What's your plan, here? If your residence is in DC, you're exempt from federal income taxes? Wouldn't it be less complicated to just make DC a state already? |
Or we just keep our status of non-voting representation in Congress and the spigot stays open. Seems like a fair trade. |
Aside from that whole Taxation Without Representation thing. |
What spigot are you talking about? Federal money for housing, education and transportation goes to every state. D.C. doesn't get that money because it's not a state, and it wouldn't get less of it (or more of it) if we were a state. |
Puerto Ricans don't pay federal tax. And they are the same status as DC. Years ago, republicans actually warmed up to this idea , including Newt Gingrich, and bascially making DC a tax haven |
why would you not support statehood? |
Puerto Ricans pay tax to Puerto Rico. That is similar to US tax tables not Florida. However in 2019 Puerto Rico launched Act No. 60 of 2019, known as the Puerto Rico Incentives Code to attract individual resident investors and businesses. People and businesses that contribute alot but do not use resources. We know people who were from Puerto Rico or their parents etc . Retiree is better off in Florida. |
|
The whole premise of this is bullshit. DC was intended to be a Federal District, not a state. It is this way in an attempt to keep it objective to state issues, and so the US Capitol did not "belong" to any state.
They have representation in Congress, to say otherwise is an outright lie. This is just a Democrat power grab in an attempt to add more Electoral votes. |
You don’t get it. Companies don’t have to be in DC. They would just move their offices to VA. |
Companies don't have to be in NYC or SF either, and yet they are. If a commuter tax were enough to make them to move to Virginia, they'd be in Virginia already. |
??????????????????????????????????????? The remarkable thing about the "This is just a Democratic power grab" argument is that evidently the Republicans making it believe there is nothing they could do that would persuade DC residents to vote Republican. That's how little faith the Republicans have in their own principles and policies. |
That's a poor comparison. A company being in the District versus Arlington or Bethesda would provide the same sort of office type, same geographical experience, same transit options, and would attract similar types of employees. SF vs. Oakland: totally different and separated by a large bay and bridge. SF vs. Palo Alto: too far away from each other. NYC vs. Hoboken/Jersey City: some similarities but the critical mass of business and amenities puts Manhattan in its own class. |
Yes, when you exaggerate the differences, the differences look bigger. As for NYC vs Hoboken, one could say exactly the same thing about DC vs. Arlington or Bethesda: some similarities but the critical mass of business and amenities puts DC in its own class. |
Congratulations you’ve won the stupidest argument award. We do not have voting representation. Read a book. |
Thats true for lobbying where proximity to Congress is important. Most other private employers are concentrated in Va or Md simply because there is more space. Also federal employees who work in the carved out new federal district would not pay the commuter tax. That would include Congress, The White House complex, and agencies in federal triangle and along the south side of the mall. DC’s height restrictions prevented DC from becoming the Manhattan of the region — too late now. Im not sure the commuter tax would provide enough funds to cover the costs of courts, tuition assistance grants, and other programs currently funded by the Federal government. DC would likely need to increase income and/property taxes. |