|
Okay, so you've made some important points: (1) six people were actually charged as criminal defendants, (2) they were not charged with insurrection, and (3) they were given full due process of law. |
Trump hasn't even been CHARGED with insurrection. Neither has even ONE person on J6 been charged with insurrection. You keep on keeping on. It'll get easier and easier to ignore you. |
Where does it say CHARGED in the 14th amendment? |
No, it says that in the sixth amendment, idiot. It's called due process. |
Your argument is so dumb it’s not even one of the dumb arguments that Trump is making. Here’s the petition for cert: https://thehill.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2024/01/trump-14th-amendment-cert-petition.pdf |
Blah blah blah. |
Did "Colorado Due Process" poster finally get the mic dropped on them? They went silent fast. So if SCOTUS inevitably finds away to get Trump back on the ballot but doesn't cite due process, is that a win or loss for this particular poster? |
How exactly do we determine if one commits a crime (insurrection), unless one is charged and convicted of the crime? An accusation is not proof. |
How can we know anything? |
It’s not just an accusation. There was an entire five-day bench trial where evidence was presented from both sides and a determination was made by a judge that survived two appeals. You can find the docket here: https://www.courts.state.co.us/Courts/County/Case_Details.cfm?Case_ID=5240 |
MAGA not going to read. You'd need to convert that into a 280-character tweet that gaslights, lies, and/or insults. |
[twitter]
You better reach to Trumps crack legal team to let them know about your insightful argument because they forgot to include it in their appeal. |
This is not the same as a charge, a trial and a conviction in a court of law. He was deprived of due process as outlined in the Bill of Rights. Due process, as defined in the Bill of Rights in the 5th amendment, contends that no individual may be deprived of life, liberty, or property without proper legal proceedings - a trial, the burden of proof required to convict someone, and limitations for carrying out such a process. Colorado did not hold a jury trial to determine if Trump was an insurrectionist, nor did they provide the evidence to be used against him. Colorado did not adhere to stringent rules of evidence or procedures. They included hearsay in their evidence. And the burden of proof used against Trump was not beyond a reasonable doubt. Rules matter. Due process matters. |
SCOTUS wil handle it. |