Little pink monster blog

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This doesn’t have anything to do with Kane show. Mod should delete all these posts about a family matter. Isn’t that the rule on this thread?

This thread isn’t about the Kane Show. This is about their family and Natasha documenting everything on social media. You’re in the wrong thread.

LOL. Also, Mod? Doesnt James or whatever do everything?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This doesn’t have anything to do with Kane show. Mod should delete all these posts about a family matter. Isn’t that the rule on this thread?

This thread isn’t about the Kane Show. This is about their family and Natasha documenting everything on social media. You’re in the wrong thread.

LOL. Also, Mod? Doesnt James or whatever do everything?

Jeff. His name is Jeff.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I don't agree with what Kane did if, in fact, he did pick up the girls on her day, BUT I still don't think she should be putting their family issues on blast. How is publicizing it going to help her situation in any way? She seems a little dense if you ask me and I get the feeling she's playing the "woe is me" role. She needs to just continue filing motions for his violations of custody in order to fight back, but she doesn't need to detail it all on social media. At least Kane is keeping quiet about it. Her kids don't need to read about their parents' issues on the internet!

Really? He is the original one who publicized their family's drama, ON THE RADIO, nationally syndicated. With no opportunity for her to give a rebuttal or contradict or share her version. Just him, dumping HER business on national radio. He did the furthest thing from "keep quiet about it". He made it so the kids will ALWAYS be able to google their parents and hear way too much, their daddy's VOICE talking for twenty minutes about their mom.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't agree with what Kane did if, in fact, he did pick up the girls on her day, BUT I still don't think she should be putting their family issues on blast. How is publicizing it going to help her situation in any way? She seems a little dense if you ask me and I get the feeling she's playing the "woe is me" role. She needs to just continue filing motions for his violations of custody in order to fight back, but she doesn't need to detail it all on social media. At least Kane is keeping quiet about it. Her kids don't need to read about their parents' issues on the internet!

Really? He is the original one who publicized their family's drama, ON THE RADIO, nationally syndicated. With no opportunity for her to give a rebuttal or contradict or share her version. Just him, dumping HER business on national radio. He did the furthest thing from "keep quiet about it". He made it so the kids will ALWAYS be able to google their parents and hear way too much, their daddy's VOICE talking for twenty minutes about their mom.

Yes, but two wrongs don't make a right. He's been quiet about it since. Not sure what N stands to gain by continually talking about it on the internet.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't agree with what Kane did if, in fact, he did pick up the girls on her day, BUT I still don't think she should be putting their family issues on blast. How is publicizing it going to help her situation in any way? She seems a little dense if you ask me and I get the feeling she's playing the "woe is me" role. She needs to just continue filing motions for his violations of custody in order to fight back, but she doesn't need to detail it all on social media. At least Kane is keeping quiet about it. Her kids don't need to read about their parents' issues on the internet!

Really? He is the original one who publicized their family's drama, ON THE RADIO, nationally syndicated. With no opportunity for her to give a rebuttal or contradict or share her version. Just him, dumping HER business on national radio. He did the furthest thing from "keep quiet about it". He made it so the kids will ALWAYS be able to google their parents and hear way too much, their daddy's VOICE talking for twenty minutes about their mom.

Yes, but two wrongs don't make a right. He's been quiet about it since. Not sure what N stands to gain by continually talking about it on the internet.

But you see, he hasn’t been quiet. Maybe on nationally syndicated radio, yes. But what N is trying to explain is that he is going beyond “trash talk” in hurting the children to hurt N. He has done numerous things (as mentioned on this thread) to use his voice/money/power to watch her stay beneath him. The only one power N had was her voice. Now she’s deciding to use it.

[Anonymous]

And he would be so wise not to bring this up on the air, because the cost of sympathy from his viewers will be the expense of some going online googling “Kane show divorce” Where they will find this website, and easily spot out the more interesting bits in the threads, as there are multiple.And what should scare him is that he doesn’t come across as a ‘great guy in real life’. So if he was smart, and wanted to keep the court of public opinion in his favor with his massive audience, he wouldn’t say a word about N. Essentially remain silent as she goes on to share her version of events.

But N has a lot to say Because she didn’t say anything for such a long time. That ended up being a total unintended power grab in this resurrection of Kane going on air for 20 minutes, talking for 20 straight minutes.

[Anonymous]

I stopped listening to the Kane show shortly after that incident and never listened again.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I don't agree with what Kane did if, in fact, he did pick up the girls on her day, BUT I still don't think she should be putting their family issues on blast. How is publicizing it going to help her situation in any way? She seems a little dense if you ask me and I get the feeling she's playing the "woe is me" role. She needs to just continue filing motions for his violations of custody in order to fight back, but she doesn't need to detail it all on social media. At least Kane is keeping quiet about it. Her kids don't need to read about their parents' issues on the internet!

But he doesn't keep quiet. He's tried to control the narrative from the beginning. I don't even know them and I know this much from following along.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't agree with what Kane did if, in fact, he did pick up the girls on her day, BUT I still don't think she should be putting their family issues on blast. How is publicizing it going to help her situation in any way? She seems a little dense if you ask me and I get the feeling she's playing the "woe is me" role. She needs to just continue filing motions for his violations of custody in order to fight back, but she doesn't need to detail it all on social media. At least Kane is keeping quiet about it. Her kids don't need to read about their parents' issues on the internet!

Really? He is the original one who publicized their family's drama, ON THE RADIO, nationally syndicated. With no opportunity for her to give a rebuttal or contradict or share her version. Just him, dumping HER business on national radio. He did the furthest thing from "keep quiet about it". He made it so the kids will ALWAYS be able to google their parents and hear way too much, their daddy's VOICE talking for twenty minutes about their mom.

Yes, but two wrongs don't make a right. He's been quiet about it since. Not sure what N stands to gain by continually talking about it on the internet.

I imagine she's tired of being shut down by his money and his public forum he can bash her on anytime he likes.

[Anonymous]

Reading on her IG that he did this makes me sick and I hope she sings the truth about him from the rooftops.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't agree with what Kane did if, in fact, he did pick up the girls on her day, BUT I still don't think she should be putting their family issues on blast. How is publicizing it going to help her situation in any way? She seems a little dense if you ask me and I get the feeling she's playing the "woe is me" role. She needs to just continue filing motions for his violations of custody in order to fight back, but she doesn't need to detail it all on social media. At least Kane is keeping quiet about it. Her kids don't need to read about their parents' issues on the internet!

Really? He is the original one who publicized their family's drama, ON THE RADIO, nationally syndicated. With no opportunity for her to give a rebuttal or contradict or share her version. Just him, dumping HER business on national radio. He did the furthest thing from "keep quiet about it". He made it so the kids will ALWAYS be able to google their parents and hear way too much, their daddy's VOICE talking for twenty minutes about their mom.

Yes, but two wrongs don't make a right. He's been quiet about it since. Not sure what N stands to gain by continually talking about it on the internet.

But you see, he hasn’t been quiet. Maybe on nationally syndicated radio, yes. But what N is trying to explain is that he is going beyond “trash talk” in hurting the children to hurt N. He has done numerous things (as mentioned on this thread) to use his voice/money/power to watch her stay beneath him. The only one power N had was her voice. Now she’s deciding to use it.

Umm but what does bashing her ex on a public forum do to help her get custody back or to get him to follow custody rules? I would think that it would hurt her since she's publicly bashing him and he can take everything she posts to the judge to show that she's violating whatever kind of agreement they have regarding confidentiality and parental alienation. She needs to be telling all this to the courts and her attorney, not the internet.

[Anonymous]

There's nothing a judge hates more than one parent disregarding the ordered custody agreement.

My ex-SIL wanted permission to move from this area to PA with my niece. My brother gave permission with the stipulation that she was responsible for transporting my niece from PA to DC each Friday evening - Sunday afternoon. The judge agreed and set the order. They moved and the arrangement lasted maybe 2 months before excuses started coming up on why my niece couldn't come that weekend. Then the holidays came where he was supposed to have my niece and his ex made plans fully knowing this and telling my niece about them (going to Disney). The ex then phrased it as "well, you have to ask Daddy if you can go to Disney with us because it is his holiday with you" and of course he said yes. So then it morphed into celebrating Christmas with her in January and getting to see her only one weekend per month.

When they went back to the court, the judge was irate that his ordered hadn't been followed. She now has a case worker of sorts that she must check in with with a valid and verifiable excuse on why my niece can't visit on a particular weekend. Any adjustments on holidays have to be made 4 weeks in advance. And if she doesn't follow the orders, the judge threatened to fine her and then possibly jail her.

[Anonymous]

Instead of whining all day - here's a thought, get a job Natasha. Because those legal bills will not be cheap.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Instead of whining all day - here's a thought, get a job Natasha. Because those legal bills will not be cheap.

Sheeeet, I make over 60K and I wouldn't be able to afford a lawyer with all the crap he's pulled.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:He claims she wasn't paying the bills and the electric bill was over $1,000. For anyone that has Dominion power or any other electric company in the DC area, they know you can't go that far in debt and still have your power on.

That's definitely not true. When I was laid off back in 2012, my Dominion bill was over $1000. Yes, it was about to be cut off and would've been had my family not helped - but it was definitely in the $1000-1100 range.