around my mouth.

For God's sake, no you do not.

If any of us had a close up taken in light as harsh as that and then the photographer adjusted the photo to emphasize those lines then yes, we'd all look like this. Even at 30 or 35.

+1
The photo was *very deliberately* set up and taken. And then, of course, published.

Why would she allow that?

Because she is lacking in knowledge.

Also not his fault she has needle holes in her face.

Here’s the thing with LEAVITT’s photo. He focused on her lips because she is Trump’s mouthpiece. I can’t believe no one here has made that connection yet. How clueless are you people?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s not a great look on Bettina. Dress or bow. I think Usha Vance has a better shape and is doing better style wise than the other Trumpistas right now.

Of course you do.

Dude. I am mixed race, not Desi, don’t live in the DMV, and hate her politics. Please be less of a snotty idiot. I’m not a fan but genuinely think she looks far better than most in Trumpworld.

+1
There's an idiot (or three) on this thread who throw tantrums whenever anyone says anything positive about Usha Vance. They have serious issues.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Omg. She is sharing the books she loves and supposedly read next to a photo of her reading while wearing a DRESS? Holy fakeness!

She is whacked!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is the best detail I have found of Melania's xmas eve dress

She is speaking with kids. She is so happy when she is around children.

+1

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I have fewer under eye wrinkles than that and I am 75.
She must be a natural blonde with sun damage in her youth. I have my Gallego dad's thick creamy white skin. When I got facials in my 40s they said I had "good skin" and I didn't know what they meant. Now I do. But I do have lines around my mouth.

For God's sake, no you do not.

If any of us had a close up taken in light as harsh as that and then the photographer adjusted the photo to emphasize those lines then yes, we'd all look like this. Even at 30 or 35.

+1
The photo was *very deliberately* set up and taken. And then, of course, published.

Why would she allow that?

Because she is lacking in knowledge.

Also not his fault she has needle holes in her face.

Here’s the thing with LEAVITT’s photo. He focused on her lips because she is Trump’s mouthpiece. I can’t believe no one here has made that connection yet. How clueless are you people?

Nice try defending a man who denigrated pregnant woman. Are you a guy or just a woman who hate other women?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I have fewer under eye wrinkles than that and I am 75.
She must be a natural blonde with sun damage in her youth. I have my Gallego dad's thick creamy white skin. When I got facials in my 40s they said I had "good skin" and I didn't know what they meant. Now I do. But I do have lines around my mouth.

For God's sake, no you do not.

If any of us had a close up taken in light as harsh as that and then the photographer adjusted the photo to emphasize those lines then yes, we'd all look like this. Even at 30 or 35.

+1
The photo was *very deliberately* set up and taken. And then, of course, published.

Why would she allow that?

Because she is lacking in knowledge.

Also not his fault she has needle holes in her face.

Here’s the thing with LEAVITT’s photo. He focused on her lips because she is Trump’s mouthpiece. I can’t believe no one here has made that connection yet. How clueless are you people?

Nice try defending a man who denigrated pregnant woman. Are you a guy or just a woman who hate other women?

I doubt she was pregnant when the photo was taken. And if she was, he didn’t know. Furthermore, if she was pregnant at the time of the photo, she shouldn’t be getting crap injected into her body.

I totally agree with the mouthpiece interpretation.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I have fewer under eye wrinkles than that and I am 75.
She must be a natural blonde with sun damage in her youth. I have my Gallego dad's thick creamy white skin. When I got facials in my 40s they said I had "good skin" and I didn't know what they meant. Now I do. But I do have lines around my mouth.

For God's sake, no you do not.

If any of us had a close up taken in light as harsh as that and then the photographer adjusted the photo to emphasize those lines then yes, we'd all look like this. Even at 30 or 35.

+1
The photo was *very deliberately* set up and taken. And then, of course, published.

Why would she allow that?

Because she is lacking in knowledge.

Also not his fault she has needle holes in her face.

Here’s the thing with LEAVITT’s photo. He focused on her lips because she is Trump’s mouthpiece. I can’t believe no one here has made that connection yet. How clueless are you people?

Nice try defending a man who denigrated pregnant woman. Are you a guy or just a woman who hate other women?

I doubt she was pregnant when the photo was taken. And if she was, he didn’t know. Furthermore, if she was pregnant at the time of the photo, she shouldn’t be getting crap injected into her body.

I totally agree with the mouthpiece interpretation.

She has been visibly pregnant for the last two months, and she already knows the gender of the baby, so not newly pregnant. He surely knew she was pregnant back when he took photo.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I have fewer under eye wrinkles than that and I am 75.
She must be a natural blonde with sun damage in her youth. I have my Gallego dad's thick creamy white skin. When I got facials in my 40s they said I had "good skin" and I didn't know what they meant. Now I do. But I do have lines around my mouth.

For God's sake, no you do not.

If any of us had a close up taken in light as harsh as that and then the photographer adjusted the photo to emphasize those lines then yes, we'd all look like this. Even at 30 or 35.

+1
The photo was *very deliberately* set up and taken. And then, of course, published.

Why would she allow that?

Because she is lacking in knowledge.

Also not his fault she has needle holes in her face.

Here’s the thing with LEAVITT’s photo. He focused on her lips because she is Trump’s mouthpiece. I can’t believe no one here has made that connection yet. How clueless are you people?

Nice try defending a man who denigrated pregnant woman. Are you a guy or just a woman who hate other women?

This administration doesn't care about pregnant women.

Why should we?

Nice of you to hold an internet stranger to higher standards than you hold the POTUS.

I don't know who do you mean under "this administration", it is always action of one person. The person above justified the man treating pregnant woman poorly. Why should you care or not depends on your own values, believes and upbringing. Anyone who support this photographer hates women. There is no higher standard in respecting a woman for a fact that she is a woman, especially when she is pregnant. This is a basic common sense.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I have fewer under eye wrinkles than that and I am 75.
She must be a natural blonde with sun damage in her youth. I have my Gallego dad's thick creamy white skin. When I got facials in my 40s they said I had "good skin" and I didn't know what they meant. Now I do. But I do have lines around my mouth.

For God's sake, no you do not.

If any of us had a close up taken in light as harsh as that and then the photographer adjusted the photo to emphasize those lines then yes, we'd all look like this. Even at 30 or 35.

+1
The photo was *very deliberately* set up and taken. And then, of course, published.

Why would she allow that?

Because she is lacking in knowledge.

Also not his fault she has needle holes in her face.

Here’s the thing with LEAVITT’s photo. He focused on her lips because she is Trump’s mouthpiece. I can’t believe no one here has made that connection yet. How clueless are you people?

Nice try defending a man who denigrated pregnant woman. Are you a guy or just a woman who hate other women?

This administration doesn't care about pregnant women.

Why should we?

Nice of you to hold an internet stranger to higher standards than you hold the POTUS.

I don't know who do you mean under "this administration", it is always action of one person. The person above justified the man treating pregnant woman poorly. Why should you care or not depends on your own values, believes and upbringing. Anyone who support this photographer hates women. There is no higher standard in respecting a woman for a fact that she is a woman, especially when she is pregnant. This is a basic common sense.

How did he treat her poorly? I think it's a beautiful picture, she looks great and her injector did a nice job. Are you calling a pregnant woman ugly? Yikes. KInd of a shitty thing to say.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I have fewer under eye wrinkles than that and I am 75.
She must be a natural blonde with sun damage in her youth. I have my Gallego dad's thick creamy white skin. When I got facials in my 40s they said I had "good skin" and I didn't know what they meant. Now I do. But I do have lines around my mouth.

For God's sake, no you do not.

If any of us had a close up taken in light as harsh as that and then the photographer adjusted the photo to emphasize those lines then yes, we'd all look like this. Even at 30 or 35.

+1
The photo was *very deliberately* set up and taken. And then, of course, published.

Why would she allow that?

Because she is lacking in knowledge.

Also not his fault she has needle holes in her face.

Here’s the thing with LEAVITT’s photo. He focused on her lips because she is Trump’s mouthpiece. I can’t believe no one here has made that connection yet. How clueless are you people?

Nice try defending a man who denigrated pregnant woman. Are you a guy or just a woman who hate other women?

you can try to sell this line but it's not going to work. He did a Dorian Grey.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I have fewer under eye wrinkles than that and I am 75.
She must be a natural blonde with sun damage in her youth. I have my Gallego dad's thick creamy white skin. When I got facials in my 40s they said I had "good skin" and I didn't know what they meant. Now I do. But I do have lines around my mouth.

For God's sake, no you do not.

If any of us had a close up taken in light as harsh as that and then the photographer adjusted the photo to emphasize those lines then yes, we'd all look like this. Even at 30 or 35.

+1
The photo was *very deliberately* set up and taken. And then, of course, published.

Why would she allow that?

Because she is lacking in knowledge.

Also not his fault she has needle holes in her face.

Here’s the thing with LEAVITT’s photo. He focused on her lips because she is Trump’s mouthpiece. I can’t believe no one here has made that connection yet. How clueless are you people?

Nice try defending a man who denigrated pregnant woman. Are you a guy or just a woman who hate other women?

I doubt she was pregnant when the photo was taken. And if she was, he didn’t know. Furthermore, if she was pregnant at the time of the photo, she shouldn’t be getting crap injected into her body.

I totally agree with the mouthpiece interpretation.

She has been visibly pregnant for the last two months, and she already knows the gender of the baby, so not newly pregnant. He surely knew she was pregnant back when he took photo.

She has not been visibly pregnant for the last two months. Good lord.

And you can find out the gender as early as 12 weeks. Who are you people?

The pic is intentionally unflattering and photog was an a-hole but I doubt he knew she was pregnant.

[Anonymous]

Why does pregnant excuse injection holes?

[Anonymous]