The Trump Women and their Fashion Mishaps - Part Three

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Gorgeous dress! She looks beautiful.

I love this dress. I just googled it to see the price and it appears it’s only available used on poshmark. Is she not buying dresses new for these big events?

She has that friend whose mom owns a boutique in New Jersey and the friend sends clothes from there. I would imagine this was past season Milly from the sale rack. Beautiful dress in a small size so I'm surprised it made it to the sale rack but someone's loss was certainly Usha's gain.

That would also make sense because I doubt the friend's mom is going to put aside the brand new, full price stuff to send to Usha. It's not like she would get the credit for it. When Usha's outfits get reported on by this one creepy twitter account, they credit Milly, not the boutique.

It's probably older stuff she can take a loss on and Usha pays a heavy discount.

Why do you think our British poster is 'creepy'? I'm not arguing she's not just curious why you think she is. I only post her photos b/c I can only poster twitter pics and Usha is rarely photographed.

Oh I don’t think you’re creepy for using her pics to be clear. I think she’s creepy because she’s freakishly obsessed with Kate Middleton, Melania, and Usha. And then had a weird tweet about “our dear princess charlotte.” “Our” about a child she’s never met lol.

She’s also not British, she’s American. She’s tweeted about being American and how Melania is our own Kate Middleton lmao

[Anonymous]

https://www.huffpost.com/entry/karoline-leavitt-vanity-fair-photo-face-lips_l_69430b2ee4b045d9788c9e8b?origin=home-life-unit

All our questions answered from professionals. It sounds like she didnt have an artful injector and it was a "picket fence" job

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The lip injection bruises on Karoline, woof. Her injector hates her.

I'm surprised they could find a lip to inject

She looks like a cute, normal girl in this picture.

People used to look like this, and have idiosyncrasies like smallish lips, and we could still call them attractive because they looked like regular humans.

Hot take I think she is still attractive.

I'm a few years older than Karoline but I think a lot of these "She's 28, I'm 35 and I look better" memes underestimate how unflattering that close-up-under-harsh-lights was. The lip injections were gross but other than that I see some visible pores (normal), some textured patches (normal), and a couple undereye lines (normal for late 20s/early 30s, especially fair skinned women like us). It didn't help that she had heavy makeup on, which you would too if you thought you were getting photographed for a national magazine at normal range.

I'm 32. I go to one of the better dermatologists in DC, and I go quarterly. I have been using Vitamin C and tretinoin daily since my mid-20s. My new coworker just told me she thought I was 28. I think my skin looks good. I still think I would fare poorly under the conditions Karoline was photographed under.

Btw, the feminist in me is pissed off that she's the ONLY one whose appearance we are talking about. Not that of JD Vance, who looks 50 when he's 41. Not that of Stephen Miller who looks like the swamp creature he is. We are literally only talking about the young woman.

You genuinely think this is the normal amount of wrinkles for under 35? I am 45 and would love this kind of photo taken of my skin to see what I might be missing, just wouldn't want it published

I hate this entire administration but this is unfair. Nobody looks good this close up.

This is not just a close up photo. This is a photo where the photographer deliberately set up sharp cold tone light - direct into her face and slightly above, the light that churns any make up into the mud; the light that gives the shadow from every slight wrinkle; the light that gives the skin a dead man shade. The photographer ignored diffusor and reflectors, probably stretched diaphragm (like during architectural photoshoot), to ensure that every pore on Karoline's face highlighted like Mariana Trench, that every spot on her skin looks like melanoma. No retouching, of course. But he added contrast and texture, just like a control shot.

There are rules for the portrait photography - soft, filtered side light (better the warmer than day light), reflector from the bottom to ensure that under eye wrinkles are softened, wide diaphragm, correct lensed. When professional make a portrait, he can remove 10-12 years from the face even without photoshop. But he can also add 10-12 years.

The fact that he didn't just do a close up photo, but put efforts to make her look this way for the sole purpose to humiliate the women is disgusting. But he is a man. What puzzles me the most that other women are buying this lie and keep humiliating this woman. We should be better regardless of our political views, and expose this "photographer" for what he has done.

Yeah, I posted above about how I think I look good for my age but would fare as poorly as Karo did here and I agree with this. I'm sick of seeing women be like, "This is Karoline's 28 and this is me at 35. Being evil ages you." Like, one, they rarely don't look great either. And two, if they do, they're using filters and the camera isn't right in their face.

And again, NO ONE is talking about the men who actually do look like shit for their ages. JD is 41 and has worse crow's feet and nasolabial folds than my father, who is 62. Btw, very telling that most of the men's close ups were shot in black and white and the young woman got literally the harshest lighting imaginable.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:For those who really want to be creeped out. If you click the link, it's pg. 3

So does this mean Jeffrey Epstein had a bunch of teen glamour shots of Ivanka, of all people?

And JFC how early were they letting this kid get plastic surgery??

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Gorgeous dress! She looks beautiful.

I love this dress. I just googled it to see the price and it appears it’s only available used on poshmark. Is she not buying dresses new for these big events?

She probably already owned it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Gorgeous dress! She looks beautiful.

I love this dress. I just googled it to see the price and it appears it’s only available used on poshmark. Is she not buying dresses new for these big events?

The dress is stunning and so appropriate for the event. She might bought it new a few years ago and just re-using. It is totally appropriate to wear the outfits several times, she is not a runaway model.

Agreed. I like it even more if she is indeed rewearing it. And the color is beautiful, not only for Hanukkah but also on her.

[Anonymous]

I want to give the Trumps the benefit of the doubt on the Ivanka stuff. Is it possible Donald gave him that picture just in a "Look how beautiful my daughter is" kind of way? My mom definitely sent our high school portraits to like, her childless siblings and even more extended family who probably didn't give a shit. My dad wouldn't have given them to business associates or friends, but Donald is super weird and frankly, awkward at social interactions. Maybe he was just like "Yeah, this is normal"?

Idk, I am really, really trying to believe even Donald's creepy ass wouldn't give a picture of his teenage daughter to a sex predator for lewd and lascivious purposes.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:For those who really want to be creeped out. If you click the link, it's pg. 3

So does this mean Jeffrey Epstein had a bunch of teen glamour shots of Ivanka, of all people?

And JFC how early were they letting this kid get plastic surgery??

This is a pic of Donald and Ivanka taken in January 1999 according to the timestamp on the page: https://www.alamy.com/donald-and-ivanka-trump-circa-1999-credit-ron-wolfson-rock-negatives-mediapunch-image458900426.html

The nose looks pre-plastic surgery and she would've been 18 in 1999. I am wondering if the pic of her in the files is her as a college student? Still creepy but at least not a child.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:For those who really want to be creeped out. If you click the link, it's pg. 3

So does this mean Jeffrey Epstein had a bunch of teen glamour shots of Ivanka, of all people?

And JFC how early were they letting this kid get plastic surgery??

This is a pic of Donald and Ivanka taken in January 1999 according to the timestamp on the page: https://www.alamy.com/donald-and-ivanka-trump-circa-1999-credit-ron-wolfson-rock-negatives-mediapunch-image458900426.html

The nose looks pre-plastic surgery and she would've been 18 in 1999. I am wondering if the pic of her in the files is her as a college student? Still creepy but at least not a child.

The face is redacted in the justice.gov files. How many are Ivanka??

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:For those who really want to be creeped out. If you click the link, it's pg. 3

So does this mean Jeffrey Epstein had a bunch of teen glamour shots of Ivanka, of all people?

And JFC how early were they letting this kid get plastic surgery??

This is a pic of Donald and Ivanka taken in January 1999 according to the timestamp on the page: https://www.alamy.com/donald-and-ivanka-trump-circa-1999-credit-ron-wolfson-rock-negatives-mediapunch-image458900426.html

The nose looks pre-plastic surgery and she would've been 18 in 1999. I am wondering if the pic of her in the files is her as a college student? Still creepy but at least not a child.

The face is redacted in the justice.gov files. How many are Ivanka??

I think just the one on Pg. 3 that someone matched to a pic of Ivanka.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:For those who really want to be creeped out. If you click the link, it's pg. 3

So does this mean Jeffrey Epstein had a bunch of teen glamour shots of Ivanka, of all people?

And JFC how early were they letting this kid get plastic surgery??

This is a pic of Donald and Ivanka taken in January 1999 according to the timestamp on the page: https://www.alamy.com/donald-and-ivanka-trump-circa-1999-credit-ron-wolfson-rock-negatives-mediapunch-image458900426.html

The nose looks pre-plastic surgery and she would've been 18 in 1999. I am wondering if the pic of her in the files is her as a college student? Still creepy but at least not a child.

The face is redacted in the justice.gov files. How many are Ivanka??

I think just the one on Pg. 3 that someone matched to a pic of Ivanka.

That’s still sooo creepy…