Barbie trailer

Anonymous
I loved the movie. It wildly exceeded my expectations, which were pretty low.

It was clever and funny and lightweight with a teensy bit of preachiness, but nothing overwhelming, and all was said with a wink.

I loved every second of it, and I'd go see it again. Ryan Gosling was amazing!! I didn't know he could sing, dance AND act!! He's a very talented performer!! And he's got great comic timing!
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:I loved the movie. It wildly exceeded my expectations, which were pretty low.

It was clever and funny and lightweight with a teensy bit of preachiness, but nothing overwhelming, and all was said with a wink.

I loved every second of it, and I'd go see it again. Ryan Gosling was amazing!! I didn't know he could sing, dance AND act!! He's a very talented performer!! And he's got great comic timing!


Completely agree - I’d definitely see it again. And agree on Ryan Gosling. He was a revelation for me.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:I loved the movie. It wildly exceeded my expectations, which were pretty low.

It was clever and funny and lightweight with a teensy bit of preachiness, but nothing overwhelming, and all was said with a wink.

I loved every second of it, and I'd go see it again. Ryan Gosling was amazing!! I didn't know he could sing, dance AND act!! He's a very talented performer!! And he's got great comic timing!


So you never saw La La Land?
Anonymous
I just watched it this evening.

The best part for me was the monologue. I'm having a hard time at work trying to balance being supportive and flexible, yet a leader and decision-maker, as a supervisor so it really spoke to me.

"It is literally impossible to be a woman. You are so beautiful, and so smart, and it kills me that you don't think you're good enough. Like, we have to always be extraordinary, but somehow we're always doing it wrong.

You have to be thin, but not too thin. And you can never say you want to be thin. You have to say you want to be healthy, but also you have to be thin. You have to have money, but you can't ask for money because that's crass. You have to be a boss, but you can't be mean. You have to lead, but you can't squash other people's ideas. You're supposed to love being a mother, but don't talk about your kids all the damn time. You have to be a career woman but also always be looking out for other people. You have to answer for men's bad behavior, which is insane, but if you point that out, you're accused of complaining. You're supposed to stay pretty for men, but not so pretty that you tempt them too much or that you threaten other women because you're supposed to be a part of the sisterhood.

But always stand out and always be grateful. But never forget that the system is rigged. So find a way to acknowledge that but also always be grateful. You have to never get old, never be rude, never show off, never be selfish, never fall down, never fail, never show fear, never get out of line.

It's too hard! It's too contradictory and nobody gives you a medal or says thank you! And it turns out, in fact, that not only are you doing everything wrong, but also everything is your fault.

I'm just so tired of watching myself and every single other woman tie herself into knots so that people will like us. And if all of that is also true for a doll just representing women, then I don't even know."
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:This is pg-13. Who will go? Surely not enough adults to make it a success.


Yes, a lot of people are excited about this movie. It's a weird concept with fantastic marketing, and indie movie royalty writing and directing. If it gets bad reviews, then sure no one will see it - it'll be another Babylon. If it gets good reviews, it'll be huge - and might even get Oscars.


It’s going to flop - mark my words.

This aged well.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Anyone bummed they didn’t get together in the end?

I think they missed an opportunity for Barbie to realize how self-centered she was in terms of taking Ken for granted.


No, not at all bummed. “True love” isn’t the only answer to having a fulfilling life. Ken was an abusive stalker. He shouldn’t be rewarded for that. Barbie should have apologized and did, but she doesn’t owe him a relationship.


Huh? He was just an airhead dud.


And Barbie was a valid, self-centered, materialistic twit who completely lacked any awareness. But she seemingly grew throughout the movie…so why couldn’t his character grow?


He can, and did, I think. Doesn’t mean she should be his girlfriend.


+1. My daughter had a very good male friend who started seeing her as more than a friend about 6 months ago. She was honest with him that she did not return the feelings and they stayed very close. Recently he blew up at her and ended their friendship because (I kid you not) “she should have changed her mind by now.”

No one owes another person romantic feelings, even if that person is a wonderful friend. I think it was really important they didn’t get together and for Ken to understand that simply being someone’s friend or liking them obligated them to one day feel more.


I had a male best friend for six years who did the same thing. Doesn’t make him abusive. He was in love with me. He dated other women but always hoped I’d change my mind. He got pretty upset with me one night. It was pretty upsetting. And he was angry but he wasn’t harmful to me.

Life went on and we married other people. He’s a wonderful person and father of three. Not an abusive jerk.

I’ve been happily married 16 years. My husband and I saw Barbie together. We felt pretty sad that they chose for Barbie and Ken to not end up together. Felt like it it was a missed moment to show how men and women can develop understanding and evolve together.

Not really surprising though. This was made by Gerwig and Baumbach. I generally find both of their movies and takes on romantic relationships insufferable.



Putting Barbie and Ken together would have ruined the entire movie. Barbie was adamant that she did not feel that way about Ken. Honestly he probably only had feelings for her because he based his whole "life" on her. Idk, I really hate when movies feel the need to force a relationship as if the only happy ending is a partnered one. This seems a very old fashioned way of thinking that women need a man. Maybe Barbie is gay... she did like having girls night every night ;)
Barbie got her happy ending and Ken probably got his own in Barbieland.


Agreed. They were barely friends. No need for her to abruptly love him.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:This is pg-13. Who will go? Surely not enough adults to make it a success.


Yes, a lot of people are excited about this movie. It's a weird concept with fantastic marketing, and indie movie royalty writing and directing. If it gets bad reviews, then sure no one will see it - it'll be another Babylon. If it gets good reviews, it'll be huge - and might even get Oscars.


It’s going to flop - mark my words.

This aged well.


Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Anyone bummed they didn’t get together in the end?

I think they missed an opportunity for Barbie to realize how self-centered she was in terms of taking Ken for granted.


No, not at all bummed. “True love” isn’t the only answer to having a fulfilling life. Ken was an abusive stalker. He shouldn’t be rewarded for that. Barbie should have apologized and did, but she doesn’t owe him a relationship.


Huh? He was just an airhead dud.


And Barbie was a valid, self-centered, materialistic twit who completely lacked any awareness. But she seemingly grew throughout the movie…so why couldn’t his character grow?


He can, and did, I think. Doesn’t mean she should be his girlfriend.


+1. My daughter had a very good male friend who started seeing her as more than a friend about 6 months ago. She was honest with him that she did not return the feelings and they stayed very close. Recently he blew up at her and ended their friendship because (I kid you not) “she should have changed her mind by now.”

No one owes another person romantic feelings, even if that person is a wonderful friend. I think it was really important they didn’t get together and for Ken to understand that simply being someone’s friend or liking them obligated them to one day feel more.


I had a male best friend for six years who did the same thing. Doesn’t make him abusive. He was in love with me. He dated other women but always hoped I’d change my mind. He got pretty upset with me one night. It was pretty upsetting. And he was angry but he wasn’t harmful to me.

Life went on and we married other people. He’s a wonderful person and father of three. Not an abusive jerk.

I’ve been happily married 16 years. My husband and I saw Barbie together. We felt pretty sad that they chose for Barbie and Ken to not end up together. Felt like it it was a missed moment to show how men and women can develop understanding and evolve together.

Not really surprising though. This was made by Gerwig and Baumbach. I generally find both of their movies and takes on romantic relationships insufferable.



Putting Barbie and Ken together would have ruined the entire movie. Barbie was adamant that she did not feel that way about Ken. Honestly he probably only had feelings for her because he based his whole "life" on her. Idk, I really hate when movies feel the need to force a relationship as if the only happy ending is a partnered one. This seems a very old fashioned way of thinking that women need a man. Maybe Barbie is gay... she did like having girls night every night ;)
Barbie got her happy ending and Ken probably got his own in Barbieland.


Agreed. They were barely friends. No need for her to abruptly love him.


He was a hilarious character, but clearly the embodiment of how girls play with dolls. Ken gets thrown in the box with the Breyer horses 90% of the time. Barbie may be a caricature but at least the girls are invested in her and draw her out. Ken isn't an equal he's an accessory (and a low value one). Nothing wrong with little girls inhabiting that reality, so of course Barbie doesn't take him. As a girl emerges from that world, no need for baggage. At the middle school in the real world, there are also no guys (with lines).
Anonymous
I loved it too. And that P&P reference sealed it.
Anonymous
Looks like Barbie has already grossed more than 850 million and is on track to pass a billion sometime next week.

https://www.boxofficemojo.com/release/rl1077904129/?ref_=bo_da_table_1

So much for "go woke, go broke"
Anonymous
The silent majority loves a fun summer movie!
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Looks like Barbie has already grossed more than 850 million and is on track to pass a billion sometime next week.

https://www.boxofficemojo.com/release/rl1077904129/?ref_=bo_da_table_1

So much for "go woke, go broke"


Not so fast. Look at how Disney movies are doing this year.
Anonymous
Barbie made a billion!
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Looks like Barbie has already grossed more than 850 million and is on track to pass a billion sometime next week.

https://www.boxofficemojo.com/release/rl1077904129/?ref_=bo_da_table_1

So much for "go woke, go broke"


Not so fast. Look at how Disney movies are doing this year.


Ehhh, Disney’s live action remakes have flopped long before people decided the company was woke.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Looks like Barbie has already grossed more than 850 million and is on track to pass a billion sometime next week.

https://www.boxofficemojo.com/release/rl1077904129/?ref_=bo_da_table_1

So much for "go woke, go broke"


Not so fast. Look at how Disney movies are doing this year.


Ehhh, Disney’s live action remakes have flopped long before people decided the company was woke.


Elemental and Indiana Jones flopped too. It's not just the live action.
post reply Forum Index » Entertainment and Pop Culture
Message Quick Reply
Go to: