| My child received merit aid from Pitt, Indiana, UGA, USC (Trojans NOT Gamecocks), and Richmond. |
| I would encourage my kid to apply ED to a "high match" but not a reach school. The ED numbers for reaches are skewed by athletic recruits and at the end of it all, the bump she got (if any) from ED at her reach was minimal. Meanwhile, the ED deferrals of the other kids at her matches made for a competitive regular decision round and ultimately resulted in rejections from her matches when Naviance showed her to be well within the range. In hindsight, I would have suggested an ED to her top match school. |
| When you realize that acceptance rates are not a measure of educational quality or outcomes, it makes the process a lot easier. |
|
I found the Jeff Seligo book eye-opening. Some of it I already knew, but it never occurred to me how much a kid’s chosen major could factor into the admissions decision.
I’m glad my senior DC didn’t want to major in STEM! 😁 |
|
Recalibrate expectations.
Instead of going whole hog for Michigan or UCLA, adjust to schools like South Carolina and GA. For SLACs, ignore the top ones, and start looking into those ranked 30-50. If you don't need FA, go ED to the private schools like Tulane, Northeastern and others who play the USNWR yield game. |
It is, but there are 30,000-50,000 kids with the same stats applying to the same schools. and that doesn't factor donors, athletes, URM, first Gen, legacies etc. |
+1 Wish someone had told us this very, very very important piece of information. |
Yup. All the high stats kids look alike, frankly - that is why it is a lottery. There is no magic answer, but some parents think they can "find" it somewhere. |
savage |
Sorry, can you explain what this means? |
You can do this?? I didn't even know that. |
Probably healthy for your daughter to have that disappointment at age 17/18. Life can have many disappointments like that and it’s nice if she can learn to cope while under your roof. |
I mean, couldn't you figure this out by looking at the acceptance rate? I sort of feel like a student that aspires to a top school should have this level of critical thinking skills. There are thousands of smart kids with strong GPAs and test scores that are the captain of their debate team or 3-letter varsity sports or whatever. These kids are populating every school not just in the USA but around the world. And some of them are publishing books or winning national science prizes or going to the Olympics or finding ways to electrify their rural villages with solar power or whatever on top of all that. The mistake is to not understand the level of competition that is out there and to overestimate your own child's achievements. |
That doesn’t make any sense it’s the top students that should avoid as the yield protection will trigger a potential denial versus the kid in their sweet spot which isn’t going to be an outlier on either end |
| Stop the “dream school” madness |