Rape of 17 year old girl - < 18 months sentence

Anonymous
How is it possible Montgomery County Maryland lets a school employee meticulously plan and rape a 17 year old girl and they want to give the guy <18 months in jail.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/education/maryland-school-security-chief-was-warned-about-inappropriate-conduct-but-kept-in-post/2017/09/24/e794343c-9e2c-11e7-9083-fbfddf6804c2_story.html?utm_term=.d8d12bbde677

What is wrong with John McCarthy and the Judge that let him out on bond to rape her again?
Anonymous
I agree. Montgomery Co. has some serious issues.
Anonymous
Anthony Weiner got 21 months for sexting. Rape gets less??
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Anthony Weiner got 21 months for sexting. Rape gets less??


Me again. I should have read the article first. It's statutory rape. So I'll change it to "Statutory rape gets less??"
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:I agree. Montgomery Co. has some serious issues.


+1

MCPS has had issues with student safety for the past several years. The superintendent and the BOE definitely do not prioritize student safety.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I agree. Montgomery Co. has some serious issues.


+1

MCPS has had issues with student safety for the past several years. The superintendent and the BOE definitely do not prioritize student safety.


Well, unless the "student" is an illegal alien. Then they roll out the welcome mat for them.
Anonymous
It's statutory rape. Not violent rape.

It's "rape" because a legislative body at some point wrote a law declaring it rape, regardless of the situation.

Had the 17 year old "girl" been a few months older, they could've gotten married in the very same courthouse. But even a day before her 18th birthday, and it's a sex crime.

Ridiculous. Things like this are why many people are branded sex offenders.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I agree. Montgomery Co. has some serious issues.


+1

MCPS has had issues with student safety for the past several years. The superintendent and the BOE definitely do not prioritize student safety.


Montgomery County has issues with misogyny in all its courts, including family. This is the tip of the iceberg
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:It's statutory rape. Not violent rape.

It's "rape" because a legislative body at some point wrote a law declaring it rape, regardless of the situation.

Had the 17 year old "girl" been a few months older, they could've gotten married in the very same courthouse. But even a day before her 18th birthday, and it's a sex crime.

Ridiculous. Things like this are why many people are branded sex offenders.


Annnnnnnnnnd the rapist speaks.

There's a reason for age of consent laws, creep.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:It's statutory rape. Not violent rape.

It's "rape" because a legislative body at some point wrote a law declaring it rape, regardless of the situation.

Had the 17 year old "girl" been a few months older, they could've gotten married in the very same courthouse. But even a day before her 18th birthday, and it's a sex crime.

Ridiculous. Things like this are why many people are branded sex offenders.


Annnnnnnnnnd the rapist speaks.

There's a reason for age of consent laws, creep.


You sound insane, just thought you should know.


People (reasonable, logical people - not you) understand that "rape" is a violent sex/dominance crime that occurs when one person forces sexual contact with another person, either through physical means, coercion, incapacity/unconsciousness, or on a child (an actual child, not a 17 year old) or other person incapable of thinking for themselves.

A seventeen year old girl, in a relationship, and a willing participant, is not being raped, in the way that reasonable, logical people (but not you) define "rape". Because they understand there's a difference. Because they're reasonable and logical.


Question for you, just to plumb the depths of your insanity: what do you think is occurring in other countries like, say, Mexico, where the age of consent or even marriage is lower? Are those young women not being raped simply by virtue of the fact that the law says that arbitrary age in which they are "adults" is lower? Because if you suggest that they aren't being raped just because the law says they are old enough, but they are yet younger than what constitutes rape here, then how does that fly? It sort of puts you in a box, doesn't it? Then again, maybe you channel someone crazy like Andrea Dworkin, and believe all sex between men and women is rape?


Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:It's statutory rape. Not violent rape.

It's "rape" because a legislative body at some point wrote a law declaring it rape, regardless of the situation.

Had the 17 year old "girl" been a few months older, they could've gotten married in the very same courthouse. But even a day before her 18th birthday, and it's a sex crime.

Ridiculous. Things like this are why many people are branded sex offenders.


Annnnnnnnnnd the rapist speaks.

There's a reason for age of consent laws, creep.


You sound insane, just thought you should know.


People (reasonable, logical people - not you) understand that "rape" is a violent sex/dominance crime that occurs when one person forces sexual contact with another person, either through physical means, coercion, incapacity/unconsciousness, or on a child (an actual child, not a 17 year old) or other person incapable of thinking for themselves.

A seventeen year old girl, in a relationship, and a willing participant, is not being raped, in the way that reasonable, logical people (but not you) define "rape". Because they understand there's a difference. Because they're reasonable and logical.


Question for you, just to plumb the depths of your insanity: what do you think is occurring in other countries like, say, Mexico, where the age of consent or even marriage is lower? Are those young women not being raped simply by virtue of the fact that the law says that arbitrary age in which they are "adults" is lower? Because if you suggest that they aren't being raped just because the law says they are old enough, but they are yet younger than what constitutes rape here, then how does that fly? It sort of puts you in a box, doesn't it? Then again, maybe you channel someone crazy like Andrea Dworkin, and believe all sex between men and women is rape?


+1,000,000
Bravo. Thank you for saying what needs to be said.
Anonymous
The age of consent is Maryland is 16 if the person is more than 4 years older than her. So it's not rape. The sexual child abuse charge comes into play because it was a relationship developed at a school, where the man had inappropriate power over her. He was responsible for her welfare and he violated it.

My guess, and it's only a guess, is that the sentence is 18 months or less in an effort to keep in here in the Montgomery County Jail, where he will get much better therapy and rehabilitation than he would at a state prison. This would increase the chances that he won't re-offend when he gets out.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
My guess, and it's only a guess, is that the sentence is 18 months or less in an effort to keep in here in the Montgomery County Jail, where he will get much better therapy and rehabilitation than he would at a state prison. This would increase the chances that he won't re-offend when he gets out.


The guy is a retired cop. MD DA's and judges bow down before law enforcement.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Anthony Weiner got 21 months for sexting. Rape gets less??


Me again. I should have read the article first. It's statutory rape. So I'll change it to "Statutory rape gets less??"


It's not "statutory pate" it's child abuse.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:It's statutory rape. Not violent rape.

It's "rape" because a legislative body at some point wrote a law declaring it rape, regardless of the situation.

Had the 17 year old "girl" been a few months older, they could've gotten married in the very same courthouse. But even a day before her 18th birthday, and it's a sex crime.

Ridiculous. Things like this are why many people are branded sex offenders.


It is not statutory rape.

It is child abuse.
post reply Forum Index » Metropolitan DC Local Politics
Message Quick Reply
Go to: