The Trump Women and their Fashion Mishaps - Part Three

[Anonymous]

This thread is such a sad, weak shadow of Part One and Two.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This thread is such a sad, weak shadow of Part One and Two.

All of these threads are such a sad, weak reflection of how mean women are to one another.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The lip injection bruises on Karoline, woof. Her injector hates her.

I'm surprised they could find a lip to inject

She looks like a cute, normal girl in this picture.

People used to look like this, and have idiosyncrasies like smallish lips, and we could still call them attractive because they looked like regular humans.

Hot take I think she is still attractive.

I'm a few years older than Karoline but I think a lot of these "She's 28, I'm 35 and I look better" memes underestimate how unflattering that close-up-under-harsh-lights was. The lip injections were gross but other than that I see some visible pores (normal), some textured patches (normal), and a couple undereye lines (normal for late 20s/early 30s, especially fair skinned women like us). It didn't help that she had heavy makeup on, which you would too if you thought you were getting photographed for a national magazine at normal range.

I'm 32. I go to one of the better dermatologists in DC, and I go quarterly. I have been using Vitamin C and tretinoin daily since my mid-20s. My new coworker just told me she thought I was 28. I think my skin looks good. I still think I would fare poorly under the conditions Karoline was photographed under.

Btw, the feminist in me is pissed off that she's the ONLY one whose appearance we are talking about. Not that of JD Vance, who looks 50 when he's 41. Not that of Stephen Miller who looks like the swamp creature he is. We are literally only talking about the young woman.

The hate in use for this administration overpower our feminism ideas. I am torn.

You could exclusively hate them for their ideas, support and defense of crappy policies, and their horrible actions.

You spend so much energy tearing apart their looks because that is what you feel is the most important aspect of a woman.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The lip injection bruises on Karoline, woof. Her injector hates her.

I'm surprised they could find a lip to inject

She looks like a cute, normal girl in this picture.

People used to look like this, and have idiosyncrasies like smallish lips, and we could still call them attractive because they looked like regular humans.

Hot take I think she is still attractive.

I'm a few years older than Karoline but I think a lot of these "She's 28, I'm 35 and I look better" memes underestimate how unflattering that close-up-under-harsh-lights was. The lip injections were gross but other than that I see some visible pores (normal), some textured patches (normal), and a couple undereye lines (normal for late 20s/early 30s, especially fair skinned women like us). It didn't help that she had heavy makeup on, which you would too if you thought you were getting photographed for a national magazine at normal range.

I'm 32. I go to one of the better dermatologists in DC, and I go quarterly. I have been using Vitamin C and tretinoin daily since my mid-20s. My new coworker just told me she thought I was 28. I think my skin looks good. I still think I would fare poorly under the conditions Karoline was photographed under.

Btw, the feminist in me is pissed off that she's the ONLY one whose appearance we are talking about. Not that of JD Vance, who looks 50 when he's 41. Not that of Stephen Miller who looks like the swamp creature he is. We are literally only talking about the young woman.

The hate in use for this administration overpower our feminism ideas. I am torn.

You could exclusively hate them for their ideas, support and defense of crappy policies, and their horrible actions.

You spend so much energy tearing apart their looks because that is what you feel is the most important aspect of a woman.

I’m a feminist and spend lots of energy criticizing their policies but still can comment here. I don’t think looks are the most omportant part of a woman. But here’s why I think this thread has legs:

1) these women seem to care a lot about how they present. And the choices they make say a lot about their own views of women and gender. So it’s interesting to unpack that. That’s why talking about say Liz cheneys fashion is not interesting. Because she doesn’t have a look that is screaming at people to value her for her looks.

2) we don’t have kings and queens in this country so the fashion choices of top politicians and their spouses fills something of the same need. First admin Melania often did a really good job at this. A lot of the discussion of this thread has actually been positive of many fashion choices made by Melania and sometimes some others, and there’s also sometimes interesting discussion on why some things look good and others miss the mark.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This thread is such a sad, weak shadow of Part One and Two.

All of these threads are such a sad, weak reflection of how mean women are to one another.

😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This thread is such a sad, weak shadow of Part One and Two.

All of these threads are such a sad, weak reflection of how mean women are to one another.

I don't think it's mean to discuss the fashion.

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

She looks beautiful and this is a great dress but I would wear this somewhere where my husband was wearing a tux, not a suit.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

She looks beautiful and this is a great dress but I would wear this somewhere where my husband was wearing a tux, not a suit.

Imo it's not formal enough for a black tie event. Better for a dressy/festive cocktail event.

I think we should let her have this one. She so rarely gets anything right that I'll take it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

She looks beautiful and this is a great dress but I would wear this somewhere where my husband was wearing a tux, not a suit.

Imo it's not formal enough for a black tie event. Better for a dressy/festive cocktail event.

I think we should let her have this one. She so rarely gets anything right that I'll take it.

I'd lose the bow. Some detail to define the boundary between bodice and skirt, but more understated .

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This thread is such a sad, weak shadow of Part One and Two.

All of these threads are such a sad, weak reflection of how mean women are to one another.

I don't think it's mean to discuss the fashion.

Stop being deliberately obtuse.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Gorgeous dress! She looks beautiful.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Just because the twitter person annoys me so much I hunted for an alternate photo. She really gets no attention for her style, though, I think that's why so few photos of her at events.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

She looks beautiful and this is a great dress but I would wear this somewhere where my husband was wearing a tux, not a suit.

Vance would look frumpy even in a tux. He has zero elegance, which is why the trashy Erica suits him better.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The lip injection bruises on Karoline, woof. Her injector hates her.

I'm surprised they could find a lip to inject

She looks like a cute, normal girl in this picture.

People used to look like this, and have idiosyncrasies like smallish lips, and we could still call them attractive because they looked like regular humans.

Hot take I think she is still attractive.

I'm a few years older than Karoline but I think a lot of these "She's 28, I'm 35 and I look better" memes underestimate how unflattering that close-up-under-harsh-lights was. The lip injections were gross but other than that I see some visible pores (normal), some textured patches (normal), and a couple undereye lines (normal for late 20s/early 30s, especially fair skinned women like us). It didn't help that she had heavy makeup on, which you would too if you thought you were getting photographed for a national magazine at normal range.

I'm 32. I go to one of the better dermatologists in DC, and I go quarterly. I have been using Vitamin C and tretinoin daily since my mid-20s. My new coworker just told me she thought I was 28. I think my skin looks good. I still think I would fare poorly under the conditions Karoline was photographed under.

Btw, the feminist in me is pissed off that she's the ONLY one whose appearance we are talking about. Not that of JD Vance, who looks 50 when he's 41. Not that of Stephen Miller who looks like the swamp creature he is. We are literally only talking about the young woman.

You genuinely think this is the normal amount of wrinkles for under 35? I am 45 and would love this kind of photo taken of my skin to see what I might be missing, just wouldn't want it published