The Twitter Files

[Anonymous]

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Again, where was the external pressure to delete Trump from the platform coming from?

Ask Barri:

Award winning fact and context free journalism FTW.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:To suppress free speech is a double wrong. It violates the rights of the hearer as well as those of the speaker.

Differences of opinion were not suppressed. Disinformation, threats, bullying, hoaxes, and fraud are not protected manners of speech. Learn how to persuade someone with a fact-based argument. Of course, if you could do that you wouldn’t be conservative.

Who decides what disinformation is?

How about NOT some far right incel making conspiracy videos in his mom's basement.
How about NOT some nutjob like Bannon who wants an armed re-do of the J6 insurrection.
How about NOT some guy named Sergei in Moscow telling you Ukraine is the most evil corrupt Nazi nation in existence.
How about NOT some person who barely finished high school who insists they "did their research" on COVID and know more than the experts.
How about NOT some fossil-fuel-industry shill from Heartland who insists climate change is a hoax.

I think you should watch Bannon - that’s not what he’s dishing out

Oh?

Who is Phillip Bump?

Is your Google broken?

So we are to believe a WaPo writer is neutral?

Facts have a liberal bias.

Weird. I thought facts were apolitical. At least those that do not relate to politics.

That one went over your head. Facts have a liberal bias = generally speaking, facts turn out to be as as stated by liberal sources.

nice attempted walk back with the “generally speaking.”

[Anonymous]

Oh good lord, Bari Weiss is no authority on any of this. Sad tat anyone would post her missives.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:To suppress free speech is a double wrong. It violates the rights of the hearer as well as those of the speaker.

Differences of opinion were not suppressed. Disinformation, threats, bullying, hoaxes, and fraud are not protected manners of speech. Learn how to persuade someone with a fact-based argument. Of course, if you could do that you wouldn’t be conservative.

Who decides what disinformation is?

How about NOT some far right incel making conspiracy videos in his mom's basement.
How about NOT some nutjob like Bannon who wants an armed re-do of the J6 insurrection.
How about NOT some guy named Sergei in Moscow telling you Ukraine is the most evil corrupt Nazi nation in existence.
How about NOT some person who barely finished high school who insists they "did their research" on COVID and know more than the experts.
How about NOT some fossil-fuel-industry shill from Heartland who insists climate change is a hoax.

I think you should watch Bannon - that’s not what he’s dishing out

Oh?

Who is Phillip Bump?

Is your Google broken?

So we are to believe a WaPo writer is neutral?

Facts have a liberal bias.

No, facts are facts. It is just that in the era of Trumpism, dumbing down the public, defunding education and denyiong science, it is left to liberals to defend facts. The idea that one would suggest that facts have a liberal bias is pretty much all we need to know about you.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:To suppress free speech is a double wrong. It violates the rights of the hearer as well as those of the speaker.

Differences of opinion were not suppressed. Disinformation, threats, bullying, hoaxes, and fraud are not protected manners of speech. Learn how to persuade someone with a fact-based argument. Of course, if you could do that you wouldn’t be conservative.

Who decides what disinformation is?

How about NOT some far right incel making conspiracy videos in his mom's basement.
How about NOT some nutjob like Bannon who wants an armed re-do of the J6 insurrection.
How about NOT some guy named Sergei in Moscow telling you Ukraine is the most evil corrupt Nazi nation in existence.
How about NOT some person who barely finished high school who insists they "did their research" on COVID and know more than the experts.
How about NOT some fossil-fuel-industry shill from Heartland who insists climate change is a hoax.

I think you should watch Bannon - that’s not what he’s dishing out

Oh?

Who is Phillip Bump?

Is your Google broken?

So we are to believe a WaPo writer is neutral?

Facts have a liberal bias.

No, facts are facts. It is just that in the era of Trumpism, dumbing down the public, defunding education and denyiong science, it is left to liberals to defend facts. The idea that one would suggest that facts have a liberal bias is pretty much all we need to know about you.

Liberals are the ones left to defend facts. That's a perfect way to put it.

Republicans are actively, knowingly, intentionally peddling "alternative facts" (lies) as Kellyanne Conway put it. The Big Lie. And so many other lies - and they are doing it prolifically, aggressively and shamelessly.

[Anonymous]

Liberalism is based on facts. Conservatism is based on myths.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:To suppress free speech is a double wrong. It violates the rights of the hearer as well as those of the speaker.

Differences of opinion were not suppressed. Disinformation, threats, bullying, hoaxes, and fraud are not protected manners of speech. Learn how to persuade someone with a fact-based argument. Of course, if you could do that you wouldn’t be conservative.

Who decides what disinformation is?

How about NOT some far right incel making conspiracy videos in his mom's basement.
How about NOT some nutjob like Bannon who wants an armed re-do of the J6 insurrection.
How about NOT some guy named Sergei in Moscow telling you Ukraine is the most evil corrupt Nazi nation in existence.
How about NOT some person who barely finished high school who insists they "did their research" on COVID and know more than the experts.
How about NOT some fossil-fuel-industry shill from Heartland who insists climate change is a hoax.

I think you should watch Bannon - that’s not what he’s dishing out

Oh?

Who is Phillip Bump?

Is your Google broken?

So we are to believe a WaPo writer is neutral?

He didn’t write the linked report. He just retweeted a quote from it. The article was written by SPLC correspondents who were there and had photos and videos of all your favorite fascists saying fascist things. Then the reporters got kicked out for asking questions.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote: "I’ve seen a sworn affidavit from Yoel Roth, the former head of Twitter’s trust and safety. He was meeting every week before the election with FBI and other intelligence officials." -

Miranda Devine on @FoxNews

That IS a violation of the 1st

Because of BS like this Yoel Roth is getting death threats.

[Anonymous]

Hey what did Elon say about free speech again?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote: "I’ve seen a sworn affidavit from Yoel Roth, the former head of Twitter’s trust and safety. He was meeting every week before the election with FBI and other intelligence officials." -

Miranda Devine on @FoxNews

That IS a violation of the 1st

Because of BS like this Yoel Roth is getting death threats.

In addition to this, Musk just dissolved the Twitter trust and safety council. He’s also bringing back Q-Anon.

[Anonymous]

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Again, where was the external pressure to delete Trump from the platform coming from?

Ask Barri:

That just reiterates what I asked. Who were the external ones? I know one was Michelle Obama. Curious as to who the others are.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote: "I’ve seen a sworn affidavit from Yoel Roth, the former head of Twitter’s trust and safety. He was meeting every week before the election with FBI and other intelligence officials." -

Miranda Devine on @FoxNews

That IS a violation of the 1st

Because of BS like this Yoel Roth is getting death threats.

In addition to this, Musk just dissolved the Twitter trust and safety council. He’s also bringing back Q-Anon.

And all this is good how?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Again, where was the external pressure to delete Trump from the platform coming from?

Ask Barri:

That just reiterates what I asked. Who were the external ones? I know one was Michelle Obama. Curious as to who the others are.

Were you conscious on Jan 6, 2021? Trump used Twitter to send the mob after Pence among his other outrageous disinformation and attacks on state and local election officials, Governors, and Congress. Twitter didn’t ban Trump until after he had incited a coup attempt that got people killed. Every non-fascist in America asked Twitter WTF they still let this insane lunatic keep posting dangerously crazy shit.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Again, where was the external pressure to delete Trump from the platform coming from?

Ask Barri:

That just reiterates what I asked. Who were the external ones? I know one was Michelle Obama. Curious as to who the others are.

Were you conscious on Jan 6, 2021? Trump used Twitter to send the mob after Pence among his other outrageous disinformation and attacks on state and local election officials, Governors, and Congress. Twitter didn’t ban Trump until after he had incited a coup attempt that got people killed. Every non-fascist in America asked Twitter WTF they still let this insane lunatic keep posting dangerously crazy shit.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Again, where was the external pressure to delete Trump from the platform coming from?

Ask Barri:

That just reiterates what I asked. Who were the external ones? I know one was Michelle Obama. Curious as to who the others are.

It was a thing on the left for awhile, to try and get him deplatformed. I saw activist Greg Laden push for it at his blog.