The Cambridges News and Updates ( Prince William, Kate Middleton, George, Charlotte and Louis)

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Something weird seems to be going on with them. I noticed that in the past 6 months their PR machine seems to be very separate. With there being a lot of stories about how essential Kate is to the monarchy and how she’s such a peacemaker and of course with Carole letting her embarrassing brother out of the basement to give Kate focused interviews.

And then there was a weird paragraph in Dan Wotton’s article for their anniversary:

“ Sure, it hasn’t been easy and there have been significant bumps in the road, but I now truly believe they will break the royal marriage curse and stay together for as long as they are both alive”

Just weird to emphasize staying together.

The British tabloids like to threaten people with passive-aggressive BS. 'Stay together' or else. Aside from that Wootton all but confirmed the Rose Hanbury/mistress story. So that's interesting.

I think its just starting to sink in for Kate just how disposable she is. There’s still a healthy dose of denial but it’s there. I doubt William would divorce her before he becomes king—it would be too disruptive, but there’s no guarantee after. And he’s making it clear he’s not going to stop the affairs.

Its a very precarious position to be in. And a few years from now, the same applies for Charlotte and Louis.

It’s comical how delusional Meghan stans are about the Cambridges.

I’m confused. What does any of this have to do with Meghan???

The same Rose Hanbury has to do with the Sussexes?

Dan Wotton said that he heard the Rose Hanbury affair story from an Earl’s daughter. Not exactly Meghan’s set.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Agree with PP. She is lovely and looks fantastic. She does not look like a woman troubled with issues of her husband's affairs.

I remember watching their wedding 10 years ago today. And now I wish them many more years of happiness together!

she's the mother of a future king. She may or may not care about William even existing or not

That’s ridiculous. All of her status and wealth is tied to William. If they divorce, William’s wealth is protected because it’s all inherited. She would get a pittance much like Fergie and even Diana. She is the mother of George so if the monarchy survives she’d be invited to his coronation obviously. However, she would be locked out of every other privilege she currently enjoys — unless William decided to follow Andrew’s lead and allow her to live in one of his houses. Kate is especially vulnerable because her parents also live in one of William’s houses. Though Pippa is pretty wealthy, so they’d be okay.

Anyone saying she doesn’t care about her attachment to William is delusional.

You don't know that. Why not put your fictional writing to good use and write a fan fic?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Agree with PP. She is lovely and looks fantastic. She does not look like a woman troubled with issues of her husband's affairs.

I remember watching their wedding 10 years ago today. And now I wish them many more years of happiness together!

Are you having an affair with William? Do you work for the Royals and have inside knowledge? If not, than keep your day job and stop speculating.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Such a fake picture of them. Posed and horrendous . Why are they trying to copy Meghan Markle and Harry all the time ?

Yes, everything is about Harry and Meghan. Nobody else would take a picture celebrating their 10th anniversary

I think if Meghan and Harry stans can ban anyone who dare "question" the holiness of the Sussex we should be allowed to ban hatred against the Cambridge's as well.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I haven't read through this thread so apologies if this is a repeat... but... isn't today William and Kate's 10th wedding anniversary?

Do we think that they are happily married and all is going well?

They don’t really seem to spend a lot of time together. The video they released today (which I thought was really cute and better than the photos) is from last year and was the same time as their Christmas portraits with all the wood in the background. Seems weird that if you were spending a lot of time together you would have to get as much done as possible in the same go. That said...happily married is relative. Seems like they are both fine with whatever arrangement they have.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Such a fake picture of them. Posed and horrendous . Why are they trying to copy Meghan Markle and Harry all the time ?

Yes, everything is about Harry and Meghan. Nobody else would take a picture celebrating their 10th anniversary

I think if Meghan and Harry stans can ban anyone who dare "question" the holiness of the Sussex we should be allowed to ban hatred against the Cambridge's as well.

That picture is a throwback to one of their publicly-released engagement photos, in which they're standing/posing like that. It was taken in 2010, you know, back when MM was a suitcase girl on Deal or No Deal.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Agree with PP. She is lovely and looks fantastic. She does not look like a woman troubled with issues of her husband's affairs.

I remember watching their wedding 10 years ago today. And now I wish them many more years of happiness together!

she's the mother of a future king. She may or may not care about William even existing or not

That’s ridiculous. All of her status and wealth is tied to William. If they divorce, William’s wealth is protected because it’s all inherited. She would get a pittance much like Fergie and even Diana. She is the mother of George so if the monarchy survives she’d be invited to his coronation obviously. However, she would be locked out of every other privilege she currently enjoys — unless William decided to follow Andrew’s lead and allow her to live in one of his houses. Kate is especially vulnerable because her parents also live in one of William’s houses. Though Pippa is pretty wealthy, so they’d be okay.

Anyone saying she doesn’t care about her attachment to William is delusional.

You don't know that. Why not put your fictional writing to good use and write a fan fic?

Actually, this piece of the puzzle is the only part that is established law. Inheritance is not considered marital property in the UK. William’s wealth is inherited, so it is protected. She would get no claim to his money or property.

If you think being the mother of a king carries any weight post-divorce, you have to look no further than Diana. She produced an heir and a spare and was disposable thereafter.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:No one needs to see his ugly horseface. Bring back someone hot. Sheeet.

It’s just fascinating how much his hair changed his whole appearance. Like his teeth are terrible but somehow they weren’t as noticeable when he had a head full of hair.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Agree with PP. She is lovely and looks fantastic. She does not look like a woman troubled with issues of her husband's affairs.

I remember watching their wedding 10 years ago today. And now I wish them many more years of happiness together!

she's the mother of a future king. She may or may not care about William even existing or not

That’s ridiculous. All of her status and wealth is tied to William. If they divorce, William’s wealth is protected because it’s all inherited. She would get a pittance much like Fergie and even Diana. She is the mother of George so if the monarchy survives she’d be invited to his coronation obviously. However, she would be locked out of every other privilege she currently enjoys — unless William decided to follow Andrew’s lead and allow her to live in one of his houses. Kate is especially vulnerable because her parents also live in one of William’s houses. Though Pippa is pretty wealthy, so they’d be okay.

Anyone saying she doesn’t care about her attachment to William is delusional.

You don't know that. Why not put your fictional writing to good use and write a fan fic?

Actually, this piece of the puzzle is the only part that is established law. Inheritance is not considered marital property in the UK. William’s wealth is inherited, so it is protected. She would get no claim to his money or property.

If you think being the mother of a king carries any weight post-divorce, you have to look no further than Diana. She produced an heir and a spare and was disposable thereafter.

Why are you so obsessed with a potential divorce? If you have something new to add then please do, otherwise you are just regurgitating stale tabloid rumors ad nauseum.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Agree with PP. She is lovely and looks fantastic. She does not look like a woman troubled with issues of her husband's affairs.

I remember watching their wedding 10 years ago today. And now I wish them many more years of happiness together!

she's the mother of a future king. She may or may not care about William even existing or not

That’s ridiculous. All of her status and wealth is tied to William. If they divorce, William’s wealth is protected because it’s all inherited. She would get a pittance much like Fergie and even Diana. She is the mother of George so if the monarchy survives she’d be invited to his coronation obviously. However, she would be locked out of every other privilege she currently enjoys — unless William decided to follow Andrew’s lead and allow her to live in one of his houses. Kate is especially vulnerable because her parents also live in one of William’s houses. Though Pippa is pretty wealthy, so they’d be okay.

Anyone saying she doesn’t care about her attachment to William is delusional.

Kate's parents don't "live in one of William's houses." He gave them some of the money for the down payment as a gift, possibly because they were upgrading to a bigger and more remote house due to privacy and security concerns after Kate joined the BRF.
https://www.usmagazine.com/celebrity-news/news/kate-middleton-and-prince-william-buy-house-for-middletons-2012266/

Property rights don't attach when someone gives money as a gift to buy a home. Kate's parents are successful business owners and are wealthy (at least by normal standards) in their own right. Your suggestion that the Middletons are somehow financially dependent on William is ridiculous.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No one needs to see his ugly horseface. Bring back someone hot. Sheeet.

It’s just fascinating how much his hair changed his whole appearance. Like his teeth are terrible but somehow they weren’t as noticeable when he had a head full of hair.

Hair loss exposed his very tall forehead. As his face appears longer, his teeth appear narrower. That's the optics of it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Agree with PP. She is lovely and looks fantastic. She does not look like a woman troubled with issues of her husband's affairs.

I remember watching their wedding 10 years ago today. And now I wish them many more years of happiness together!

she's the mother of a future king. She may or may not care about William even existing or not

That’s ridiculous. All of her status and wealth is tied to William. If they divorce, William’s wealth is protected because it’s all inherited. She would get a pittance much like Fergie and even Diana. She is the mother of George so if the monarchy survives she’d be invited to his coronation obviously. However, she would be locked out of every other privilege she currently enjoys — unless William decided to follow Andrew’s lead and allow her to live in one of his houses. Kate is especially vulnerable because her parents also live in one of William’s houses. Though Pippa is pretty wealthy, so they’d be okay.

Anyone saying she doesn’t care about her attachment to William is delusional.

You don't know that. Why not put your fictional writing to good use and write a fan fic?

Actually, this piece of the puzzle is the only part that is established law. Inheritance is not considered marital property in the UK. William’s wealth is inherited, so it is protected. She would get no claim to his money or property.

If you think being the mother of a king carries any weight post-divorce, you have to look no further than Diana. She produced an heir and a spare and was disposable thereafter.

Why are you so obsessed with a potential divorce? If you have something new to add then please do, otherwise you are just regurgitating stale tabloid rumors ad nauseum.

DP. Is there some sort of rule that someone can’t make a post about a potential divorce? If you don’t want people to say negative stuff about the Cambridges it would be far more effective if you stopped commenting to shut down everyone with a different opinion of them on each post so that the thread will no longer be at the top.

(Btw all anyone knows about them good or bad are “stale rumors”. Unless you have some sort of inside connection?)

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I haven't read through this thread so apologies if this is a repeat... but... isn't today William and Kate's 10th wedding anniversary?

Do we think that they are happily married and all is going well?

They don’t really seem to spend a lot of time together. The video they released today (which I thought was really cute and better than the photos) is from last year and was the same time as their Christmas portraits with all the wood in the background. Seems weird that if you were spending a lot of time together you would have to get as much done as possible in the same go. That said...happily married is relative. Seems like they are both fine with whatever arrangement they have.

Hmmm do tell us how you know? Are you just spreading gossip or you are living with them? You do know that most people aren't tied at the hip, right?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Agree with PP. She is lovely and looks fantastic. She does not look like a woman troubled with issues of her husband's affairs.

I remember watching their wedding 10 years ago today. And now I wish them many more years of happiness together!

she's the mother of a future king. She may or may not care about William even existing or not

That’s ridiculous. All of her status and wealth is tied to William. If they divorce, William’s wealth is protected because it’s all inherited. She would get a pittance much like Fergie and even Diana. She is the mother of George so if the monarchy survives she’d be invited to his coronation obviously. However, she would be locked out of every other privilege she currently enjoys — unless William decided to follow Andrew’s lead and allow her to live in one of his houses. Kate is especially vulnerable because her parents also live in one of William’s houses. Though Pippa is pretty wealthy, so they’d be okay.

Anyone saying she doesn’t care about her attachment to William is delusional.

Kate's parents don't "live in one of William's houses." He gave them some of the money for the down payment as a gift, possibly because they were upgrading to a bigger and more remote house due to privacy and security concerns after Kate joined the BRF.
https://www.usmagazine.com/celebrity-news/news/kate-middleton-and-prince-william-buy-house-for-middletons-2012266/

Property rights don't attach when someone gives money as a gift to buy a home. Kate's parents are successful business owners and are wealthy (at least by normal standards) in their own right. Your suggestion that the Middletons are somehow financially dependent on William is ridiculous.

Not PP. I agree that he might not have an ownership interest in their home (although we don’t really know how it was structured). But you are seriously delusional if you think her parents are wealthy. If they were they would not need financial assistance to purchase a bigger/more remote house for security concerns or not. Rich people don’t take money from their kids. Slash they would have already had sufficient security in place if they were really that wealthy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Agree with PP. She is lovely and looks fantastic. She does not look like a woman troubled with issues of her husband's affairs.

I remember watching their wedding 10 years ago today. And now I wish them many more years of happiness together!

she's the mother of a future king. She may or may not care about William even existing or not

That’s ridiculous. All of her status and wealth is tied to William. If they divorce, William’s wealth is protected because it’s all inherited. She would get a pittance much like Fergie and even Diana. She is the mother of George so if the monarchy survives she’d be invited to his coronation obviously. However, she would be locked out of every other privilege she currently enjoys — unless William decided to follow Andrew’s lead and allow her to live in one of his houses. Kate is especially vulnerable because her parents also live in one of William’s houses. Though Pippa is pretty wealthy, so they’d be okay.

Anyone saying she doesn’t care about her attachment to William is delusional.

You don't know that. Why not put your fictional writing to good use and write a fan fic?

Actually, this piece of the puzzle is the only part that is established law. Inheritance is not considered marital property in the UK. William’s wealth is inherited, so it is protected. She would get no claim to his money or property.

If you think being the mother of a king carries any weight post-divorce, you have to look no further than Diana. She produced an heir and a spare and was disposable thereafter.

Why are you so obsessed with a potential divorce? If you have something new to add then please do, otherwise you are just regurgitating stale tabloid rumors ad nauseum.

DP. Is there some sort of rule that someone can’t make a post about a potential divorce? If you don’t want people to say negative stuff about the Cambridges it would be far more effective if you stopped commenting to shut down everyone with a different opinion of them on each post so that the thread will no longer be at the top.

(Btw all anyone knows about them good or bad are “stale rumors”. Unless you have some sort of inside connection?)

Oh, so the Meghan stans get all upset with one posting anything they perceived negative ( even if it isn't) and we are the ones who are "obsessive" if you keep repeating things you don't know for sure. My post that was deleted someone mentioned how cute Archie was in the latest picture and I said "how can you tell with the big black hat?" That was seemed negative or when someone wrote "how well adjusted he seems" and I said "how can you tell from a picture?" Both my comments were removed even though I didn't call Archie any names ( I wouldn't because he is an innocent child)

So please don't preach to us, pp.