The President is Above the Law

Anonymous
There is so much hyperbole on this thread. Incredible.

Lots of chicken littles out there.

And, Sotomayor's hyperbolic dissent didn't help. She is proving herself to be not very smart.

Anonymous
The fact that one side is salivating at the thought that they could have a candidate be king while the other side is heartbroken because of what it means for democracy and this country is all you really need to know about who you should vote for this election.... I'm talking up and down the ticket not just the president.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:There is so much hyperbole on this thread. Incredible.

Lots of chicken littles out there.

And, Sotomayor's hyperbolic dissent didn't help. She is proving herself to be not very smart.



Yep, just these silly liberals catastrophesing things just like they did when they said abortion and roe v Wade would be overturned.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Biden is speaking on this decision tonight. Wonder how many lies he will tell about what this ruling covers?


I don't think it was forceful enough. He should have said I can do this, this and that, but I will not. At least not right now.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The entire DOJ prosecution is illegal because Jack Smith can't be appointed by the Attorney General. It was always egregious given the plain language of the Appointments Clause, but the idea that the DOJ can, by fiat, create a position rescinded by Congresss is absurd.

All you folks worried about "King" Trump should look in the mirror because the Dems are the ones taking unilateral action not authorized by the Constitution.

Trump is a clown but he's no tyrant. Whoever follows Trump may be.


Well now, according to the Supreme Court, Biden can't be prosecuted for official acts. And president following can't be prosecuted for official acts.

Not sure the GOP and donors thought this out too well.


They are counting on Biden AND ALL FUTURE DEMS being wimps and living by the "When they go low, we go high."
They are betting that we are all upright citizens who will play by the rules. And, looks like they may be right. Someone really smart needs to be at the helm at this moment in time. Someone with cojones.


Exactly. I said this earlier in the thread. They know the Democrats will "be the bigger person" and not test the ruling.

If true, be prepared for the next step. I hope you chickenshit Dems have enough balls to at the very least protect yourselves when the guns coming pointing in your direction.


What guns?

If you have not figured that out by now, you are too late.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I'd be fascinated to see how this court would rule under a radical progressive president who attempts to assassinate his opponents and openly take bribes. I am also tired of justices pretending they're historians and have any good thumb on the history of this country-follow plain text if you want to be originalists but don't conjure up convenient analyses of history


Neither of these actions is covered by this ruling. Those are not "official" duties. Those are crimes, regardless of who is doing them.


If a crime has no enforcement possibility then is it really a crime?


Crime absolutely has enforcement possibility.
Tell me exactly how assassinating Justices on SCOTUS is an official act.


Not sure about that one but the bribery for official acts seems unenforceable if the the official act part of the scheme is not admissable.


Bribery is illegal and not an official act.


Yes. But the enforcement. If you can't present any evidence that the bribe was in exchange for an official act it is unenforceable. And if it is unenforceable, than so what if you call it a crime.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:The fact that one side is salivating at the thought that they could have a candidate be king while the other side is heartbroken because of what it means for democracy and this country is all you really need to know about who you should vote for this election.... I'm talking up and down the ticket not just the president.


Oh give it a rest. We’ve been rightly saying that the media and DNC has been lying about a lot of things over the past several years from Covid to Russia and now Biden’s state of mind. And we have been right. You say you fear for our democracy; well having a political party keeping such important information about Biden from voters is not democracy, it’s oligarchy.

Maybe start listening to the other side of the aisle and aim for some common ground instead of the dark demonization.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:There is so much hyperbole on this thread. Incredible.

Lots of chicken littles out there.

And, Sotomayor's hyperbolic dissent didn't help. She is proving herself to be not very smart.


Aww sweetie you are gaslighting again. That's what yall said about women's reproduction rights and people said, "yeah maybe I'm overreacting". Wrong. Now
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The fact that one side is salivating at the thought that they could have a candidate be king while the other side is heartbroken because of what it means for democracy and this country is all you really need to know about who you should vote for this election.... I'm talking up and down the ticket not just the president.


Oh give it a rest. We’ve been rightly saying that the media and DNC has been lying about a lot of things over the past several years from Covid to Russia and now Biden’s state of mind. And we have been right. You say you fear for our democracy; well having a political party keeping such important information about Biden from voters is not democracy, it’s oligarchy.

Maybe start listening to the other side of the aisle and aim for some common ground instead of the dark demonization.


Give it a rest. We were all here for January 6th. We did not see the good old counting up of the electoral votes. That did not happen the way it is supposed to happen. Don't treat me like a moron even if you want to act like one.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Biden is speaking on this decision tonight. Wonder how many lies he will tell about what this ruling covers?


I don't think it was forceful enough. He should have said I can do this, this and that, but I will not. At least not right now.


Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The fact that one side is salivating at the thought that they could have a candidate be king while the other side is heartbroken because of what it means for democracy and this country is all you really need to know about who you should vote for this election.... I'm talking up and down the ticket not just the president.


Oh give it a rest. We’ve been rightly saying that the media and DNC has been lying about a lot of things over the past several years from Covid to Russia and now Biden’s state of mind. And we have been right. You say you fear for our democracy; well having a political party keeping such important information about Biden from voters is not democracy, it’s oligarchy.

Maybe start listening to the other side of the aisle and aim for some common ground instead of the dark demonization.

Nope. Never dance with the devil and his spawns.
Anonymous
Ok, can Joe do whatever he wants to Don?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The fact that one side is salivating at the thought that they could have a candidate be king while the other side is heartbroken because of what it means for democracy and this country is all you really need to know about who you should vote for this election.... I'm talking up and down the ticket not just the president.


Oh give it a rest. We’ve been rightly saying that the media and DNC has been lying about a lot of things over the past several years from Covid to Russia and now Biden’s state of mind. And we have been right. You say you fear for our democracy; well having a political party keeping such important information about Biden from voters is not democracy, it’s oligarchy.

Maybe start listening to the other side of the aisle and aim for some common ground instead of the dark demonization.

Nope. Never dance with the devil and his spawns.


Enjoy the loss.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:There is so much hyperbole on this thread. Incredible.

Lots of chicken littles out there.

And, Sotomayor's hyperbolic dissent didn't help. She is proving herself to be not very smart.



Trumps attorney admitted this was implication of his position during oral arguments.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Biden is speaking on this decision tonight. Wonder how many lies he will tell about what this ruling covers?


I don't think it was forceful enough. He should have said I can do this, this and that, but I will not. At least not right now.



No respect.
This court is a banana republic court. Their decisions are based on the highest payer.
post reply Forum Index » Political Discussion
Message Quick Reply
Go to: