Thread for Derek Chauvin trial watchers?

[Anonymous]

Will the jury get back still today with a verdict??

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Nelson is trying for a mistrial also quotes above pp congresswoman’s comments

it would take a very brave judge to give the defense a mistrial. This is setting up to be the LA riots all over again if its not a guilty verdict

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Nelson is trying for a mistrial also quotes above pp congresswoman’s comments

Dum dum Maxine. Good move. Who keeps electing her?

[Anonymous]

Judge had no business even saying that. Wow.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Judge had no business even saying that. Wow.

I agree.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Judge had no business even saying that. Wow.

Cant watch. what was said?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Coming in late: death certificate says “homocide”, wth is the debate about???

Homicide, as they said earlier in the trial, isn't a legal designation or something that results in an automatic conviction. There are only a few options; "natural", "suicide", "homicide", "other" (am I missing one?). So the ME said homicide, but the defense is arguing that that's a medical opinion.

Homicide from a medical viewpoint doesn't imply intent or malice.

I thought the defense attorney did a great job explaining that and with his closing argument. I was a full guilty and now I could not convict. I am concentrating on the entire incident, not just the 9 minutes.

Same. His earnestness is a plus.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Coming in late: death certificate says “homocide”, wth is the debate about???

Homicide, as they said earlier in the trial, isn't a legal designation or something that results in an automatic conviction. There are only a few options; "natural", "suicide", "homicide", "other" (am I missing one?). So the ME said homicide, but the defense is arguing that that's a medical opinion.

Homicide from a medical viewpoint doesn't imply intent or malice.

I was being kind of facetious because the defense attorney’s arguments are awful, but I also appreciate this reasonable explanation. Thank you.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Nelson is trying for a mistrial also quotes above pp congresswoman’s comments

it would take a very brave judge to give the defense a mistrial. This is setting up to be the LA riots all over again if its not a guilty verdict

Let's have higher expectations of people.

[Anonymous]

“I’ll give you that congresswoman waters may have given you something to appeal that may result in this whole trial being overturned”

Brutal

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Judge had no business even saying that. Wow.

Maxine Waters had no business inciting violence. She knows better.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Judge had no business even saying that. Wow.

Cant watch. what was said?

This thread has the video. Maxine Waters is disgusting.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Judge had no business even saying that. Wow.

Maxine Waters had no business inciting violence. She knows better.

Nancy Pelosi thinks she has done nothing wrong. Wonder if Nancy heard what the judge had to say.

[Anonymous]

Any guesses on how long the jury will be out? Will they try to have the verdict read in the AM vs PM?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Nelson is trying for a mistrial also quotes above pp congresswoman’s comments

it would take a very brave judge to give the defense a mistrial. This is setting up to be the LA riots all over again if its not a guilty verdict

Let's have higher expectations of people.

Justified shooting result in protests, if the murder that started this doesn’t end with guilty, I expect the la riots all over again