Alito displayed a “stop the steal” symbol at his home

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Was the Pine Tree flag bad when BLM displayed it, or nah?

Ordinary private citizens aren’t held to judicial standards. There’s no requirement for construction workers or bus drivers or waitresses to be apolitical or to avoid the mere appearance of impropriety.

Isn't Alito's wife one of those private citizens?

She is not really and we’ve explained it to you a million times. It’s too complex for you to grasp - it requires professionalism. Something you don’t expect from your public servants but should.

There is no nuance with "is she a private citizen". It is either yes or no. There is no complexity around it, she is her own person, not property of her husband and is allowed free speech.

As I was saying, you can’t comprehend anything that’s not black and white.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:https://dnyuz.com/2024/05/16/at-justice-alitos-house-a-stop-the-steal-symbol-on-display/

How are Alito and Thomas still on the court?

They are appointed for life and only impeachment or death gets rid of them. I don't have a link but recall reading that Thomas said his lifetime appointment would be his revenge. Roberts is impotent as Chief Justice.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Was the Pine Tree flag bad when BLM displayed it, or nah?

Ordinary private citizens aren’t held to judicial standards. There’s no requirement for construction workers or bus drivers or waitresses to be apolitical or to avoid the mere appearance of impropriety.

Isn't Alito's wife one of those private citizens?

Sure. But how stupid or partisan do you have to be to not recognize or acknowledge that when you live with a Supreme Court Justice, that their impartiality is a major part of their job and that appearances are crucial to letting the public know a judge on the highest court of the land takes that impartiality seriously. Anyone who knows anything about ethics knows that appearances are an important part of the guidelines and you don't do things that could create the appearance of ethics violations even if you believe the act itself does not violate ethics codes. I work at a much lower level of the federal government than the SCOTUS and I receive ethics training annually that emphasizes this aspect of the ethics code. Don't do it if it causes the appearance of ethics violations even if it does not in itself cross over the line.

So she and he are either stupid are insanely partisan. Which is it?

Obviously hyper partisan while not even pretending that they're subject to ethics of any kind. But don't forget the option that he's a coward hiding behind his wife. His finger pointing there is now part of his legacy.

Because obviously his wife, being a woman and all, is incapable of independent thought. Love how democrats show their misogyny without even realizing it.

Men married to female feds are expected the same. You can repeat yourself until you’re blue in the face but everyone actually in high fed positions understands what several of us have told you at least 6 times. You just double down on your ignorance. You’re a know it all that has no idea how little you know.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Was the Pine Tree flag bad when BLM displayed it, or nah?

Ordinary private citizens aren’t held to judicial standards. There’s no requirement for construction workers or bus drivers or waitresses to be apolitical or to avoid the mere appearance of impropriety.

Isn't Alito's wife one of those private citizens?

Because she’s married to a Supreme Court justice, her house is also his house. Her income is also his income and must be reported. She’s not quite a private citizen, but not entirely bound by judicial standards. Fair or not, her activities can cast the appearance of impropriety on him.

You're nutz. She can do as she damn well pleases. She is a PRIVATE CITIZEN.

There is no nuance, regardless of how you would like to project your tyrannical wishes.

This is cut and dry. Got it? CUT AND DRY.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Was the Pine Tree flag bad when BLM displayed it, or nah?

Ordinary private citizens aren’t held to judicial standards. There’s no requirement for construction workers or bus drivers or waitresses to be apolitical or to avoid the mere appearance of impropriety.

Isn't Alito's wife one of those private citizens?

Because she’s married to a Supreme Court justice, her house is also his house. Her income is also his income and must be reported. She’s not quite a private citizen, but not entirely bound by judicial standards. Fair or not, her activities can cast the appearance of impropriety on him.

You're nutz. She can do as she damn well pleases. She is a PRIVATE CITIZEN.

There is no nuance, regardless of how you would like to project your tyrannical wishes.

This is cut and dry. Got it? CUT AND DRY.

No it is not.

Alito should have recused. Full stop.

This is not hard for anyone with a brain.

You are a MAGA MORON.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Was the Pine Tree flag bad when BLM displayed it, or nah?

Ordinary private citizens aren’t held to judicial standards. There’s no requirement for construction workers or bus drivers or waitresses to be apolitical or to avoid the mere appearance of impropriety.

Isn't Alito's wife one of those private citizens?

Because she’s married to a Supreme Court justice, her house is also his house. Her income is also his income and must be reported. She’s not quite a private citizen, but not entirely bound by judicial standards. Fair or not, her activities can cast the appearance of impropriety on him.

You're nutz. She can do as she damn well pleases. She is a PRIVATE CITIZEN.

There is no nuance, regardless of how you would like to project your tyrannical wishes.

This is cut and dry. Got it? CUT AND DRY.

You are mistaken but as you are also dumber than a box of rocks, you are incapable of understanding the poster to whom you are shouting. I might add that shouting only makes you look pathetic.

[Anonymous]

ALITO would not allow you to fly any flag after 2025.

Recusal for his bias of changing the US into a Chrisitan Nationalist regime.

And his wife putting that up all by herself is utter BS. But sure let's belive that garbage he still needed to recuse.

Alito was the Jan 6th guy full stop he was in on the coup and the only reason he is not in jail is Garland.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Was the Pine Tree flag bad when BLM displayed it, or nah?

Ordinary private citizens aren’t held to judicial standards. There’s no requirement for construction workers or bus drivers or waitresses to be apolitical or to avoid the mere appearance of impropriety.

Isn't Alito's wife one of those private citizens?

Because she’s married to a Supreme Court justice, her house is also his house. Her income is also his income and must be reported. She’s not quite a private citizen, but not entirely bound by judicial standards. Fair or not, her activities can cast the appearance of impropriety on him.

You're nutz. She can do as she damn well pleases. She is a PRIVATE CITIZEN.

There is no nuance, regardless of how you would like to project your tyrannical wishes.

This is cut and dry. Got it? CUT AND DRY.

You Republicans would go NUTS if Justice Jackson’s husband flew a Black Lives Matters flag. Or a Palestinian flag (and yes I know he’s Jewish). Admit it.

And yes I think it would be wrong for him to do that.

And even though I think the rainbow flag is neutral - it’s a joyful symbol of human rights and who doesn’t support those? - if Justice Jackson was going to be hearing a case involving gay rights it would be absolutely wrong for him to fly that at their home.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Was the Pine Tree flag bad when BLM displayed it, or nah?

Ordinary private citizens aren’t held to judicial standards. There’s no requirement for construction workers or bus drivers or waitresses to be apolitical or to avoid the mere appearance of impropriety.

Isn't Alito's wife one of those private citizens?

Because she’s married to a Supreme Court justice, her house is also his house. Her income is also his income and must be reported. She’s not quite a private citizen, but not entirely bound by judicial standards. Fair or not, her activities can cast the appearance of impropriety on him.

You're nutz. She can do as she damn well pleases. She is a PRIVATE CITIZEN.

There is no nuance, regardless of how you would like to project your tyrannical wishes.

This is cut and dry. Got it? CUT AND DRY.

No it is not.

Alito should have recused. Full stop.

This is not hard for anyone with a brain.

You are a MAGA MORON.

No, you're just trying to tip the court, because you know this November it's curtains for you and all your ideological idiocy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Was the Pine Tree flag bad when BLM displayed it, or nah?

Ordinary private citizens aren’t held to judicial standards. There’s no requirement for construction workers or bus drivers or waitresses to be apolitical or to avoid the mere appearance of impropriety.

Isn't Alito's wife one of those private citizens?

Because she’s married to a Supreme Court justice, her house is also his house. Her income is also his income and must be reported. She’s not quite a private citizen, but not entirely bound by judicial standards. Fair or not, her activities can cast the appearance of impropriety on him.

You're nutz. She can do as she damn well pleases. She is a PRIVATE CITIZEN.

There is no nuance, regardless of how you would like to project your tyrannical wishes.

This is cut and dry. Got it? CUT AND DRY.

You Republicans would go NUTS if Justice Jackson’s husband flew a Black Lives Matters flag. Or a Palestinian flag (and yes I know he’s Jewish). Admit it.

And yes I think it would be wrong for him to do that.

And even though I think the rainbow flag is neutral - it’s a joyful symbol of human rights and who doesn’t support those? - if Justice Jackson was going to be hearing a case involving gay rights it would be absolutely wrong for him to fly that at their home.

I'm the same poster and no it would not be wrong. You better start taking the RIGHTS of individuals seriously.

The Constitution is a negative-check against the government. Get that thru your thick head.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Was the Pine Tree flag bad when BLM displayed it, or nah?

Ordinary private citizens aren’t held to judicial standards. There’s no requirement for construction workers or bus drivers or waitresses to be apolitical or to avoid the mere appearance of impropriety.

Isn't Alito's wife one of those private citizens?

Sure. But how stupid or partisan do you have to be to not recognize or acknowledge that when you live with a Supreme Court Justice, that their impartiality is a major part of their job and that appearances are crucial to letting the public know a judge on the highest court of the land takes that impartiality seriously. Anyone who knows anything about ethics knows that appearances are an important part of the guidelines and you don't do things that could create the appearance of ethics violations even if you believe the act itself does not violate ethics codes. I work at a much lower level of the federal government than the SCOTUS and I receive ethics training annually that emphasizes this aspect of the ethics code. Don't do it if it causes the appearance of ethics violations even if it does not in itself cross over the line.

So she and he are either stupid are insanely partisan. Which is it?

Obviously hyper partisan while not even pretending that they're subject to ethics of any kind. But don't forget the option that he's a coward hiding behind his wife. His finger pointing there is now part of his legacy.

Because obviously his wife, being a woman and all, is incapable of independent thought. Love how democrats show their misogyny without even realizing it.

Men married to female feds are expected the same. You can repeat yourself until you’re blue in the face but everyone actually in high fed positions understands what several of us have told you at least 6 times. You just double down on your ignorance. You’re a know it all that has no idea how little you know.

TY. People here showing that they know nothing about the standards feds, appointees, and their families strive to adhere to in keeping with the oath they take to defend the Constitution against all enemies, “foreign and domestic.”

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Was the Pine Tree flag bad when BLM displayed it, or nah?

Ordinary private citizens aren’t held to judicial standards. There’s no requirement for construction workers or bus drivers or waitresses to be apolitical or to avoid the mere appearance of impropriety.

Isn't Alito's wife one of those private citizens?

Because she’s married to a Supreme Court justice, her house is also his house. Her income is also his income and must be reported. She’s not quite a private citizen, but not entirely bound by judicial standards. Fair or not, her activities can cast the appearance of impropriety on him.

You're nutz. She can do as she damn well pleases. She is a PRIVATE CITIZEN.

There is no nuance, regardless of how you would like to project your tyrannical wishes.

This is cut and dry. Got it? CUT AND DRY.

You Republicans would go NUTS if Justice Jackson’s husband flew a Black Lives Matters flag. Or a Palestinian flag (and yes I know he’s Jewish). Admit it.

And yes I think it would be wrong for him to do that.

And even though I think the rainbow flag is neutral - it’s a joyful symbol of human rights and who doesn’t support those? - if Justice Jackson was going to be hearing a case involving gay rights it would be absolutely wrong for him to fly that at their home.

I'm the same poster and no it would not be wrong. You better start taking the RIGHTS of individuals seriously.

The Constitution is a negative-check against the government. Get that thru your thick head.

Speaking of a thick head, you’re really struggling and completely unaware as you support a fascist regime.

[Anonymous]

Was Alito picked on in school?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Was the Pine Tree flag bad when BLM displayed it, or nah?

Ordinary private citizens aren’t held to judicial standards. There’s no requirement for construction workers or bus drivers or waitresses to be apolitical or to avoid the mere appearance of impropriety.

Isn't Alito's wife one of those private citizens?

Sure. But how stupid or partisan do you have to be to not recognize or acknowledge that when you live with a Supreme Court Justice, that their impartiality is a major part of their job and that appearances are crucial to letting the public know a judge on the highest court of the land takes that impartiality seriously. Anyone who knows anything about ethics knows that appearances are an important part of the guidelines and you don't do things that could create the appearance of ethics violations even if you believe the act itself does not violate ethics codes. I work at a much lower level of the federal government than the SCOTUS and I receive ethics training annually that emphasizes this aspect of the ethics code. Don't do it if it causes the appearance of ethics violations even if it does not in itself cross over the line.

So she and he are either stupid are insanely partisan. Which is it?

Obviously hyper partisan while not even pretending that they're subject to ethics of any kind. But don't forget the option that he's a coward hiding behind his wife. His finger pointing there is now part of his legacy.

Because obviously his wife, being a woman and all, is incapable of independent thought. Love how democrats show their misogyny without even realizing it.

Men married to female feds are expected the same. You can repeat yourself until you’re blue in the face but everyone actually in high fed positions understands what several of us have told you at least 6 times. You just double down on your ignorance. You’re a know it all that has no idea how little you know.

TY. People here showing that they know nothing about the standards feds, appointees, and their families strive to adhere to in keeping with the oath they take to defend the Constitution against all enemies, “foreign and domestic.”

Show me where feds or appointee spouses and children are required to give the same oath and rules as the civil servant spouse or parent.

I have friends that are Biden appointees and none of my friends wives had to take an oath or sign away their private citizen status.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Was the Pine Tree flag bad when BLM displayed it, or nah?

Ordinary private citizens aren’t held to judicial standards. There’s no requirement for construction workers or bus drivers or waitresses to be apolitical or to avoid the mere appearance of impropriety.

Isn't Alito's wife one of those private citizens?

Sure. But how stupid or partisan do you have to be to not recognize or acknowledge that when you live with a Supreme Court Justice, that their impartiality is a major part of their job and that appearances are crucial to letting the public know a judge on the highest court of the land takes that impartiality seriously. Anyone who knows anything about ethics knows that appearances are an important part of the guidelines and you don't do things that could create the appearance of ethics violations even if you believe the act itself does not violate ethics codes. I work at a much lower level of the federal government than the SCOTUS and I receive ethics training annually that emphasizes this aspect of the ethics code. Don't do it if it causes the appearance of ethics violations even if it does not in itself cross over the line.

So she and he are either stupid are insanely partisan. Which is it?

Obviously hyper partisan while not even pretending that they're subject to ethics of any kind. But don't forget the option that he's a coward hiding behind his wife. His finger pointing there is now part of his legacy.

Because obviously his wife, being a woman and all, is incapable of independent thought. Love how democrats show their misogyny without even realizing it.

Men married to female feds are expected the same. You can repeat yourself until you’re blue in the face but everyone actually in high fed positions understands what several of us have told you at least 6 times. You just double down on your ignorance. You’re a know it all that has no idea how little you know.

TY. People here showing that they know nothing about the standards feds, appointees, and their families strive to adhere to in keeping with the oath they take to defend the Constitution against all enemies, “foreign and domestic.”

Show me where feds or appointee spouses and children are required to give the same oath and rules as the civil servant spouse or parent.

I have friends that are Biden appointees and none of my friends wives had to take an oath or sign away their private citizen status.

They are not your friends or you would understand what we’ve been telling you. You are obtuse.