Do I have cankles?

Anonymous
They.are.freaking,ankles!!!!!!!
Anonymous
I have cankles (and pronated flat feet) and I say yes you have cankles but it’s not a big deal. No one actually cares or notices. I mean unless you are trying to fit into an ankle bracelet, embrace the cank honey!
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:They.are.freaking,cankles!!!!!!!

Agreed.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:They.are.freaking,cankles!!!!!!!

Agreed.




Either way, not a big deal.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:They.are.freaking,cankles!!!!!!!

Agreed.

Either way, not a big deal.

Of course not. But the people twisting themselves into a pretzel pretending there is any ankle definition really need to get some help for their body dysmorphia.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:A lot of people on this thread do not know what cankles are.

OP does not have big ankle bones, and/or her ankle bone is hidden under a little fat so they look soft, so maybe this is where the confusion lies. Her ankles are significantly narrower than her calves, therefore they are NOT cankles.

I remember one of my mom’s friend’s cankles. She was average height and weight, maybe in the thin side, and was a avid runner. But her calves seemed to go all the way to her feet without narrowing. Those are cankles.

You need to get your eyes checked. Her legs are a straight line from calf to what should be an ankle.


You need to get your eyes checked! Seriously, get a ruler. Significant difference. Not cankles.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:They.are.freaking,cankles!!!!!!!

Agreed.

Either way, not a big deal.

Of course not. But the people twisting themselves into a pretzel pretending there is any ankle definition really need to get some help for their body dysmorphia.


+1
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:A lot of people on this thread do not know what cankles are.

OP does not have big ankle bones, and/or her ankle bone is hidden under a little fat so they look soft, so maybe this is where the confusion lies. Her ankles are significantly narrower than her calves, therefore they are NOT cankles.

I remember one of my mom’s friend’s cankles. She was average height and weight, maybe in the thin side, and was a avid runner. But her calves seemed to go all the way to her feet without narrowing. Those are cankles.

You need to get your eyes checked. Her legs are a straight line from calf to what should be an ankle.


You need to get your eyes checked! Seriously, get a ruler. Significant difference. Not cankles.
.

You must have cankles or date cankled women. Either way you need your eyes checked. You have beer goggle syndrome.
Anonymous
I'm also on team No, OP doesn't have cankles. My husband is really fit and he has cankles. They're super ugly. Calf and ankle are the same size, no tapering in at the ankle. It was hard to look past when we first started dating.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:A lot of people on this thread do not know what cankles are.

OP does not have big ankle bones, and/or her ankle bone is hidden under a little fat so they look soft, so maybe this is where the confusion lies. Her ankles are significantly narrower than her calves, therefore they are NOT cankles.

I remember one of my mom’s friend’s cankles. She was average height and weight, maybe in the thin side, and was a avid runner. But her calves seemed to go all the way to her feet without narrowing. Those are cankles.

You need to get your eyes checked. Her legs are a straight line from calf to what should be an ankle.

You need to get your eyes checked! Seriously, get a ruler. Significant difference. Not cankles.

Just did it on Friday which is why I can see that those are clear cankles. You have a very cleared distorted view if the human body to their their is a defined ankle there.
Anonymous
No thank God. I do have flat feet. Not cute either.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:I'm also on team No, OP doesn't have cankles. My husband is really fit and he has cankles. They're super ugly. Calf and ankle are the same size, no tapering in at the ankle. It was hard to look past when we first started dating.


My dad has the opposite problem with chicken legs. Sometimes you just can’t win with ankles
Anonymous
They taper in, then out= not cankles. Cankles kind of pop out at you when you see them- your ankles don't.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:A lot of people on this thread do not know what cankles are.

OP does not have big ankle bones, and/or her ankle bone is hidden under a little fat so they look soft, so maybe this is where the confusion lies. Her ankles are significantly narrower than her calves, therefore they are NOT cankles.

I remember one of my mom’s friend’s cankles. She was average height and weight, maybe in the thin side, and was a avid runner. But her calves seemed to go all the way to her feet without narrowing. Those are cankles.

You need to get your eyes checked. Her legs are a straight line from calf to what should be an ankle.

You need to get your eyes checked! Seriously, get a ruler. Significant difference. Not cankles.

Just did it on Friday which is why I can see that those are clear cankles. You have a very cleared distorted view if the human body to their their is a defined ankle there.


DP. Disagree, those are no cankles.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:They taper in, then out= not cankles. Cankles kind of pop out at you when you see them- your ankles don't.


Ok let's put this to rest. She has cankles. Here is a woman with cankles before surgery and after with no cankles. Cankles are thick ankles.

post reply Forum Index » Off-Topic
Message Quick Reply
Go to: