PK3/4 Vent-who didn't get in to their IB school..

[Anonymous]

Vent..I knew this would happen but am still so bummed. Didn't get in to Brent PK3, IB family. Anyone else?

[Anonymous]

Yep us too. Didn't get in anywhere.

[Anonymous]

Sign me up for this thread! We are IB for Maury and are NUMBER 44! It is insane that there are at least 44 families who didn't get in. I am so pissed they expanded the boundaries just a few years ago. So stupid and short sighted.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Sign me up for this thread! We are IB for Maury and are NUMBER 44! It is insane that there are at least 44 families who didn't get in. I am so pissed they expanded the boundaries just a few years ago. So stupid and short sighted.

My number must have been so bad. I didn't get in to Miner, Appletree in LP or SW either.

[Anonymous]

I know someone who is IB #45 for Peabody, so it's not just a Maury problem...

[Anonymous]

yes, grumpy, but trying to be hopeful..#9 for Murch..possible, but...holy crap.

[Anonymous]

Maury and Brent seem impossible to get in for ECE without sibling preference. I don't know if other Hill schools are as bad as these 2 schools.

[Anonymous]

That Appletree by RFK often has spaces... But so sorry to hear this. This was us three years ago.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sign me up for this thread! We are IB for Maury and are NUMBER 44! It is insane that there are at least 44 families who didn't get in. I am so pissed they expanded the boundaries just a few years ago. So stupid and short sighted.

My number must have been so bad. I didn't get in to Miner, Appletree in LP or SW either.

What's your Miner #? Appletree LP is pretty selective now, things have changed a lot in the past 2 years.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sign me up for this thread! We are IB for Maury and are NUMBER 44! It is insane that there are at least 44 families who didn't get in. I am so pissed they expanded the boundaries just a few years ago. So stupid and short sighted.

My number must have been so bad. I didn't get in to Miner, Appletree in LP or SW either.

What's your Miner #? Appletree LP is pretty selective now, things have changed a lot in the past 2 years.

We are 34 for Miner, 4 for AT SW, and 120 for AT LP.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Maury and Brent seem impossible to get in for ECE without sibling preference. I don't know if other Hill schools are as bad as these 2 schools.

I think Peabody too. Probably in part because the Cluster boundary is so big. Maury's is crazy given how small the school is though!

[Anonymous]

Wow, Miner is up to 34+ folks on the WL now? That's a big change from just 2 years ago.

[Anonymous]

I seriously think we must have the last lottery #. We are in the 200s for all charters and our lowest WL is # 32 for a DCPS that would be suitable for pk3-4. Really depressed.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sign me up for this thread! We are IB for Maury and are NUMBER 44! It is insane that there are at least 44 families who didn't get in. I am so pissed they expanded the boundaries just a few years ago. So stupid and short sighted.

My number must have been so bad. I didn't get in to Miner, Appletree in LP or SW either.

What's your Miner #? Appletree LP is pretty selective now, things have changed a lot in the past 2 years.

We are 34 for Miner, 4 for AT SW, and 120 for AT LP.

You'll definitely get into AP SW and almost certainly Miner.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I seriously think we must have the last lottery #. We are in the 200s for all charters and our lowest WL is # 32 for a DCPS that would be suitable for pk3-4. Really depressed.

I have numbers in the 400s and 500s so save your whining.