| Agree with PP. They only told parents because the rumors were rampant and not because they wanted to be open to parents about their plans. |
Toward the end of the MO meeting they said that the reason they didn't consult parents earlier is because they were not allowed to talk about the deal publicly. The seller of the site probably didn't want them talking about it until they notified their stakeholders. Any staff members who discussed this previously should not have done so. |
Any updates on this from people in the know? Inquiring accepted student minds want to know. |
|
Recently we heard on a tour that they do intend to go to Kingsbury in 2018. I realize it's not signed sealed and delivered. We based our own decision partly on the likelihood of this move.
As for the claim that nobody knew till opt-in, I did go to an open house before lottery results came out (I guess in February?) and was told SD was temporary, so they may not have said WHERE or exactly when, but did say it was a lease and they wanted to consolidate to one building eventually. I gather some people are very upset so we talked to some parents in person which is more useful than reading DCUM IMHO. Still good to know all the potential challenges. I felt most schools probably have these though (see angry MV threads as well) and schools on here are either on pedestals or trashed, often in the same threads. |
People hear what they want to hear. To some 'eventually' sounded like a decade or more in the future when, in fact, it may be 12-18 months in the future. |
True, I know I walked away thinking no way because I pictured Walter Reed as the destination (which it eventually is, DCI). Now we got an offer and took it anyway. Hope it's worth it
|