Rape of 17 year old girl - < 18 months sentence

[Anonymous]

Is this the daca

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's statutory rape. Not violent rape.

It's "rape" because a legislative body at some point wrote a law declaring it rape, regardless of the situation.

Had the 17 year old "girl" been a few months older, they could've gotten married in the very same courthouse. But even a day before her 18th birthday, and it's a sex crime.

Ridiculous. Things like this are why many people are branded sex offenders.

Annnnnnnnnnd the rapist speaks.

There's a reason for age of consent laws, creep.

+1

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I agree. Montgomery Co. has some serious issues.

Disgusting!!! The guy can't even stop bothering the girl or his own family.

So, now he'll be out in a few months ready to prowl underage girls and harass his family again.

Montgomery County is so very messed up!!!!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's statutory rape. Not violent rape.

It's "rape" because a legislative body at some point wrote a law declaring it rape, regardless of the situation.

Had the 17 year old "girl" been a few months older, they could've gotten married in the very same courthouse. But even a day before her 18th birthday, and it's a sex crime.

Ridiculous. Things like this are why many people are branded sex offenders.

Annnnnnnnnnd the rapist speaks.

There's a reason for age of consent laws, creep.

You sound insane, just thought you should know.


People (reasonable, logical people - not you) understand that "rape" is a violent sex/dominance crime that occurs when one person forces sexual contact with another person, either through physical means, coercion, incapacity/unconsciousness, or on a child (an actual child, not a 17 year old) or other person incapable of thinking for themselves.

A seventeen year old girl, in a relationship, and a willing participant, is not being raped, in the way that reasonable, logical people (but not you) define "rape". Because they understand there's a difference. Because they're reasonable and logical.


Question for you, just to plumb the depths of your insanity: what do you think is occurring in other countries like, say, Mexico, where the age of consent or even marriage is lower? Are those young women not being raped simply by virtue of the fact that the law says that arbitrary age in which they are "adults" is lower? Because if you suggest that they aren't being raped just because the law says they are old enough, but they are yet younger than what constitutes rape here, then how does that fly? It sort of puts you in a box, doesn't it? Then again, maybe you channel someone crazy like Andrea Dworkin, and believe all sex between men and women is rape?

No one is insane or 'in a box' but you. You're a manipulative bastard and please - we don't need to know what disgusting things you are doing and then justifying.

He was charged with protecting her and the other students at a high school and he was buying her pricey gifts - it's called 'grooming' her for sexual abuse, it's not love or consensual. That man has a wife and teen girls that he mistreats at home - it's a shame that he'll be walking the streets again soon and people should worry about what he's going to do next.

Montgomery County is way screwed up!!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The age of consent is Maryland is 16 if the person is more than 4 years older than her. So it's not rape. The sexual child abuse charge comes into play because it was a relationship developed at a school, where the man had inappropriate power over her. He was responsible for her welfare and he violated it.

My guess, and it's only a guess, is that the sentence is 18 months or less in an effort to keep in here in the Montgomery County Jail, where he will get much better therapy and rehabilitation than he would at a state prison. This would increase the chances that he won't re-offend when he gets out.

Won't reoffend? Right. This is not his first offense. But by all means have him serve in some posh place where the taxpayers fund therapy every day. That way when he gets out and reoffends we can all feel good about the $400,000 POS has cost the taxpayers. Oh wait...

Hey - maybe they can hire him to work as a girls soccer coach next, maybe another school job , or a day care? Or he could run for county council - the possibilities are endless.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The age of consent is Maryland is 16 if the person is more than 4 years older than her. So it's not rape. The sexual child abuse charge comes into play because it was a relationship developed at a school, where the man had inappropriate power over her. He was responsible for her welfare and he violated it.

My guess, and it's only a guess, is that the sentence is 18 months or less in an effort to keep in here in the Montgomery County Jail, where he will get much better therapy and rehabilitation than he would at a state prison. This would increase the chances that he won't re-offend when he gets out.

Won't reoffend? Right. This is not his first offense. But by all means have him serve in some posh place where the taxpayers fund therapy every day. That way when he gets out and reoffends we can all feel good about the $400,000 POS has cost the taxpayers. Oh wait...

Hey - maybe they can hire him to work as a girls soccer coach next, maybe another school job , or a day care? Or he could run for county council - the possibilities are endless.

I didn't say he wouldn't reoffend. I said better therapy would help reduce the chances. The state does nothing.

He's now a registered sex offender. He won't get hired near kids.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:How is it possible Montgomery County Maryland lets a school employee meticulously plan and rape a 17 year old girl and they want to give the guy <18 months in jail.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/education/maryland-school-security-chief-was-warned-about-inappropriate-conduct-but-kept-in-post/2017/09/24/e794343c-9e2c-11e7-9083-fbfddf6804c2_story.html?utm_term=.d8d12bbde677

What is wrong with John McCarthy and the Judge that let him out on bond to rape her again?

This is horrific.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The age of consent is Maryland is 16 if the person is more than 4 years older than her. So it's not rape. The sexual child abuse charge comes into play because it was a relationship developed at a school, where the man had inappropriate power over her. He was responsible for her welfare and he violated it.

My guess, and it's only a guess, is that the sentence is 18 months or less in an effort to keep in here in the Montgomery County Jail, where he will get much better therapy and rehabilitation than he would at a state prison. This would increase the chances that he won't re-offend when he gets out.

Won't reoffend? Right. This is not his first offense. But by all means have him serve in some posh place where the taxpayers fund therapy every day. That way when he gets out and reoffends we can all feel good about the $400,000 POS has cost the taxpayers. Oh wait...

Hey - maybe they can hire him to work as a girls soccer coach next, maybe another school job , or a day care? Or he could run for county council - the possibilities are endless.

You never know!