EVERY Six Months Jolie reiterates accusations against Pitt

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I think she will forever be angry at him for leaving her w/six kids after she invested so much in him.

She is still attractive yet nowhere near the beauty she once was when they met over 20+ yrs ago.
Now she has six children she is responsible for and I assume it cannot be very easy finding a good man now.

So she resents Brad.
He still looks great, sexy still & has moved on w/a younger, prettier woman.
His career is doing well and he seems to have fully moved on from Angie.

Angie, meanwhile is now a bitter, divorced single aging movie star.
So she wants to sabotage Brad’s career/life any way she sees fit.

I personally think karma is at play.
Angie knew she was younger and more beautiful than his wife at the time, Jennifer Aniston and that she could get Brad to leave her which he did.
She stuck her claws into him and disregarded that Brad was already spoken for.

A perfect illustration of how karma operates…

Well I wouldn’t act like she is bogged down with the six kids. Three of the kids are no longer minors and a couple aren’t even living in this country. The youngest are 15? She could clearly date and move on if she wanted to, she just doesn’t want to.

Maybe in her mind this is happening, but it’s not reality. She’s still very attractive. She’s still has a lot of money and she could be happy if she wanted to. I do feel like she’s trying to punish him for something. But the perception that she is a struggling single mom with cheerios in her hair while the ex runs off with a younger woman is not exactly accurate.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Or.... she is worried that he might hit their kids... again, that is a drunk and a pothead, and even if he claims he is clean, he might not be.
What would a regular, non-full mom do? Would you try to stop your violent druggie ex from abusing the kids?
The level of women's hate here is applying. You all must love narc Johnny.

it’s possible both can be true. Crazy attracts crazy and they are both clearly crazy. No one came out a winner here unless we are counting Jen A. who so dodged a bullet not procreating with this man.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It's called procedural unconscionability. It includes the NDA's writing and the bargain processing. The dispute happened in the first because of the abuse and custody issues. That will all be taken into consideration. You have to be careful when negotiating. Admiting that he was angry based on the custody was wrong move.

Are you trying to say that Jolie was a party with a disadvantage during negotiations? When there was someone on this thread saying that she is playing chess while he is playing checkers? That's an overstatement of their individual level of sophistication but it's closer to accurate than saying that she was at any sort of disadvantage.

[Anonymous]

So much internalized misogyny in this thread. I wish posts weren’t anonymous so we could see how many of the hateful posts here are being made by women who whinge about their own deadbeat husbands in other threads expecting sympathy.

Maybe we women deserve to be exploited and abused by men, most of us certainly don’t lift a finger to support or encourage our peers when they find themselves victims of the worst forms of misogyny. But I guess all most women know best is how to excuse men and fawn over them.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:So much internalized misogyny in this thread. I wish posts weren’t anonymous so we could see how many of the hateful posts here are being made by women who whinge about their own deadbeat husbands in other threads expecting sympathy.

Maybe we women deserve to be exploited and abused by men, most of us certainly don’t lift a finger to support or encourage our peers when they find themselves victims of the worst forms of misogyny. But I guess all most women know best is how to excuse men and fawn over them.

This whole board is a bunch of pick-mes these days, but they'll cry if you point that out.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's called procedural unconscionability. It includes the NDA's writing and the bargain processing. The dispute happened in the first because of the abuse and custody issues. That will all be taken into consideration. You have to be careful when negotiating. Admiting that he was angry based on the custody was wrong move.

Are you trying to say that Jolie was a party with a disadvantage during negotiations? When there was someone on this thread saying that she is playing chess while he is playing checkers? That's an overstatement of their individual level of sophistication but it's closer to accurate than saying that she was at any sort of disadvantage.

There's always going to be a party slightly at a disadvantage. Admiting that he was angry at the allegations then subsequently negotiating based on that emotion tilts a scale that should have never be titled. Her lawyer saying the door is now open for a discovery about the abuse was more of a targeted message to him in my opinion. The door was always open because that's the reasoning why he wanted it changed, but now they're going to pursue it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think she will forever be angry at him for leaving her w/six kids after she invested so much in him.

She is still attractive yet nowhere near the beauty she once was when they met over 20+ yrs ago.
Now she has six children she is responsible for and I assume it cannot be very easy finding a good man now.

So she resents Brad.
He still looks great, sexy still & has moved on w/a younger, prettier woman.
His career is doing well and he seems to have fully moved on from Angie.

Angie, meanwhile is now a bitter, divorced single aging movie star.
So she wants to sabotage Brad’s career/life any way she sees fit.

I personally think karma is at play.
Angie knew she was younger and more beautiful than his wife at the time, Jennifer Aniston and that she could get Brad to leave her which he did.
She stuck her claws into him and disregarded that Brad was already spoken for.

A perfect illustration of how karma operates…

Well I wouldn’t act like she is bogged down with the six kids. Three of the kids are no longer minors and a couple aren’t even living in this country. The youngest are 15? She could clearly date and move on if she wanted to, she just doesn’t want to.

Maybe in her mind this is happening, but it’s not reality. She’s still very attractive. She’s still has a lot of money and she could be happy if she wanted to. I do feel like she’s trying to punish him for something. But the perception that she is a struggling single mom with cheerios in her hair while the ex runs off with a younger woman is not exactly accurate.

Rumor is she dating someone involved with her Broadway show. Not sure how you can make the Outsiders a musical.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's called procedural unconscionability. It includes the NDA's writing and the bargain processing. The dispute happened in the first because of the abuse and custody issues. That will all be taken into consideration. You have to be careful when negotiating. Admiting that he was angry based on the custody was wrong move.

Are you trying to say that Jolie was a party with a disadvantage during negotiations? When there was someone on this thread saying that she is playing chess while he is playing checkers? That's an overstatement of their individual level of sophistication but it's closer to accurate than saying that she was at any sort of disadvantage.

There's always going to be a party slightly at a disadvantage. Admiting that he was angry at the allegations then subsequently negotiating based on that emotion tilts a scale that should have never be titled. Her lawyer saying the door is now open for a discovery about the abuse was more of a targeted message to him in my opinion. The door was always open because that's the reasoning why he wanted it changed, but now they're going to pursue it.

As they kids say: Nuh-uh. Sometimes there is a party at a disadvantage but many negotiations have parties at a reasonably equal standing, including here.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So much internalized misogyny in this thread. I wish posts weren’t anonymous so we could see how many of the hateful posts here are being made by women who whinge about their own deadbeat husbands in other threads expecting sympathy.

Maybe we women deserve to be exploited and abused by men, most of us certainly don’t lift a finger to support or encourage our peers when they find themselves victims of the worst forms of misogyny. But I guess all most women know best is how to excuse men and fawn over them.

This whole board is a bunch of pick-mes these days, but they'll cry if you point that out.

Speak for yourself.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's called procedural unconscionability. It includes the NDA's writing and the bargain processing. The dispute happened in the first because of the abuse and custody issues. That will all be taken into consideration. You have to be careful when negotiating. Admiting that he was angry based on the custody was wrong move.

Are you trying to say that Jolie was a party with a disadvantage during negotiations? When there was someone on this thread saying that she is playing chess while he is playing checkers? That's an overstatement of their individual level of sophistication but it's closer to accurate than saying that she was at any sort of disadvantage.

There's always going to be a party slightly at a disadvantage. Admiting that he was angry at the allegations then subsequently negotiating based on that emotion tilts a scale that should have never be titled. Her lawyer saying the door is now open for a discovery about the abuse was more of a targeted message to him in my opinion. The door was always open because that's the reasoning why he wanted it changed, but now they're going to pursue it.

As they kids say: Nuh-uh. Sometimes there is a party at a disadvantage but many negotiations have parties at a reasonably equal standing, including here.

That's naive of you to think then.

[Anonymous]

Three of the older kids are now adults and one who supposedly was abused. They can now speak up about the allegations. But they don’t. Why? Because he had no abuse towards them. I do think there was abuse Jolie to Pitt and Pitt to Jolie which is why they don’t talk.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Three of the older kids are now adults and one who supposedly was abused. They can now speak up about the allegations. But they don’t. Why? Because he had no abuse towards them. I do think there was abuse Jolie to Pitt and Pitt to Jolie which is why they don’t talk.

I am sue all these kids have phones and/or iPads and no one recorded what happened on the plane? Or took pics afterwards? I think Jolie has over stated what really happened on the plane and looking for an excuse to leave him and try to ruin his reputation. Didn’t happen. She only appears to be a spiteful person.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:So much internalized misogyny in this thread. I wish posts weren’t anonymous so we could see how many of the hateful posts here are being made by women who whinge about their own deadbeat husbands in other threads expecting sympathy.

Maybe we women deserve to be exploited and abused by men, most of us certainly don’t lift a finger to support or encourage our peers when they find themselves victims of the worst forms of misogyny. But I guess all most women know best is how to excuse men and fawn over them.

Apparently misogyny now equals posting opinions that you don’t like. We are not obligated to post glowing opinions about Angelina because she is a woman.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Three of the older kids are now adults and one who supposedly was abused. They can now speak up about the allegations. But they don’t. Why? Because he had no abuse towards them. I do think there was abuse Jolie to Pitt and Pitt to Jolie which is why they don’t talk.

Pax clearly did in his IG post. Zahara and Shiloh didnt drop his name for funsies.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Three of the older kids are now adults and one who supposedly was abused. They can now speak up about the allegations. But they don’t. Why? Because he had no abuse towards them. I do think there was abuse Jolie to Pitt and Pitt to Jolie which is why they don’t talk.

I am sue all these kids have phones and/or iPads and no one recorded what happened on the plane? Or took pics afterwards? I think Jolie has over stated what really happened on the plane and looking for an excuse to leave him and try to ruin his reputation. Didn’t happen. She only appears to be a spiteful person.

It's hard to remember but the plane incident happened 8 years ago in 2016, when the kids were younger and when kids did not all have phones and when phones on planes were stowed away.