RW vs LW news

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:

Now it’s the founders of Politico then Axios who sound like they want to ____ Trump.


They are stating the truth.

Biden has no energy. Trump has energy. Big difference.

Trump quit campaigning for a month while Biden was being President and notching several campaign stops. Trump who famously never did exercise and probably takes a golf cart to go to the bathroom at this point.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:

Now it’s the founders of Politico then Axios who sound like they want to ____ Trump.


They are stating the truth.

Biden has no energy. Trump has energy. Big difference.

Trump quit campaigning for a month while Biden was being President and notching several campaign stops. Trump who famously never did exercise and probably takes a golf cart to go to the bathroom at this point.


Now that's just ridiculous.

Everyone knows Trump is incontinent and goes to the bathroom straight into his adult diapers where he stands.
Anonymous
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:

The average Republicans’ ability to pretend these people are “fringe” instead of “inherent to the party” is getting more difficult.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:

Kinda sounds like it. Would explain their desperate pick me brand of “journalism” lately.
Alway's the lords name. Do better.
Anonymous
Anonymous
^^^^


This is why the whole trope about "liberal main stream media" is a crock.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:^^^^


This is why the whole trope about "liberal main stream media" is a crock.

x1000

There is no excuse to keep focusing on what is an increasingly small fringe and ignoring the real world impacts on women and the increasing majority who thinks women should be treated like people.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:^^^^


This is why the whole trope about "liberal main stream media" is a crock.

x1000

There is no excuse to keep focusing on what is an increasingly small fringe and ignoring the real world impacts on women and the increasing majority who thinks women should be treated like people.


The "increasing majority" believe there should be limits on abortion.
Not the radical Democrats, though.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:^^^^


This is why the whole trope about "liberal main stream media" is a crock.

x1000

There is no excuse to keep focusing on what is an increasingly small fringe and ignoring the real world impacts on women and the increasing majority who thinks women should be treated like people.


The "increasing majority" believe there should be limits on abortion.
Not the radical Democrats, though.



LOL, 70% of the country support Roe. Yes, Roe has limits, which is NO third term abortion unless the fetus is no longer viable or the health/life of the mother is at stake. The forced birthers basically want no abortion and even if the life of the mother is at stake, even if the mother's ability to get pregnant again is at risk, no incest exception, no rape exception.

So when you say "no limits on abortion" - what you call "radical democrats" are the mainstream of all the USA. No one carries a baby to the 6th month and says "you know what, I changed my mind" - no one.

But you do you.
Anonymous
These women are not the brightest bulbs.......

Anonymous
Anonymous
Uri Berliner, an editor at NPR, revealed the bias of the left wing media in his piece earlier this week.
https://www.thefp.com/p/npr-editor-how-npr-lost-americas-trust



WATCH: NPR's senior business editor Uri Berliner details how the newsroom was overtaken by Trump Derangement Syndrome after 2016 and how the "media" uncritically pushed Adam Schiff's garbage Russia collusion theory because they wanted to damage President Trump in an interview with Bari Weiss:

"...Trump's election, you know, I think like every newsroom, every legacy media knows when we were shocked, disturb, distraught, really troubled, we assumed Hillary Clinton was going to win. And, and she didn't, and it was a really an unsettling experience. But I also think, to me, it revealed that we didn't really understand a lot of what was going on in America, that we were out of touch. But I think also we we kind of locked down after a while, I think after a while we started covering Trump in a way that that, like a lot of legacy news organization, that we were trying to damage his presidency. Anything we could to harm him. And I think what we latched on to was Russia collusion, like a lot of news organizations, which was, as I write sort of catnip, although it was just rumors, and a lot of it based on pretty shoddy documents or evidence there was it wasn't really solid."

Berliner adds: "A lot of newspapers use documents or anonymous sources. We really latched on to Adam Schiff. He was like our muse to the Trump collusion story. We had him on constantly, a lot. I think I counted 25 times. You know, and, and in most of those conversations, he sort of alluded to evidence he may have had or sort of teased out, yeah, Russia, you know, he was colluding, or the campaign was colluding with Russia. And then the Muller report came out and no collusion. And, you know, I think we sort of let the story kind of disappear... Despite our feelings about Trump, this is a story we should have sort of treated differently."

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Uri Berliner, an editor at NPR, revealed the bias of the left wing media in his piece earlier this week.
[…]


Good old workin’ the ref.

Poor Republicans. You guys keep finding out that reality has a liberal bias and it makes you so mad.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:

New York Times exists now as a sort of mainstream Republican org that just can’t wrap its head around where the country is now and they keep both sides’ing and trying to present a pork chop and a crap sandwich like they’re the same thing, because they remember when the crap sandwich was maybe mostly lamb with a crap crust.

They keep trying to elevate the GOP’s fascism.
post reply Forum Index » Political Discussion
Message Quick Reply
Go to: