Official 1st Presidential Debate Thread

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:


Undeniably, a win for Clinton.

WRONG!

I'm impressed she didn't have a coughing fit or a seizure, but he won.

+1,000,000

How many times did you respond +1,000,000 in this thread? Use your words.

Trumpkins have words?

4th grade level, PP.

I swear, I'm like, do you know more than 10 words?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:


Undeniably, a win for Clinton.

WRONG!

I'm impressed she didn't have a coughing fit or a seizure, but he won.

I am sorry you are wrong. Sniff sniff. I have worlds best stamina because I shake hands. sniff sniff. I have worlds greatest temperament. sniff sniff.

What medical ailment would make a person sniff so much? Can one be an effective president while sniveling all the time? Should we be seeing a legitimate medical report from an actual doctor? And no Donald, Dr. Oz need not apply.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This was sloughier.
He looked weak.

What is up with the sniffling from Trump? Coke?

Allergies. I'm a mess right now.

Mmmhmm. Just like people can get dehydrated in the heat?

Do you have proof of the coke? Just curious. Because it would be so unlike a liberal to lie...

And it would be so unlike a Trump supporter to float the insane Hillary health threads on here lately................

I didn't accuse Hillary of using illegal drugs. You did of Trump. I'm asking you if you have anything to support that?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Hold started out fine, then when it was clear Hillary was out of her league, decided to rescue her. That was pretty ridiculous

Didn't see that at all - she won most of the exchanges and started out the stronger of the two.

Not even close. He was killing her with facts.

Oh dear, please go to NPR's fact checking site. I think you'll eat those words with some relish on top.

NPR? AHHAHAHAHAH. How about CNN? Or perhaps Daily Kos?

Honey, they have actual citations. You know? Those things that show what the candidates actually said in the past? Numbers that can be consulted to prove statements right/wrong? I know that you R's love to claim "liberal bias" and all but facts are what they are. If Trump said something untrue -which is likely- and it shows in those facts, then putting your fingers in your ears and singing "la, la, la" isn't going to help.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The best thing?


Pundits saying Clinton won this on STAMINA.

Hahaha. Suck it, Trumpsters!

Trump was doing well in the first half but then slowly became unhinged. His sentences became disjointed and were difficult to follow.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Hillary will be a sore loser!
DId you hear the last questgion. She danced around answering if she would support/stand behind Trumpo when he wins and she could not answer yet Trump clearly said he would support her if she won.

Hillary is a sore loser!

YUCK!

lol.. Trump is the one who said the system was rigged when his poll numbers were down. He was already a sore loser even before the election.

Did you hear Holt's questions the last 1/2? Who the hell cares about whether Hillary looks presidential or about the birther issue? I want to hear about more substantiative issues.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:


Undeniably, a win for Clinton.

WRONG!

I'm impressed she didn't have a coughing fit or a seizure, but he won.

I am sorry you are wrong. Sniff sniff. I have worlds best stamina because I shake hands. sniff sniff. I have worlds greatest temperament. sniff sniff.

What medical ailment would make a person sniff so much? Can one be an effective president while sniveling all the time? Should we be seeing a legitimate medical report from an actual doctor? And no Donald, Dr. Oz need not apply.

Hmmm....let me think. Allergies, maybe?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The best thing?


Pundits saying Clinton won this on STAMINA.

Hahaha. Suck it, Trumpsters!

Trump was doing well in the first half but then slowly became unhinged. His sentences became disjointed and were difficult to follow.

+1 agreed, and I'm not a Trump supporter. But that's him. He can start out like he's sane, and then something or someone gets under his skin, and wham, he goes haywire. He really doesn't have the temperament to be POTUS.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Hold started out fine, then when it was clear Hillary was out of her league, decided to rescue her. That was pretty ridiculous

Didn't see that at all - she won most of the exchanges and started out the stronger of the two.

Not even close. He was killing her with facts.

Oh dear, please go to NPR's fact checking site. I think you'll eat those words with some relish on top.

NPR? AHHAHAHAHAH. How about CNN? Or perhaps Daily Kos?

Honey, they have actual citations. You know? Those things that show what the candidates actually said in the past? Numbers that can be consulted to prove statements right/wrong? I know that you R's love to claim "liberal bias" and all but facts are what they are. If Trump said something untrue -which is likely- and it shows in those facts, then putting your fingers in your ears and singing "la, la, la" isn't going to help.

The fact checkers always do. Like when Snopes implied the girl in Twin Falls Idaho was not assaulted, when in fact she was, then baited and switched the details. I'm used to how these 'fact checkers' work.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Hillary will be a sore loser!
DId you hear the last questgion. She danced around answering if she would support/stand behind Trumpo when he wins and she could not answer yet Trump clearly said he would support her if she won.

Hillary is a sore loser!

YUCK!

lol.. Trump is the one who said the system was rigged when his poll numbers were down. He was already a sore loser even before the election.

Did you hear Holt's questions the last 1/2? Who the hell cares about whether Hillary looks presidential or about the birther issue? I want to hear about more substantiative issues.

Are you saying the debate was unfair to Trump? He'll hire you right away.

Don't worry - there are always the next debates. Unless Trump backs out claiming the system is rigged against him.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Does it not matter to any Trump supporters that he just admitted he pays NO FEDERAL TAXES?

to his credit, he never actually said he paid no federal taxes. He said he'd be smart if he didn't. I think he paid very little in federal taxes, and that is partly why he won't release his returns. HRC nailed that one.

If you were a smart business person, you would understand that the goal is to reduce your tax load in a legal fashion as much as you possibly can.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Anyone watching that who would still vote for Trump needs to be medicated.

Those damn deplorables.

[Anonymous]

Trump just hinted he'll talk about Bill's "indiscretions" next debate.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Hold started out fine, then when it was clear Hillary was out of her league, decided to rescue her. That was pretty ridiculous

Didn't see that at all - she won most of the exchanges and started out the stronger of the two.

Not even close. He was killing her with facts.

Oh dear, please go to NPR's fact checking site. I think you'll eat those words with some relish on top.

NPR? AHHAHAHAHAH. How about CNN? Or perhaps Daily Kos?

Honey, they have actual citations. You know? Those things that show what the candidates actually said in the past? Numbers that can be consulted to prove statements right/wrong? I know that you R's love to claim "liberal bias" and all but facts are what they are. If Trump said something untrue -which is likely- and it shows in those facts, then putting your fingers in your ears and singing "la, la, la" isn't going to help.

I've asked this a few times, and no one has responded. If news sites like NPR, reuters are biased, then what news sources do Trump supporters use to check facts?

I'm actually a moderate republican, but I read NPR and reuters; I go to google news which is a compilation of news sources. So, what news sources do Trump supporters consider "unbiased"?

[Anonymous]

What a huge double standard that Trump accused Clinton of not being NICE to him. That was so bizarre, coming from Trump. This is such a strange election.