Kate's New Picture

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:From a person that runs in those circles--married to a count--(not me a family friend), Kate does have a colostomy bag and it is known that William is a wife beater/domestic violence.

Neither of these would be worth the trouble of posting false photos when her fashion and the children’s is so heavily tracked. There is no doubt she is fully aware people would know immediately those items and which stores they could be purchased from. Editing the colors was never worth the embarrassment of a public apology .

With the colostomy bag, there has never been mention of an additional surgery that she would need to have it removed, but a recovery by Easter time frame. It doesn’t line up imho unless she’s to wear it forever which would then still not make complete sense to avoid the photo with the kids for Mother’s Day. She could’ve been lying in bed with them sitting around her, sheets covering her body and waist. Or she could be seen taking a photo of them as they played in the yard with her side not shown.

The colostomy bag could be permanent. They are often not a 'temporary' thing. I know people who had colon cancer in a certain area that have colostomies that are permanent, as well as a friend with really bad Crohns/uclerative colitis. It's for life.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Wow at this Daily Mail article today about Williams bad temper. The article is mostly about Camilla telling her friends how awful William was as a teen to his dad but which teen isn’t awful at times?

Is the palace trying to tell us something? Why this article now in the Daily Mail (editor Richard Eden is friends with Kates brother by the way)?

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13163411/amp/William-heir-throne-rant-rave-author.html

Some think Camilla is behind all of the shenanigans…

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:From Twitter:

Spanish tea today says there was a compromising pic taken in a nightclub of the two which the Sun was going to publish. Instead Harry was served up and the Sun went with that instead. Today I also heard the Spanish say the separation has been well over a year.

The word was a divorce was imminent and would be announced in the new year. Bets were the Tindalls or the Wales. Rumour was she self harmed after being served at Christmas. The nightclub pictures do exist I heard about them before and suspected Rose was the woman involved. I'm starting to think that surgery didn't take place. Her medical issues are from the self harming. I'd say the original story was the correct one. Usually is.

It looked very likely they were no longer living together for a while now. The kids were with Kate too. I hope they are with their mum, all safe, away from William.

Re this and the count friend post: there have been multiple confident posts from those with inside knowledge. Many of them have been contradictory and mutually exclusive.

IOW, I don't believe any of these posts at all.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:From Twitter:

Spanish tea today says there was a compromising pic taken in a nightclub of the two which the Sun was going to publish. Instead Harry was served up and the Sun went with that instead. Today I also heard the Spanish say the separation has been well over a year.

The word was a divorce was imminent and would be announced in the new year. Bets were the Tindalls or the Wales. Rumour was she self harmed after being served at Christmas. The nightclub pictures do exist I heard about them before and suspected Rose was the woman involved. I'm starting to think that surgery didn't take place. Her medical issues are from the self harming. I'd say the original story was the correct one. Usually is.

It looked very likely they were no longer living together for a while now. The kids were with Kate too. I hope they are with their mum, all safe, away from William.

If it’s true that he physically abused her, then I hope it all comes out and leads to the end of the monarchy.

I hope she gets the kids, a nice home, and a huge payout including real estate and trusts for the kids.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Wow at this Daily Mail article today about Williams bad temper. The article is mostly about Camilla telling her friends how awful William was as a teen to his dad but which teen isn’t awful at times?

Is the palace trying to tell us something? Why this article now in the Daily Mail (editor Richard Eden is friends with Kates brother by the way)?

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13163411/amp/William-heir-throne-rant-rave-author.html

It's well known in close-in circles that he is physically abusive.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I read somewhere that there is tension between Kate and William because of her parents owing millions to their creditors. They lived well beyond their means and now they have no money to pay back their business debt. Apparently it’s not a good look for creditors to be chasing the future Queen’s parents and someone actually put up posters of them owing a lot of debt in their hometown. I never liked her mom. She seems to be such a gold digger. I wonder if she forced both her daughters to marry up and didn’t really care if they were truly happy or not.

I mean, surely William could settle their debt if that were the case. They have millions/billions. It wouldn’t matter to him.

This. When you are pretty much given 100s of millions just for the family you are born into, surely you can spare several million to shut that all down.

It would be easier and less political coming from Pippa's side.

[Anonymous]

Rumor she’s in Norfolk with kids.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:From a person that runs in those circles--married to a count--(not me a family friend), Kate does have a colostomy bag and it is known that William is a wife beater/domestic violence.

Neither of these would be worth the trouble of posting false photos when her fashion and the children’s is so heavily tracked. There is no doubt she is fully aware people would know immediately those items and which stores they could be purchased from. Editing the colors was never worth the embarrassment of a public apology .

With the colostomy bag, there has never been mention of an additional surgery that she would need to have it removed, but a recovery by Easter time frame. It doesn’t line up imho unless she’s to wear it forever which would then still not make complete sense to avoid the photo with the kids for Mother’s Day. She could’ve been lying in bed with them sitting around her, sheets covering her body and waist. Or she could be seen taking a photo of them as they played in the yard with her side not shown.

The colostomy bag could be permanent. They are often not a 'temporary' thing. I know people who had colon cancer in a certain area that have colostomies that are permanent, as well as a friend with really bad Crohns/uclerative colitis. It's for life.

Then at some point she would have to be photographed. It doesn’t add up to avoid the photo for Mother’s Day that she would have been 100% in control of what was provided to the public. Leaving the opportunity for the first photos to be done in public later takes away any control she has over what they look like.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wow at this Daily Mail article today about Williams bad temper. The article is mostly about Camilla telling her friends how awful William was as a teen to his dad but which teen isn’t awful at times?

Is the palace trying to tell us something? Why this article now in the Daily Mail (editor Richard Eden is friends with Kates brother by the way)?

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13163411/amp/William-heir-throne-rant-rave-author.html

It's well known in close-in circles that he is physically abusive.

Oh really? Unless and until Kate divorces him, then she is managing herself and her marriage just fine (which may include separate households).

[Anonymous]

‘In the years after her 2005 marriage to Prince Charles, Camilla recounted to members of her own family and close friends her surprise at discovering this unexpected side to Prince Charming – "the boy’s got a temper!"

‘Charles’s wife was horrified at the ranting and raving that William unleashed on occasion against her husband in her presence.

‘The rows were shattering, by Camilla’s account in the early days, with William doing the shouting and Charles submitting meekly on the receiving end. As she described it, William held nothing back.’

It was a wrath, suggests Lacey, commensurate with William’s sense of himself as future King.

Today, it is largely hidden, but younger brother Harry has his own views on William’s anger.

Writing in his memoir, Spare, Harry claims that in one 2019 row at Nottingham Cottage in the grounds of Kensington Palace, William had ‘grabbed me by the collar, ripping my necklace, and he knocked me to the floor.’

A dog bowl was apparently broken in the fracas. (Prince William has never given his version of events.)



The fight Harry describes sounds similar to the Tiktok conspiracy of Kingston and William hanging out that day and a fight ensuing

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wow at this Daily Mail article today about Williams bad temper. The article is mostly about Camilla telling her friends how awful William was as a teen to his dad but which teen isn’t awful at times?

Is the palace trying to tell us something? Why this article now in the Daily Mail (editor Richard Eden is friends with Kates brother by the way)?

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13163411/amp/William-heir-throne-rant-rave-author.html

It's well known in close-in circles that he is physically abusive.

Guys, I just got the scoop that he is actually Billie Eilish wearing a mask, hiding a lesbian affair. You heard it here first 🙏

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The idea that William wants to divorce Kate because he wuuuuvs Rose is ridiculous. Leaving aside whether there is an actual affair there or not, let’s say it’s true for the sake of argument. That just is not how it’s done in that circle. You stay married to your spouse and keep it discreet. Charles would have stayed married to Diana if she had been more stable and the Queen hadn’t told them to finally end it. Kate is the ultimate NOT Diana. She knows her role. William and Rose know their roles. Kate wants to be queen, and William has the perfect person there for it. If Rose was making noises about wanting to go public, William would throw her aside without thinking about it.

Kate is ill, she wasn’t in a state to put out the usual Mother’s Day picture, and the palace did stupid things.

Ummm, didn’t Charles admit to his ongoing affair with Camilla in a television interview— forcing the dissolution of Camilla’s marriage? I guess he either didn’t get the memo or didn’t think the rules applied to him. Oh, and Diana likely would have “been more stable” if Charles hadn’t been a cad — from deceiving and exploiting a vulnerable teenager to his ongoing violations of their marriage vows in ways that were decidedly not “discreet”. I agree that Kate is NOT Diana. Would you also say that William is NOT Charles?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wow at this Daily Mail article today about Williams bad temper. The article is mostly about Camilla telling her friends how awful William was as a teen to his dad but which teen isn’t awful at times?

Is the palace trying to tell us something? Why this article now in the Daily Mail (editor Richard Eden is friends with Kates brother by the way)?

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13163411/amp/William-heir-throne-rant-rave-author.html

It's well known in close-in circles that he is physically abusive.

That's not what "close-in circles" means...

[Anonymous]

How does one perpetrate DV when there are hundreds of servants around?
Kate doesn’t seem like she’d stand for that.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:‘In the years after her 2005 marriage to Prince Charles, Camilla recounted to members of her own family and close friends her surprise at discovering this unexpected side to Prince Charming – "the boy’s got a temper!"

‘Charles’s wife was horrified at the ranting and raving that William unleashed on occasion against her husband in her presence.

‘The rows were shattering, by Camilla’s account in the early days, with William doing the shouting and Charles submitting meekly on the receiving end. As she described it, William held nothing back.’

It was a wrath, suggests Lacey, commensurate with William’s sense of himself as future King.

Today, it is largely hidden, but younger brother Harry has his own views on William’s anger.

Writing in his memoir, Spare, Harry claims that in one 2019 row at Nottingham Cottage in the grounds of Kensington Palace, William had ‘grabbed me by the collar, ripping my necklace, and he knocked me to the floor.’

A dog bowl was apparently broken in the fracas. (Prince William has never given his version of events.)



The fight Harry describes sounds similar to the Tiktok conspiracy of Kingston and William hanging out that day and a fight ensuing

The other woman was surprised that the teenage son was mad at his dad? That's not shocking. What would be shocking would be if he weren't mad at his dad.