Another ICE Shooting in Minnesota

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The suspect was armed with a gun which the federal agents recovered.

Being armed is not a crime, and certainly not justification for summary execution.

Suspect also had 2 magazines for the handgun.

So what?

The ICE shooters are the suspects here, you moron/troll/bot. No self-respecting American would condone this.

[Anonymous]

[twitter]Was he just walking down the street? If he was protesting with a gun, that’s concerning[/twitter]

He was filming at a distance and stepped into the street to help a woman that was being attacked by ICE. He was NOT protesting with a gun. He looked nothing like this MAGA hero:

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When is Congress going to grow a backbone and put a STOP to the appalling abuse of power by the American Gestapo?

Trump and Noem are bringing this nation dangerously close to civil war.

Congress needs a capable man to step up and be the leader this nation needs right now.

Not a Progressive stuttering nonsensical jargon nobody takes seriously outside of echo chambers. Not a vicious ultra right nut gaslighting what is happening in Minneapolis.

We need someone like Obama to step forward and quietly take hold of the reins on this runaway horse.

We need someone who has served this nation as a veteran because he will have everyone's respect. Someone capable of leading.

The only person I can think of is Mark Kelly. We need a real leader ASAP.

The guy from CT is also good. Murphy??

I just know it’s not Schumer or Jeffries. They need to go. I also don’t think we need a showboat either (Newsom). Someone responsible and well spoken with integrity and is also able to withstand the pressure.

Agree. And it doesn’t have to be just one. They can all fulfill their oaths of office. But for sure Schumer and Jeffries are inadequate for the moment.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The suspect was armed with a gun which the federal agents recovered.

Being armed is not a crime, and certainly not justification for summary execution.

Suspect also had 2 magazines for the handgun.

So what?

The ICE shooters are the suspects here, you moron/troll/bot. No self-respecting American would condone this.

The PP was saying "so what?" to the preceding comment: "Suspect also had 2 magazines for the handgun."

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't know the Tim Pool guy but I went to his Twitter account to try to understand what he meant in his tweet.

I think I see the new talking points to defend the ICE murder of this man.

They are going to say it was a mistake but justifiable self-defense. Someone yelled "gun gun!!" and an agent thought his life was in danger and so shot the victim in self defense.

One of the agents, took the gun before the guy was beaten and shot. There i literally NO justification for what happened.

Here is a synced up, two angle video: https://bsky.app/profile/dominicervolina.com/post/3md6wetpavk2q

And yet Republican politicians continue to justify it. I've come to believe there is literally nothing that will lead them to say anything different.

But why are they compelled to do this? Is it fear? Peer pressure? Just stupidity?

Mediocre white men tend to take a position and stick with it regardless of how many facts you throw at them. Normally it’s about confidence in their own greatness, but they will also project onto a fellow mediocre white man. It’s quite something to behold.

These aren't even mediocre white men. Mediocre white men go to college.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:When is Congress going to grow a backbone and put a STOP to the appalling abuse of power by the American Gestapo?

Trump and Noem are bringing this nation dangerously close to civil war.

Congress needs a capable man to step up and be the leader this nation needs right now.

Not a Progressive stuttering nonsensical jargon nobody takes seriously outside of echo chambers. Not a vicious ultra right nut gaslighting what is happening in Minneapolis.

We need someone like Obama to step forward and quietly take hold of the reins on this runaway horse.

We need someone who has served this nation as a veteran because he will have everyone's respect. Someone capable of leading.

Walz is briefing the entire Democratic house caucus tomorrow morning

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The suspect was armed with a gun which the federal agents recovered.

Being armed is not a crime, and certainly not justification for summary execution.

Suspect also had 2 magazines for the handgun.

So what?

The ICE shooters are the suspects here, you moron/troll/bot. No self-respecting American would condone this.

The PP was saying "so what?" to the preceding comment: "Suspect also had 2 magazines for the handgun."

It's funny the people who fight to open carry AR 15s at Tavo Bell are trying to argue it's okay to murder a guy for a holstered handgun that he never touched and had been taken before the shooting.

[Anonymous]

The video on Reddit from the lady in the pink coat is horrifying. It was cold blooded murder. They all jumped him, kicked him pepper sprayed him and shot even when they already had his legal (permitted) weapon that he did not threaten anyone with .

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don’t know how we endure another 3 years of this.

We don't have to. ICE is but a few thousand thugs.

Get your guns while you still can. Train to use them if you don't already know how. Start open carrying when ICE comes to town -- in most places this is allowed with long guns, but even some states allow handguns to be openly carried.

Be prepared to use them when necessary.

This is a terrible idea.

Are you a second amendment defender/gun promoter?

Do not get a gun. Get your congress folk to defund ICE. Now. Get these thugs off the street and into jail where they belong.

They are the Gestapo.

These are descendenrs of slave patrolers. Same group, a couple of generations removed.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slave_patrol

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:the victim died trying to help people being brutalized by agents.

His response to them shoving two women was to a) help the women and b) put himself between them and the agents WITH HIS HANDS UP.

At no point does he reach for his gun.

What gun? According to people in this thread, he did not have one. Which is it?

No one's said he never had a gun. He had a gun that was bolstered that he never once touched or reached for. He was shot repeatedly in the back after the agents had taken this gun. His gun was never a threat to them.

Really? I didn’t see this on page 3?

jsteele wrote:For those asking about a gun, DHS posted a photo of a gun sitting on a car seat and saying that it belonged to the victim. The were no allegation that he had brandished the weapon or that he even had it on him for that matter. More news may come out about this, but that's what is available now,

Remember that DHS routinely lies.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:the victim died trying to help people being brutalized by agents.

His response to them shoving two women was to a) help the women and b) put himself between them and the agents WITH HIS HANDS UP.

At no point does he reach for his gun.

What gun? According to people in this thread, he did not have one. Which is it?

No one's said he never had a gun. He had a gun that was bolstered that he never once touched or reached for. He was shot repeatedly in the back after the agents had taken this gun. His gun was never a threat to them.

And he had a legal permit to carry…you know the 2nd amendment the red all love?!?!! Fkg hypocrites

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Media is saying victim was a "lawful gun owner."

He may have legally owned a gun, but lawful gun owners do not "tussle" with law enforcement.
So, he was not so "lawful."


Do most people who carry also have two magazines with them?

The man was attacked for helping a woman off the ground. He did not engage with them.

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

They will 100% murder again.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Media is saying victim was a "lawful gun owner."

He may have legally owned a gun, but lawful gun owners do not "tussle" with law enforcement.
So, he was not so "lawful."


Do most people who carry also have two magazines with them?

He didn't tussle with them. He stood there and they attacked him.

And yes, many people who carry also have extra mags with them. It's a standard setup.