Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I feel sorry for her 8 kids. They were “homeschooled” by this nut. Apparently her oldest children are now adults. I wonder how well they function in society?
I can’t imagine being 40 years old and having adult children in today’s day and age. That meant she was a teen parent homeschooling little kids. What a drain on society.
From the New Yorker article she had her first child at 16. Why does PA allow uneducated people to home school? They surely will be a drain on society. As a single mother her only employment seems to be reselling yogurt and cheese at farmer's markets. I wonder how much welfare she gets from the government she wants to over throw. I'm not slamming poor people; I'm slamming a hypocrite.
+1
People like her are also why I can't get behind Romney's 'Child' Plan. She would get $3,000 a year PER kid until each one turns 18. You're telling me a anarchist with no redeeming qualities or contributions to society who is already on welfare deserves $24,000 a year for two decades because....she's fertile?
I think she does. It’s less about her and more about the children. But at the end of the day, do I think she deserves that money for that reason? I do. Study after study shows that money is usually spent on basic household needs. And that is what this is about at the end of the day—not about redeeming qualities. We were on assistance growing up and so was about half of my extended family (my cousins ). And it did exactly what is was supposed to because now, in our 40s, you can’t tell the difference between those of us who had the help and those who didn’t. Everyone is middle class or upper class. The benefits just put a floor under our feet, so the speak, so that we could focus on school and work. When I reflect on that, if the families who got the benefits hadn’t had them, I don’t think we would’ve been able to establish middle class lives.
I think you are missing the point.
That woman is an insurrectionist yet she may be living on welfare. You don't see the dichotomy there?
I also grew up lower income, and at one point when my dad got laid off, we had to go on food stamps. I now have about $3mil net worth and have paid back in taxes more than 10 fold. So yea, I agree that those kinds of programs can indeed benefit many people in aiding them getting out of poverty. But, she supports a political leader who wants to gut the very programs you say helps people, like her kids.