Meghan Markle and Prince Harry News and Updates

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Give it up losers. You've lost a war you didn't even realize was happening.

Two misandrists and a further feminization of the US. Men shouldn’t register to vote?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Does it make anyone else uneasy that meghans latest thing about urging women to vote has her name “Meghan, duchess of Sussex” underneath her pic?

I just don’t think a “royal” of another country should be inserting themselves into our politics however well intentioned. I understand she’s just campaigning For people to vote, not supporting a political platform per se... but still.

Did she renounce e her US citizenship. When she married Harry or just her Roman Catholicism?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Again, we don't need Meghan's help with anything and certainly aren't soliciting it.

She's your cousin's annoying girlfriend who keeps making up tasks for herself at the baby shower and welcoming guests who don't know who she is.

yes yes yes -- hilarious and spot on

+1

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She doesn't get it, she wants her public persona to be as a celebrity who deals with meaningful change and increased social awareness. But society does not WANT her in that role. She is not in a position to improve lives by "using her platform" or "lending her name" to causes. No one is asking her to show up on a global let alone an American stage to promote good.

At least Harry was invited to acts of service. And even now he is working on the Invictus Games with other organizers.

If Meghan was really about helping others she would stop trying to put herself out there and promote her name/face alongside the causes.

Do we really need the invictus games?

I understand the importance of the olympics and the special olympics; I’m not convinced we need the invictus games...since it mostly seems like a platform for Harry and an opportunity to misuse funds.

The Invictus games are nothing more than a front for lining the pocket of British aristocracy. They are hiding behind the shield of wounded veterans which is below despicable. They blatantly abused our troops when they first landed in the U.S., getting all kinds of free U.S. taxpayer Defense Department support. We don't allow it for U.S. charities, why Invictus games? Because of pressure by the lofty royal and sycophants wanting to rub shoulders and kiss up to them.

The DoD already had their official warrior games and didn't need Invictus. Harry was just copying a program already in place as a foil to make money via a "nonprofit" and make himself look good. Anything this guy (or Meghan) does with military should be looked at with a crooked eye and investigated.

"The Warrior Games have taken place annually since 2010. It was created by the United States Olympic Committee and hosted through 2014 at the U.S. Olympic and Paralympic Training Center in Colorado Springs, Colorado.[2][3] Britain's Prince Harry, at the time serving as a Captain and helicopter pilot in the British Army, opened the 2013 Games,[4] which inspired him to create the Invictus Games, an international counterpart to the Warrior Games with national representations.[5]"

^ And it wouldn't surprise me if they see Invictus as a cash cow for paying the mortgage on that new mansion of theirs. You know, writing it off as non-profit expenditures. Sickening. I hope someone follows their money.

Curious as to how they make money off the invictus games?

Sponsorships and merchandise, tv rights

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Does it make anyone else uneasy that meghans latest thing about urging women to vote has her name “Meghan, duchess of Sussex” underneath her pic?

I just don’t think a “royal” of another country should be inserting themselves into our politics however well intentioned. I understand she’s just campaigning For people to vote, not supporting a political platform per se... but still.

Did she renounce e her US citizenship. When she married Harry or just her Roman Catholicism?

Lol

No, of course she didn't. But she has torpedoed her application for British citizenship.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Again, we don't need Meghan's help with anything and certainly aren't soliciting it.

She's your cousin's annoying girlfriend who keeps making up tasks for herself at the baby shower and welcoming guests who don't know who she is.

yes yes yes -- hilarious and spot on

+1

+2

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Give it up losers. You've lost a war you didn't even realize was happening.

Wow! Is there space in the whole USA for those two egos?

Oh stop - Meghan shouldn’t even be in the same picture with Michelle. Michelle is a brilliant double ivy lawyer who is accomplished in her own right. Meghan is an actress who plagiarizes speeches and failed the state department foreign service exam.

There is no way Michelle's team reached out to Meghan, this smells like Meghan (hiding behind Harry's connection with former US administration) mentioned that she would be honored and thrilled to team up with Michelle and help get the vote out and the Obama people diplomatically agreed.

But I could be wrong. Meghan has a lot of pull in the underrepresented communities.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She doesn't get it, she wants her public persona to be as a celebrity who deals with meaningful change and increased social awareness. But society does not WANT her in that role. She is not in a position to improve lives by "using her platform" or "lending her name" to causes. No one is asking her to show up on a global let alone an American stage to promote good.

At least Harry was invited to acts of service. And even now he is working on the Invictus Games with other organizers.

If Meghan was really about helping others she would stop trying to put herself out there and promote her name/face alongside the causes.

Do we really need the invictus games?

I understand the importance of the olympics and the special olympics; I’m not convinced we need the invictus games...since it mostly seems like a platform for Harry and an opportunity to misuse funds.

The Invictus games are nothing more than a front for lining the pocket of British aristocracy. They are hiding behind the shield of wounded veterans which is below despicable. They blatantly abused our troops when they first landed in the U.S., getting all kinds of free U.S. taxpayer Defense Department support. We don't allow it for U.S. charities, why Invictus games? Because of pressure by the lofty royal and sycophants wanting to rub shoulders and kiss up to them.

The DoD already had their official warrior games and didn't need Invictus. Harry was just copying a program already in place as a foil to make money via a "nonprofit" and make himself look good. Anything this guy (or Meghan) does with military should be looked at with a crooked eye and investigated.

"The Warrior Games have taken place annually since 2010. It was created by the United States Olympic Committee and hosted through 2014 at the U.S. Olympic and Paralympic Training Center in Colorado Springs, Colorado.[2][3] Britain's Prince Harry, at the time serving as a Captain and helicopter pilot in the British Army, opened the 2013 Games,[4] which inspired him to create the Invictus Games, an international counterpart to the Warrior Games with national representations.[5]"

^ And it wouldn't surprise me if they see Invictus as a cash cow for paying the mortgage on that new mansion of theirs. You know, writing it off as non-profit expenditures. Sickening. I hope someone follows their money.

Curious as to how they make money off the invictus games?

Sponsorships and merchandise, tv rights

And cash donations from unsuspecting private foundations, corporations, other non-profits, etc. Since it's an overseas charity it is probably not registered here and would be difficult for the IRS to follow. Who knows, maybe that might make it easier to launder money. For all we know, H&M may be drawing multi-million dollar "salaries" for their roles in Invictus.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She doesn't get it, she wants her public persona to be as a celebrity who deals with meaningful change and increased social awareness. But society does not WANT her in that role. She is not in a position to improve lives by "using her platform" or "lending her name" to causes. No one is asking her to show up on a global let alone an American stage to promote good.

At least Harry was invited to acts of service. And even now he is working on the Invictus Games with other organizers.

If Meghan was really about helping others she would stop trying to put herself out there and promote her name/face alongside the causes.

Do we really need the invictus games?

I understand the importance of the olympics and the special olympics; I’m not convinced we need the invictus games...since it mostly seems like a platform for Harry and an opportunity to misuse funds.

The Invictus games are nothing more than a front for lining the pocket of British aristocracy. They are hiding behind the shield of wounded veterans which is below despicable. They blatantly abused our troops when they first landed in the U.S., getting all kinds of free U.S. taxpayer Defense Department support. We don't allow it for U.S. charities, why Invictus games? Because of pressure by the lofty royal and sycophants wanting to rub shoulders and kiss up to them.

The DoD already had their official warrior games and didn't need Invictus. Harry was just copying a program already in place as a foil to make money via a "nonprofit" and make himself look good. Anything this guy (or Meghan) does with military should be looked at with a crooked eye and investigated.

"The Warrior Games have taken place annually since 2010. It was created by the United States Olympic Committee and hosted through 2014 at the U.S. Olympic and Paralympic Training Center in Colorado Springs, Colorado.[2][3] Britain's Prince Harry, at the time serving as a Captain and helicopter pilot in the British Army, opened the 2013 Games,[4] which inspired him to create the Invictus Games, an international counterpart to the Warrior Games with national representations.[5]"

^ And it wouldn't surprise me if they see Invictus as a cash cow for paying the mortgage on that new mansion of theirs. You know, writing it off as non-profit expenditures. Sickening. I hope someone follows their money.

Curious as to how they make money off the invictus games?

Sponsorships and merchandise, tv rights

And cash donations from unsuspecting private foundations, corporations, other non-profits, etc. Since it's an overseas charity it is probably not registered here and would be difficult for the IRS to follow. Who knows, maybe that might make it easier to launder money. For all we know, H&M may be drawing multi-million dollar "salaries" for their roles in Invictus.

PP. You are probably right about the sponsorships, merchandise, tv rights. But the rest of this sounds like a rejected breaking bad plot.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She doesn't get it, she wants her public persona to be as a celebrity who deals with meaningful change and increased social awareness. But society does not WANT her in that role. She is not in a position to improve lives by "using her platform" or "lending her name" to causes. No one is asking her to show up on a global let alone an American stage to promote good.

At least Harry was invited to acts of service. And even now he is working on the Invictus Games with other organizers.

If Meghan was really about helping others she would stop trying to put herself out there and promote her name/face alongside the causes.

Do we really need the invictus games?

I understand the importance of the olympics and the special olympics; I’m not convinced we need the invictus games...since it mostly seems like a platform for Harry and an opportunity to misuse funds.

The Invictus games are nothing more than a front for lining the pocket of British aristocracy. They are hiding behind the shield of wounded veterans which is below despicable. They blatantly abused our troops when they first landed in the U.S., getting all kinds of free U.S. taxpayer Defense Department support. We don't allow it for U.S. charities, why Invictus games? Because of pressure by the lofty royal and sycophants wanting to rub shoulders and kiss up to them.

The DoD already had their official warrior games and didn't need Invictus. Harry was just copying a program already in place as a foil to make money via a "nonprofit" and make himself look good. Anything this guy (or Meghan) does with military should be looked at with a crooked eye and investigated.

"The Warrior Games have taken place annually since 2010. It was created by the United States Olympic Committee and hosted through 2014 at the U.S. Olympic and Paralympic Training Center in Colorado Springs, Colorado.[2][3] Britain's Prince Harry, at the time serving as a Captain and helicopter pilot in the British Army, opened the 2013 Games,[4] which inspired him to create the Invictus Games, an international counterpart to the Warrior Games with national representations.[5]"

^ And it wouldn't surprise me if they see Invictus as a cash cow for paying the mortgage on that new mansion of theirs. You know, writing it off as non-profit expenditures. Sickening. I hope someone follows their money.

Curious as to how they make money off the invictus games?

Sponsorships and merchandise, tv rights

And cash donations from unsuspecting private foundations, corporations, other non-profits, etc. Since it's an overseas charity it is probably not registered here and would be difficult for the IRS to follow. Who knows, maybe that might make it easier to launder money. For all we know, H&M may be drawing multi-million dollar "salaries" for their roles in Invictus.

PP. You are probably right about the sponsorships, merchandise, tv rights. But the rest of this sounds like a rejected breaking bad plot.

If it sounds like a bad plot to you it's probably because it's too real. Happens all the time. In the news right now as a matter of fact:

"The four men were indicted for allegedly using hundreds of thousands of dollars donated to an online crowdfunding campaign called We Build the Wall for personal expenses, among other things. Bannon and another defendant, Brian Kolfage, promised donors that the campaign, which ultimately raised more than $25 million, was "a volunteer organization" and that "100% of the funds raised...will be used in the execution of our mission and purpose," according to the indictment unsealed Thursday.

But instead, according to prosecutors, Bannon, through a non-profit under his control, used more than $1 million from We Build the Wall to "secretly" pay Kolfage and cover hundreds of thousands of dollars in Bannon's personal expenses."

https://www.cnn.com/2020/08/20/politics/bannon-build-the-wall-indictment/index.html


Kolfage, according to the charges, spent more than $350,000 of the donations on personal expenses, including cosmetic surgery, a luxury SUV, a golf cart, payments toward a boat, home renovations, jewelry, personal tax payments and credit card debt.

[Anonymous]

https://twitter.com/byQueenVic/status/1296771925671387137

Meghan and Harry bring their own photographer to a volunteer day

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:https://twitter.com/byQueenVic/status/1296771925671387137

Meghan and Harry bring their own photographer to a volunteer day

If a tree falls in a forest.....

[Anonymous]

So much obvious self-promotion for two people who claim to want privacy. I thought the Brits hated hypocrisy more than anything yet their beloved Prince is a walking, talking hypocrite and his thirsty wife is no better.

[Anonymous]

Meghan is all about branding herself - that's why she's reaching out to Michelle and Oprah and other powerful people. And before it was nuclear, guess who else she was reaching out to, who was conveniently omitted from the Scobie book?

Ivanka Trump.

In her now-defunct blog,The Tig, the Duchess gushed about her new friendship with Donald Trump’s “staggeringly beautiful” and “intelligent” daughter.

“When we have drinks, I will make sure I order whatever she does – because this woman seems to have the formula for success (and happiness) down pat,” Meghan wrote.

“Don’t get me started on her jewellery collection: The late-night ‘window shopping’ I have done on my computer, snuggled up in bed with a glass of wine, staring longingly at her beautiful designs.”

Oooh.

[Anonymous]

Ugh.