Meghan Markle and Prince Harry News and Updates

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don’t know who made the comment about Archie’s complexion, but my money is on Prince Charles or possibly Tyrion Lannister

Brilliant. King’s landing is definitely on fire after tonight.

I think it was William. Harry made clear it was in a conversation about what hypothetical children would look like. This tracks with previous reports that Harry was engaged by some conversation he had with William about reservations that William had about Meghan. And, inexplicably, Oprah mentioned William as she transitioned to asking Harry about the skin tone conversation.

In normal families, that's a normal question.

Neither Harry nor Meghan seemed willing to accept it as a normal question.

BECAUSE IT WASN’T. Jfc.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I had to roll my eyes when she said she couldn’t get herself help because the Royal Family took her keys and passport. If that’s true that is literally imprisonment. That is a big deal to casually throw out there (which of course means it’s not true.)

The same thing happens to US Presidents. Obama said on the record he lost his credit card and passport holding privileges. He can’t drive for life. They tried to take his blackberry and he fought them.

Obama has never once said he was unable to get help he needed because he didn’t have his things. It’s an extremely serious claim that she did not back up and Oprah didn’t press.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Everything they complained about and “revealed” could have a perfectly reasonable explanation. So underwhelming and melodramatic from a couple of almost 40 year olds.

Did you watch the interview?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No security and no princely title for the black baby.

Meghan and Harry made the no title decision. He would have been granted one by the Queen.

Meghan did not percieve it that way and she's clearly put out.

No, according to the letters patent, the great grandchildren of the monarch are not princes. Once Charles becomes King, Archie will be a Prince.

Archie would have had a title (Earl of Dumbarton), but not Prince until Charles ascended the throne. Then, like Eugenie and Beatice, he could be prince. Meghan is full of shit.

I thought Megan said they were going to change that letters patent, specifically so that Archie would be blocked from being a Prince when Charles became King.

No proof of that whatsoever.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Why do we suppose Harry keeps playing with and twirling his wedding ring?

Hmmm....

[Anonymous]

I think it was William but I think 70% of this is because he’s a angry, jealous fool just like his father. He couldn’t attack Meghan on beauty and smarts, she did her job too well as a royal, so he went for snide comments on race perhaps not realizing that things which would fly with his Norfolk buddies wouldn’t with his combat veteran brother. He was too proud and too Joffrey-like to apologize, so he ran his brother out of the Seven Kingdoms instead.

[Anonymous]

Wondering how dark the baby will be is an innocuous comment during casual conversation from a curious white person. Black people also speak like this and wonder or theorize on the shade or complexion of a baby. It's just not a big deal at all.

It's akin to labeling an innocent white girl who wants to touch your black hair because it's fascinating some sort of demonic racist. Fake race hustling and/or you're mentally ill.

And of course, that's assuming the comment even happened or happened precisely as s/he described, which it most certainly didn't.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don’t know who made the comment about Archie’s complexion, but my money is on Prince Charles or possibly Tyrion Lannister

Brilliant. King’s landing is definitely on fire after tonight.

I think it was William. Harry made clear it was in a conversation about what hypothetical children would look like. This tracks with previous reports that Harry was engaged by some conversation he had with William about reservations that William had about Meghan. And, inexplicably, Oprah mentioned William as she transitioned to asking Harry about the skin tone conversation.

In normal families, that's a normal question.

Neither Harry nor Meghan seemed willing to accept it as a normal question.

Think about the skin tone of any future kids you might have is not an appropriate comment.

[Anonymous]

It's kind of funny to contrast the slavering and crazed M haters here with what's on social media. Contrast could not be more stark.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Wondering how dark the baby will be is an innocuous comment during casual conversation from a curious white person. Black people also speak like this and wonder or theorize on the shade or complexion of a baby. It's just not a big deal at all.

It's akin to labeling an innocent white girl who wants to touch your black hair because it's fascinating some sort of demonic racist. Fake race hustling and/or you're mentally ill.

And of course, that's assuming the comment even happened or happened precisely as s/he described, which it most certainly didn't.

Family conversations*

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I had to roll my eyes when she said she couldn’t get herself help because the Royal Family took her keys and passport. If that’s true that is literally imprisonment. That is a big deal to casually throw out there (which of course means it’s not true.)

The same thing happens to US Presidents. Obama said on the record he lost his credit card and passport holding privileges. He can’t drive for life. They tried to take his blackberry and he fought them.

Obama has never once said he was unable to get help he needed because he didn’t have his things. It’s an extremely serious claim that she did not back up and Oprah didn’t press.

Help - what help? His personal effects were taken during his presidency and that’s a fact,

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It's kind of funny to contrast the slavering and crazed M haters here with what's on social media. Contrast could not be more stark.

How obsessed are you with this woman that you're refreshing and monitoring multiple outlets? Sounds unhealthy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I had to roll my eyes when she said she couldn’t get herself help because the Royal Family took her keys and passport. If that’s true that is literally imprisonment. That is a big deal to casually throw out there (which of course means it’s not true.)

The same thing happens to US Presidents. Obama said on the record he lost his credit card and passport holding privileges. He can’t drive for life. They tried to take his blackberry and he fought them.

Obama has never once said he was unable to get help he needed because he didn’t have his things. It’s an extremely serious claim that she did not back up and Oprah didn’t press.

Oprah never presses.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I think it was William but I think 70% of this is because he’s a angry, jealous fool just like his father. He couldn’t attack Meghan on beauty and smarts, she did her job too well as a royal, so he went for snide comments on race perhaps not realizing that things which would fly with his Norfolk buddies wouldn’t with his combat veteran brother. He was too proud and too Joffrey-like to apologize, so he ran his brother out of the Seven Kingdoms instead.

Smarts? Do you know her SAT score?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It's kind of funny to contrast the slavering and crazed M haters here with what's on social media. Contrast could not be more stark.

Pro-tip: Don't just look at the people you follow. Twitter is small, so small that you can actually look at every tweet and see everything, all sides.