Support the Montgomery Virtual Academy (MVA) from Budget Cuts!

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Are the VAcademy students performing better than in-school students? So VAcademy students take McAP, MISA, MAP, Benchmark etc assessments?


Yes, some they can do virtually, which almost all kids do and some have to be done at their home school, most take them, not all. Only a few are graduation requirements.


This can’t be true. MVA supporters on here claim that most kids don’t take these assessments, especially the really smart/advanced kids, which is why the data regarding student achievement is so bad for the MVA as compared to in person schools.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Are the VAcademy students performing better than in-school students? So VAcademy students take McAP, MISA, MAP, Benchmark etc assessments?


Lower grades performed much worse compared to in-person:
https://ww2.montgomeryschoolsmd.org/departments/sharedaccountability/reports/2023/Virtual%20Academy%20FINAL.pdf


FARMS students in the MVA program also scored significantly worse than their in person peers on assessments.


Citation? I don't think that's in the report linked to above.
Anonymous
My son graduated MVA and he is now at UMD. He did not have any medical issues, the reason he was in MVA is because he absolutely thrived. It’s a fantastic school.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Are the VAcademy students performing better than in-school students? So VAcademy students take McAP, MISA, MAP, Benchmark etc assessments?


Lower grades performed much worse compared to in-person:
https://ww2.montgomeryschoolsmd.org/departments/sharedaccountability/reports/2023/Virtual%20Academy%20FINAL.pdf


Out of date data


Perhaps, but it's the most complete data we have.


No, there is new data being posted. Keep up.


Personal anecdotes containing excuses for why the objective data about the MVA’s poor performance in educating kids is not “new data”.


Oh I think you are confused. My push to the previous comment / the lengthy post has nothing related to new data thread. That’s why I didn’t quote it!!

It’s just a follow up when that data report is shared. You can share your report and I would reshare the comment which explain how “its analysis used inadequate data, inadequate outcomes, inadequate methods.” Let’s be fair here.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Are the VAcademy students performing better than in-school students? So VAcademy students take McAP, MISA, MAP, Benchmark etc assessments?


Lower grades performed much worse compared to in-person:
https://ww2.montgomeryschoolsmd.org/departments/sharedaccountability/reports/2023/Virtual%20Academy%20FINAL.pdf


FARMS students in the MVA program also scored significantly worse than their in person peers on assessments.


Citation? I don't think that's in the report linked to above.


See pages 27 and 29 of the report.

“Students in grades 1 through 5 attending MVA were significantly less likely than their in person peers to meet their projected growth in math in Spring 2022. Within student service groups, MVA students receiving FARMS were significantly less likely than their in person peers to meet their projected growth in math…”

The same is said about reading on Slide 29.

Unfortunately, while the MVA might work for some, it leaves behind the youngest and poorest kids.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Are the VAcademy students performing better than in-school students? So VAcademy students take McAP, MISA, MAP, Benchmark etc assessments?


Lower grades performed much worse compared to in-person:
https://ww2.montgomeryschoolsmd.org/departments/sharedaccountability/reports/2023/Virtual%20Academy%20FINAL.pdf


Out of date data


Perhaps, but it's the most complete data we have.


No, there is new data being posted. Keep up.


Personal anecdotes containing excuses for why the objective data about the MVA’s poor performance in educating kids is not “new data”.


Oh I think you are confused. My push to the previous comment / the lengthy post has nothing related to new data thread. That’s why I didn’t quote it!!

It’s just a follow up when that data report is shared. You can share your report and I would reshare the comment which explain how “its analysis used inadequate data, inadequate outcomes, inadequate methods.” Let’s be fair here.


Ok, sorry. Didn’t realize you were the arm chair data scientist who took apart the report with your cogent analysis upthread.
Anonymous

Good Afternoon! My name is Nancy Cipolla. I have been a teacher in

MCPS for 30 years and have been fortunate enough to teach at the Virtual

Academy for the past three years. I am here today to request that the

Board of Education fully fund the Virtual Academy as planned for grades

2-12 for Fiscal Year 25 and beyond.

In February, the board came to a unanimous agreement to fund the full

program at the Virtual Academy for next year. In fact, Ms. Wolf said, “You

were going to ensure that the MVA was going to stay put for Fiscal Year

2025.” There was some discussion about wanting to analyze the data at

the lower school.

As a teacher in MCPS, I believe it is crucial to base our decisions on

evidence and data that demonstrate the efficacy of programs. So let’s

discuss the data from our Lower School so you can see the value of our

program and see clearly who will be affected by the decisions you

make today.

Let’s start by taking a deep dive into our performance data. The data for

our lower school shows that we surpass the average achievement in

MCPS in both reading and math. Whereas MCPS shows 46.5% average

achievement in math and 55.3% average achievement in reading, our

average math achievement is 84% and our average reading achievement

is 77%. To break achievement down further, our end of year Dibels data

showed 73% of our first graders and 69% of our second graders reading at

or above grade level. NWEA Spring data shows 64% of our third, fourth,

and fifth graders met proficiency on MAPR . Spring Data for MAPP and

MAPM also show we are achieving better than many schools in MCPS.

72% of our first graders, 74% of our second graders, and 66% of our third

graders met proficiency. An astounding 90% of fourth graders and 89% of

fifth graders receiving virtual instruction in math met proficiency. The data

doesn’t lie, virtual instruction works for elementary students. Our students

are not only thriving but they are exceeding standards.

Voice data also shows how students are building strong relationships

with their peers and teachers and have self-confidence. This is an indicator

that we have created equitable identity-affirming classrooms where

students feel supported and comfortable asking questions . 94% of

our students feel confident that they can do well. 91% of our students said

they had friends in the Virtual Academy and that they had opportunities to

learn about people from a variety of different racial, ethnic, and cultural

backgrounds.

Now let’s look at the demographics of the Virtual Academy. Our student

population is predominantly from the Global Majority (35% Hispanic,

21.4% African American, 24.3 % Caucasian,13.8% Asian, 5.2%

Multi-racial, .2 % American Indian, and.1% Hawaiian/Pacific Islander).

Furthermore, our school has a 67% FARMS rate, yet we do not receive

any Title I funding or benefits.

The Virtual Academy also offers hybrid classes to over 200 elementary

students attending approximately 30 in-person schools. Next year,

our hybrid program was scheduled to expand to over 300 students.

Through this program, we are able to provide instruction in enriched

mathematics. Not only is this a cost savings to the county, as our four

teachers would be equivalent to approximately 20 in person teaching

positions, but let’s take a look at who is benefiting from hybrid instruction.

80% of the schools that utilize hybrid math instruction are Title 1

Schools, with student populations that represent the global majority.

These students would not be receiving enriched math instruction if not for

the Virtual Academy. As you ponder this, think about how many students

are not receiving instruction in enriched literacy (ELC) in these same

schools. Why are these students’ academic needs being ignored?

I ask the board as you deliberate on your decision today to consider your

core purpose of preparing all students to thrive in their future and

your core value of equity. Think very carefully about the students you are

doing harm to if you decide to close the Virtual Academy. Many of them

are students who are financially disadvantaged and represent the global

majority. How does this fit with your values? Each board member has an

opportunity today to show Montgomery County that you are committed to

your core purpose and values. By supporting the Virtual Academy, you

are allowing our students to continue to thrive and you are ensuring

all students have an equitable opportunity for high quality education

in Montgomery County Public Schools

We are asking you to fully fund the Virtual Academy as planned for

grades 2-12 for FY25 and beyond.

https://go.boarddocs.com/mabe/mcpsmd/Board.nsf/files/D64KJ25206F1/$file/Nancy Cipolla Testimony.pdf


Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Are the VAcademy students performing better than in-school students? So VAcademy students take McAP, MISA, MAP, Benchmark etc assessments?


Lower grades performed much worse compared to in-person:
https://ww2.montgomeryschoolsmd.org/departments/sharedaccountability/reports/2023/Virtual%20Academy%20FINAL.pdf


Out of date data


Perhaps, but it's the most complete data we have.


No, there is new data being posted. Keep up.


Personal anecdotes containing excuses for why the objective data about the MVA’s poor performance in educating kids is not “new data”.


Oh I think you are confused. My push to the previous comment / the lengthy post has nothing related to new data thread. That’s why I didn’t quote it!!

It’s just a follow up when that data report is shared. You can share your report and I would reshare the comment which explain how “its analysis used inadequate data, inadequate outcomes, inadequate methods.” Let’s be fair here.


Ok, sorry. Didn’t realize you were the arm chair data scientist who took apart the report with your cogent analysis upthread.


LOL I m not either🤣🤣🤣you really like to make assumptions.

Oh wait a minute or are you trying to imply that you are that medicore person who generated the data report and that’s why you can keep sharing? And I m not allow to?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Are the VAcademy students performing better than in-school students? So VAcademy students take McAP, MISA, MAP, Benchmark etc assessments?


Lower grades performed much worse compared to in-person:
https://ww2.montgomeryschoolsmd.org/departments/sharedaccountability/reports/2023/Virtual%20Academy%20FINAL.pdf


Out of date data


Perhaps, but it's the most complete data we have.


No, there is new data being posted. Keep up.


Personal anecdotes containing excuses for why the objective data about the MVA’s poor performance in educating kids is not “new data”.


Oh I think you are confused. My push to the previous comment / the lengthy post has nothing related to new data thread. That’s why I didn’t quote it!!

It’s just a follow up when that data report is shared. You can share your report and I would reshare the comment which explain how “its analysis used inadequate data, inadequate outcomes, inadequate methods.” Let’s be fair here.


Ok, sorry. Didn’t realize you were the arm chair data scientist who took apart the report with your cogent analysis upthread.


LOL I m not either🤣🤣🤣you really like to make assumptions.

Oh wait a minute or are you trying to imply that you are that medicore person who generated the data report and that’s why you can keep sharing? And I m not allow to?


Of course you’re allowed to post your thoughts about the report. Please continue to do so - the more you say about it the better.
Anonymous
@Nancy Cipolla - Separate from your testimony, I see you're looking for a different job. Why aren't you willing to be transferred to a school in MCPS?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:@Nancy Cipolla - Separate from your testimony, I see you're looking for a different job. Why aren't you willing to be transferred to a school in MCPS?


Won’t be able to work from home
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:@Nancy Cipolla - Separate from your testimony, I see you're looking for a different job. Why aren't you willing to be transferred to a school in MCPS?


Won’t be able to work from home


Are you Nancy?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:@Nancy Cipolla - Separate from your testimony, I see you're looking for a different job. Why aren't you willing to be transferred to a school in MCPS?


Won’t be able to work from home


Why don't you want to teach in a school?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Good Afternoon! My name is Nancy Cipolla. I have been a teacher in

MCPS for 30 years and have been fortunate enough to teach at the Virtual

Academy for the past three years. I am here today to request that the

Board of Education fully fund the Virtual Academy as planned for grades

2-12 for Fiscal Year 25 and beyond.

In February, the board came to a unanimous agreement to fund the full

program at the Virtual Academy for next year. In fact, Ms. Wolf said, “You

were going to ensure that the MVA was going to stay put for Fiscal Year

2025.” There was some discussion about wanting to analyze the data at

the lower school.

As a teacher in MCPS, I believe it is crucial to base our decisions on

evidence and data that demonstrate the efficacy of programs. So let’s

discuss the data from our Lower School so you can see the value of our

program and see clearly who will be affected by the decisions you

make today.

Let’s start by taking a deep dive into our performance data. The data for

our lower school shows that we surpass the average achievement in

MCPS in both reading and math. Whereas MCPS shows 46.5% average

achievement in math and 55.3% average achievement in reading, our

average math achievement is 84% and our average reading achievement

is 77%. To break achievement down further, our end of year Dibels data

showed 73% of our first graders and 69% of our second graders reading at

or above grade level. NWEA Spring data shows 64% of our third, fourth,

and fifth graders met proficiency on MAPR . Spring Data for MAPP and

MAPM also show we are achieving better than many schools in MCPS.

72% of our first graders, 74% of our second graders, and 66% of our third

graders met proficiency. An astounding 90% of fourth graders and 89% of

fifth graders receiving virtual instruction in math met proficiency. The data

doesn’t lie, virtual instruction works for elementary students. Our students

are not only thriving but they are exceeding standards.

Voice data also shows how students are building strong relationships

with their peers and teachers and have self-confidence. This is an indicator

that we have created equitable identity-affirming classrooms where

students feel supported and comfortable asking questions . 94% of

our students feel confident that they can do well. 91% of our students said

they had friends in the Virtual Academy and that they had opportunities to

learn about people from a variety of different racial, ethnic, and cultural

backgrounds.

Now let’s look at the demographics of the Virtual Academy. Our student

population is predominantly from the Global Majority (35% Hispanic,

21.4% African American, 24.3 % Caucasian,13.8% Asian, 5.2%

Multi-racial, .2 % American Indian, and.1% Hawaiian/Pacific Islander).

Furthermore, our school has a 67% FARMS rate, yet we do not receive

any Title I funding or benefits.

The Virtual Academy also offers hybrid classes to over 200 elementary

students attending approximately 30 in-person schools. Next year,

our hybrid program was scheduled to expand to over 300 students.

Through this program, we are able to provide instruction in enriched

mathematics. Not only is this a cost savings to the county, as our four

teachers would be equivalent to approximately 20 in person teaching

positions, but let’s take a look at who is benefiting from hybrid instruction.

80% of the schools that utilize hybrid math instruction are Title 1

Schools, with student populations that represent the global majority.

These students would not be receiving enriched math instruction if not for

the Virtual Academy. As you ponder this, think about how many students

are not receiving instruction in enriched literacy (ELC) in these same

schools. Why are these students’ academic needs being ignored?

I ask the board as you deliberate on your decision today to consider your

core purpose of preparing all students to thrive in their future and

your core value of equity. Think very carefully about the students you are

doing harm to if you decide to close the Virtual Academy. Many of them

are students who are financially disadvantaged and represent the global

majority. How does this fit with your values? Each board member has an

opportunity today to show Montgomery County that you are committed to

your core purpose and values. By supporting the Virtual Academy, you

are allowing our students to continue to thrive and you are ensuring

all students have an equitable opportunity for high quality education

in Montgomery County Public Schools

We are asking you to fully fund the Virtual Academy as planned for

grades 2-12 for FY25 and beyond.

https://go.boarddocs.com/mabe/mcpsmd/Board.nsf/files/D64KJ25206F1/$file/Nancy Cipolla Testimony.pdf




The Board of Education refused to let this teacher speak at the Board meeting today. Win win for them.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Good Afternoon! My name is Nancy Cipolla. I have been a teacher in

MCPS for 30 years and have been fortunate enough to teach at the Virtual

Academy for the past three years. I am here today to request that the

Board of Education fully fund the Virtual Academy as planned for grades

2-12 for Fiscal Year 25 and beyond.

In February, the board came to a unanimous agreement to fund the full

program at the Virtual Academy for next year. In fact, Ms. Wolf said, “You

were going to ensure that the MVA was going to stay put for Fiscal Year

2025.” There was some discussion about wanting to analyze the data at

the lower school.

As a teacher in MCPS, I believe it is crucial to base our decisions on

evidence and data that demonstrate the efficacy of programs. So let’s

discuss the data from our Lower School so you can see the value of our

program and see clearly who will be affected by the decisions you

make today.

Let’s start by taking a deep dive into our performance data. The data for

our lower school shows that we surpass the average achievement in

MCPS in both reading and math. Whereas MCPS shows 46.5% average

achievement in math and 55.3% average achievement in reading, our

average math achievement is 84% and our average reading achievement

is 77%. To break achievement down further, our end of year Dibels data

showed 73% of our first graders and 69% of our second graders reading at

or above grade level. NWEA Spring data shows 64% of our third, fourth,

and fifth graders met proficiency on MAPR . Spring Data for MAPP and

MAPM also show we are achieving better than many schools in MCPS.

72% of our first graders, 74% of our second graders, and 66% of our third

graders met proficiency. An astounding 90% of fourth graders and 89% of

fifth graders receiving virtual instruction in math met proficiency. The data

doesn’t lie, virtual instruction works for elementary students. Our students

are not only thriving but they are exceeding standards.

Voice data also shows how students are building strong relationships

with their peers and teachers and have self-confidence. This is an indicator

that we have created equitable identity-affirming classrooms where

students feel supported and comfortable asking questions . 94% of

our students feel confident that they can do well. 91% of our students said

they had friends in the Virtual Academy and that they had opportunities to

learn about people from a variety of different racial, ethnic, and cultural

backgrounds.

Now let’s look at the demographics of the Virtual Academy. Our student

population is predominantly from the Global Majority (35% Hispanic,

21.4% African American, 24.3 % Caucasian,13.8% Asian, 5.2%

Multi-racial, .2 % American Indian, and.1% Hawaiian/Pacific Islander).

Furthermore, our school has a 67% FARMS rate, yet we do not receive

any Title I funding or benefits.

The Virtual Academy also offers hybrid classes to over 200 elementary

students attending approximately 30 in-person schools. Next year,

our hybrid program was scheduled to expand to over 300 students.

Through this program, we are able to provide instruction in enriched

mathematics. Not only is this a cost savings to the county, as our four

teachers would be equivalent to approximately 20 in person teaching

positions, but let’s take a look at who is benefiting from hybrid instruction.

80% of the schools that utilize hybrid math instruction are Title 1

Schools, with student populations that represent the global majority.

These students would not be receiving enriched math instruction if not for

the Virtual Academy. As you ponder this, think about how many students

are not receiving instruction in enriched literacy (ELC) in these same

schools. Why are these students’ academic needs being ignored?

I ask the board as you deliberate on your decision today to consider your

core purpose of preparing all students to thrive in their future and

your core value of equity. Think very carefully about the students you are

doing harm to if you decide to close the Virtual Academy. Many of them

are students who are financially disadvantaged and represent the global

majority. How does this fit with your values? Each board member has an

opportunity today to show Montgomery County that you are committed to

your core purpose and values. By supporting the Virtual Academy, you

are allowing our students to continue to thrive and you are ensuring

all students have an equitable opportunity for high quality education

in Montgomery County Public Schools

We are asking you to fully fund the Virtual Academy as planned for

grades 2-12 for FY25 and beyond.

https://go.boarddocs.com/mabe/mcpsmd/Board.nsf/files/D64KJ25206F1/$file/Nancy Cipolla Testimony.pdf




The Board of Education refused to let this teacher speak at the Board meeting today. Win win for them.


She submitted written comments.
Forum Index » Montgomery County Public Schools (MCPS)
Go to: