The Tucker Carlson videos are dropping

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is what FAX thinks of Tucker's viewers.

The Fox watchers hold themselves in such high esteem and are viewed with such contempt by Fox.

By individual Fox employees. They are not all conservatives

a.) Stop calling yourselves conservatives. None of what you people do is about conservatism. It's all just kneejerk reactionary behavior spurred on by false outrage and lies peddled by snake oil salesmen like FOX News

b.) It should be a signal to you that if FOX news personnel are openly emailing each other referring to you, their audience as clueless gullible rubes and aren't being fired for it, it's not just "individual employees." It's core to their culture. They are knowingly and willfully selling you a bill of goods, and you are gullible enough to partake in it. And the same, I'm sure, goes for Newsmax, Daily Caller and other conservative outlets that do nothing but sell faux outrage.

Why are you people so focused on Fox and other conservative outlets? Certainly you don't want just one collective media voice speaking for all Americans, right?

I don't know, maybe because this whole thread is about Tucker (from Fox) trying to mislead viewers (again).

How is it misleading to add visual information that we didn't know before? I ignore Tucker's commentary and look at the data. Did you know that a police officer unlocked the senate door for Q Shaman?

+1

It’s pretty obvious the police are full of republicans and that is the problem. When will tucker release all the video?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:
How is it misleading to add visual information that we didn't know before? I ignore Tucker's commentary and look at the data. Did you know that a police officer unlocked the senate door for Q Shaman?

The police were vastly outnumbered and could only use their guns when they felt that there was a threat to lawmakers (which is why they shot Ashli Babbitt). Maybe some police were MAGA, but maybe some others just surrendered. And even if police did unlock the senate door, they most certainly did not unlock the smashed window or broken door that was the initial entry point into the building for Chansley's group.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is what FAX thinks of Tucker's viewers.

The Fox watchers hold themselves in such high esteem and are viewed with such contempt by Fox.

By individual Fox employees. They are not all conservatives

a.) Stop calling yourselves conservatives. None of what you people do is about conservatism. It's all just kneejerk reactionary behavior spurred on by false outrage and lies peddled by snake oil salesmen like FOX News

b.) It should be a signal to you that if FOX news personnel are openly emailing each other referring to you, their audience as clueless gullible rubes and aren't being fired for it, it's not just "individual employees." It's core to their culture. They are knowingly and willfully selling you a bill of goods, and you are gullible enough to partake in it. And the same, I'm sure, goes for Newsmax, Daily Caller and other conservative outlets that do nothing but sell faux outrage.

Why are you people so focused on Fox and other conservative outlets? Certainly you don't want just one collective media voice speaking for all Americans, right?

I don't know, maybe because this whole thread is about Tucker (from Fox) trying to mislead viewers (again).

How is it misleading to add visual information that we didn't know before? I ignore Tucker's commentary and look at the data. Did you know that a police officer unlocked the senate door for Q Shaman?

You have video of that?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is what FAX thinks of Tucker's viewers.

The Fox watchers hold themselves in such high esteem and are viewed with such contempt by Fox.

By individual Fox employees. They are not all conservatives

a.) Stop calling yourselves conservatives. None of what you people do is about conservatism. It's all just kneejerk reactionary behavior spurred on by false outrage and lies peddled by snake oil salesmen like FOX News

b.) It should be a signal to you that if FOX news personnel are openly emailing each other referring to you, their audience as clueless gullible rubes and aren't being fired for it, it's not just "individual employees." It's core to their culture. They are knowingly and willfully selling you a bill of goods, and you are gullible enough to partake in it. And the same, I'm sure, goes for Newsmax, Daily Caller and other conservative outlets that do nothing but sell faux outrage.

Why are you people so focused on Fox and other conservative outlets? Certainly you don't want just one collective media voice speaking for all Americans, right?

I don't know, maybe because this whole thread is about Tucker (from Fox) trying to mislead viewers (again).

How is it misleading to add visual information that we didn't know before? I ignore Tucker's commentary and look at the data. Did you know that a police officer unlocked the senate door for Q Shaman?

You have video of that?

This is a great example of how Tucker has misled you. No officer unlocked the senate door for the shaman. But in the voiceover during his segment, Tucker claimed officers had unlocked doors for him without showing any video of that. And now you’re repeating it as fact even though it never happened.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is what FAX thinks of Tucker's viewers.

The Fox watchers hold themselves in such high esteem and are viewed with such contempt by Fox.

By individual Fox employees. They are not all conservatives

Tucker Carlson's old producer isn't conservative? LOL

Just imagine the epic frenzied tizzy Republicans would be in if somebody from the Post, Times, or CNN said this. Too bad Fox's viewers will never hear of it.

Paul Ryan is on the board. Fox News has changed over the past few years.

Dude, Tucker feels the same way. Read his texts, he despises Trump!
Just admit that you have been conned.

I haven't been anythinged as I've never been much of a Fox fan or Tucker fan. I don't care who likes or who despises Trump. That's not important. What's important to me is due process for these men and women.

Fox was sycophantically lying to boost right wing narratives and falsely smear the left long before Trump decided to run for office, that part is not somehow novel or connected to Trump.
As for due process, that's what they've been given. Again, Chansley's attorneys had access to the video. There is nothing there that gets Chansley off the hook. Nor anyone else.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Chansley got a plea deal. That’s why he only got 4 years. If I were his lawyer and saw these vids prior to the plea agreement, I wouldn’t have encouraged him to go to trial. It’s easy for the lawyer to go on TV now and say whatever he wants, but going to trial when he’s on video committing felonies is risky.

Four years for wandering around the capitol building and taking selfies seems a bit much. Is there any evidence that he used force against any of the officers?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Chansley got a plea deal. That’s why he only got 4 years. If I were his lawyer and saw these vids prior to the plea agreement, I wouldn’t have encouraged him to go to trial. It’s easy for the lawyer to go on TV now and say whatever he wants, but going to trial when he’s on video committing felonies is risky.

Four years for wandering around the capitol building and taking selfies seems a bit much. Is there any evidence that he used force against any of the officers?

He didn’t plead to “wandering around.”

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is what FAX thinks of Tucker's viewers.

The Fox watchers hold themselves in such high esteem and are viewed with such contempt by Fox.

By individual Fox employees. They are not all conservatives

a.) Stop calling yourselves conservatives. None of what you people do is about conservatism. It's all just kneejerk reactionary behavior spurred on by false outrage and lies peddled by snake oil salesmen like FOX News

b.) It should be a signal to you that if FOX news personnel are openly emailing each other referring to you, their audience as clueless gullible rubes and aren't being fired for it, it's not just "individual employees." It's core to their culture. They are knowingly and willfully selling you a bill of goods, and you are gullible enough to partake in it. And the same, I'm sure, goes for Newsmax, Daily Caller and other conservative outlets that do nothing but sell faux outrage.

Why are you people so focused on Fox and other conservative outlets? Certainly you don't want just one collective media voice speaking for all Americans, right?

I don't know, maybe because this whole thread is about Tucker (from Fox) trying to mislead viewers (again).

How is it misleading to add visual information that we didn't know before? I ignore Tucker's commentary and look at the data. Did you know that a police officer unlocked the senate door for Q Shaman?

Assumed they had some inside help taking over the Capitol. It's so nice for Tucker to let us see who helped them.

So this is the new narrative? If I go to CNN, NYT, NBC is this going to be parroted on repeat?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Chansley got a plea deal. That’s why he only got 4 years. If I were his lawyer and saw these vids prior to the plea agreement, I wouldn’t have encouraged him to go to trial. It’s easy for the lawyer to go on TV now and say whatever he wants, but going to trial when he’s on video committing felonies is risky.

Four years for wandering around the capitol building and taking selfies seems a bit much. Is there any evidence that he used force against any of the officers?

The people who wandered around go much lighter sentences. Chansley used violence to enter, brought a weapon, left a threatening note for Pence, obstructed an official proceeding, among other charges. Those who were trespassing weren’t held during the pre trial phase, and didn’t get 4 year sentences.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Chansley got a plea deal. That’s why he only got 4 years. If I were his lawyer and saw these vids prior to the plea agreement, I wouldn’t have encouraged him to go to trial. It’s easy for the lawyer to go on TV now and say whatever he wants, but going to trial when he’s on video committing felonies is risky.

Four years for wandering around the capitol building and taking selfies seems a bit much. Is there any evidence that he used force against any of the officers?

The people who wandered around go much lighter sentences. Chansley used violence to enter, brought a weapon, left a threatening note for Pence, obstructed an official proceeding, among other charges. Those who were trespassing weren’t held during the pre trial phase, and didn’t get 4 year sentences.

The Republicans don’t know anything about that.

They are seriously so dumb and misguided, but worse is that they think they know more.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Chansley got a plea deal. That’s why he only got 4 years. If I were his lawyer and saw these vids prior to the plea agreement, I wouldn’t have encouraged him to go to trial. It’s easy for the lawyer to go on TV now and say whatever he wants, but going to trial when he’s on video committing felonies is risky.

Four years for wandering around the capitol building and taking selfies seems a bit much. Is there any evidence that he used force against any of the officers?

The people who wandered around go much lighter sentences. Chansley used violence to enter, brought a weapon, left a threatening note for Pence, obstructed an official proceeding, among other charges. Those who were trespassing weren’t held during the pre trial phase, and didn’t get 4 year sentences.

None of this is remotely true.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Chansley got a plea deal. That’s why he only got 4 years. If I were his lawyer and saw these vids prior to the plea agreement, I wouldn’t have encouraged him to go to trial. It’s easy for the lawyer to go on TV now and say whatever he wants, but going to trial when he’s on video committing felonies is risky.

Four years for wandering around the capitol building and taking selfies seems a bit much. Is there any evidence that he used force against any of the officers?

The people who wandered around go much lighter sentences. Chansley used violence to enter, brought a weapon, left a threatening note for Pence, obstructed an official proceeding, among other charges. Those who were trespassing weren’t held during the pre trial phase, and didn’t get 4 year sentences.

The Republicans don’t know anything about that.

They are seriously so dumb and misguided, but worse is that they think they know more.

They only hear what Tucker tells them.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Chansley got a plea deal. That’s why he only got 4 years. If I were his lawyer and saw these vids prior to the plea agreement, I wouldn’t have encouraged him to go to trial. It’s easy for the lawyer to go on TV now and say whatever he wants, but going to trial when he’s on video committing felonies is risky.

Four years for wandering around the capitol building and taking selfies seems a bit much. Is there any evidence that he used force against any of the officers?

The people who wandered around go much lighter sentences. Chansley used violence to enter, brought a weapon, left a threatening note for Pence, obstructed an official proceeding, among other charges. Those who were trespassing weren’t held during the pre trial phase, and didn’t get 4 year sentences.

None of this is remotely true.

What a comprehensive and detailed rebuttal you provided.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Chansley got a plea deal. That’s why he only got 4 years. If I were his lawyer and saw these vids prior to the plea agreement, I wouldn’t have encouraged him to go to trial. It’s easy for the lawyer to go on TV now and say whatever he wants, but going to trial when he’s on video committing felonies is risky.

Four years for wandering around the capitol building and taking selfies seems a bit much. Is there any evidence that he used force against any of the officers?

The people who wandered around go much lighter sentences. Chansley used violence to enter, brought a weapon, left a threatening note for Pence, obstructed an official proceeding, among other charges. Those who were trespassing weren’t held during the pre trial phase, and didn’t get 4 year sentences.

+1

There were upwards of 800 who illegally entered the Capitol on January 6th. Hundreds of the trespassers received no charges whatsoever.

[Anonymous]

Interesting that Tuck Tuck hasn't done another segment on this. He's got 40,000 hours of video and all he shows are a few short clips totaling maybe a couple minutes? What is Tuck Tuck hiding?