Do you mean racial bias or sexual preference? |
Some refs would compliment our team on their aggressive possession of the ball. Others acted like touching a player was a violation. In possession soccer there is a lot of close contact. With long ball it’s like kick it long and run. We even had a hard time with parents that just didn’t understand you can use your body, it’s legal. Teams also in more rural areas are more annoyed by Hispanic teams, lots of racist comments on the field. Some refs really understood, but the majority just treated the kids like they were thugs. I know the assignor for one league but not EDP I would send her video clips of the issues. I figured you had some inside conversations with other refs that might comment about certain teams. I think it is fair all EDP refs do other leagues but I don’t think all NCSl refs do EDP . Also had great refs in Super Y. It was enough of an issue they would not assign our team to certain refs. |
So you admit there is racial bias but you only saw it once snd it was a Hispanic ref? No I don’t cheat on my taxes, do you? |
2 ref system has each ref take one half and they run opposite diagonals and call OOB and offsides for their half. They share foul calling duties with the ref closer to the play taking the lead. |
| Was playing indoor one time and I saw a middle eastern guy from the other team call the black ref the “n” word. Years ago. The ref hauled off and smacked the player and called the match. Amazing. Plus we were up by one goal so we won the league finals. |
|
Two things that I struggle with.
There are obvious instances of players flopping for a call, especially a penalty or trying to draw a card. Do you not anticipate this and why not hand out more simulations? How do you handle a missed call, especially one a major one that you've made and can't reverse? I have seen referees get into more trouble doubling down on a bad call and letting the game get out of hand. I realize that you can't go back and fix the call. But they don't seem to realize the bad call has heightened the temperature of the game, especially with the team impacted. Saw the worst example of this last week. Ref called a pass back to goalie that was not a pass back. Other team grabs the ball from the goalie and plays in into the net (I don't blame them) in the ensuing chaos. He runs over to the AR and then gives the goal. Immediately, the game devolves. Instead of trying to calm the game, he just starts carding everyone on every sign of contact. Then sends off a kid for asking him a question and threatens to send off anyone else. Told everyone "you can't play the game without me." Finally he calls the game with 15 minutes and hightails it out to his car. |
So you either are blind to it or just don’t want to admit it. Oh well so much for ask anything. Maybe do an anonymous one so you can be more transparent. Cheers... see you in the pitch. |
I video the games and show them to the person who manages complaints. I even had the assignor and a referee trainer attend a game to see for themselves. So I don’t actually make the call. There are other racist things ive have caught refs doing on camera and have reported them for that too. I’m sure they were glad when my son finally went off to college, so I didn’t report it anymore. We eventually got to a point where the assignor just hand picked refs for us. |
I don't want to dress the game you describe at the bottom - it sounds insane. But to your top two questions: 1. Flopping. The reality is, simulation isn't as common as you think, and very few kids can really pull it off. You may feel something was simulation because there was no contact or it wasn't (in your option) enough, or the defender "got the ball". By the laws of the game, the fact that a defender gets the ball, or that there was no contact doesn't mean there wasn't a foul. If a defender goes for the leg and the attacking player jumps over but then stumbles and falls, that's not simulation, that's a foul. Note that Law 12 very explicitly says "trips or attempts to trip". And yes, I recognize that there are times that a kid will simulate, but if it's a close call, you may see a ref call it based on the fact that the player has been committing multiple similar infractions. Remember, we can give a caution for "persistent offences", and there is no specific number of offenses to trigger that. 2. Bad/Missed calls. I've made them, every ref I know has made them. In general you try to just move on. I think trying to do a tit-for-tat always backfires. All you can do is try and not make any more mistakes. That said, we are human, and if we realize we blew a big call, and there's something that doesn't impact the safety of the players I am sure that refs might allow the team who was harmed by a bad call a smidge of leeway. I am not condoning it, nor should we as refs ever do it, but it probably happens subconciously. |
I'm really sorry that happened to you, and that's never acceptable. I do my best to pay attention to how I or my AR or CR communicates with players no matter their race, but I am sure we can all do better. Frankly given the Ref shortage, it's really hard to get rid of the bad actors. |
| I'm not a ref but I don't understand how refs don't call more fouls when a defender say slide tackles, gets the ball but then takes out the player. THAT"S A FOUL! just because he got the ball doesn't erase the fact that the defender took out the other player. Can a ref explain this isn't called more? |
Not funny. I have actually seen strange calls for kids who are minorities of different kinds. Saw a ref who didn't call a single foul on kids who were clearly pushing and grabbing shirts but when a Chinese looking kid crashed into another kid and to me it looked like just that -a crash- the ref didn't even give a warning. It was a yellow card. |
You seem really defensive. It started with U12 and lasted years. My son is 20 now. It was 8 years - 3 years ago. The lady had a raspy voice I think it was NCSl. If sending a video of you being abusive to a player to complain makes me unreasonable then you should not be a ref. |
| ^^^ that’s such a weird response. Nobody accused you of being the referees that were reported. |
|
Somewhat of a soccer neophyte here.
How do refs interpret contact with the keeper? I get that a 50/50 ball is just that, and fair game (and a goalie presumably has a responsibility to protect him/herself). Too often, though, particularly at the younger ages, there is no doubt that GK will get to the ball first, yet the attacking player will come in full bore on the chance that the GK misplays it (as taught by the coach to "follow up"), and when the keeper goes to play it cleanly (either by hand or foot), he/she gets taken out. FWIW, I come from the hockey culture where the rules recognize that GK is almost always in a vulnerable position and the rules are designed to protect the keeper. I'm curious whether soccer refs follow the same thinking. |