Republicans storm SCIF in violation of the rules

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Every single day, the nutty Democrats go into a tizzy about something or the other. All it does is to cause moderates and independents to just ignore them.

Gaslighting troll.

If you don't agree with a poster, call him a troll or a bot or a Russian agent, a racist or indulging in gaslighting.

Ridiculous

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They should lose their clearances, at least. And that's going to make dong their jobs pretty difficult.

I believe, and have also read today, that members don’t have clearances.

No, but their staffers do. Or did...

Did the members make staffers go in?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When you are outraged about everything, legitimate issues on which one should be outraged about gets overlooked or is assumed to be more of the same.

Yesterday the outrage was about Trump using the term lynching with regard to impeachment and then it turned out that several Democrats used the same term to describe the Clinton impeachment including Biden!

Such a lot of phony outrage!

Phony like our constitution.

Like I said, a constant state of outrage causes legitimate outrage to be dismissed.

Remember the boy who cried wolf .........

Again I ask you. Is this a legitimate outrage being obfuscated by excessive outrage or is this part of the outrage cloud of nonsense you are trying to denounce?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They should lose their clearances, at least. And that's going to make dong their jobs pretty difficult.

I believe, and have also read today, that members don’t have clearances.

No, but their staffers do. Or did...

Did the members make staffers go in?

Supposedly, since the members *weren't tweeting from inside the SCIF*, their tweets were somehow sent by staffers. Did they text them to their staffers? Did the staffers come in? Did the staffers consent to allowing their names be used in this fiction?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Every single day, the nutty Democrats go into a tizzy about something or the other. All it does is to cause moderates and independents to just ignore them.

Gaslighting troll.

If you don't agree with a poster, call him a troll or a bot or a Russian agent, a racist or indulging in gaslighting.

Ridiculous

It's more generous than assuming they are serious.

[Anonymous]

All the Republicans are doing is showing how utterly terrified they are by the impeachment investigation.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Where are their tiki torches?

Yes that is seriously what I thought too. They look like “that” type of MAGAt group

[Anonymous]

In response to this, it may be time for Schiff and Pelosi to just go ahead and have these depositions public and televised. Show the country all of Trump's crimes.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Every single day, the nutty Democrats go into a tizzy about something or the other. All it does is to cause moderates and independents to just ignore them.

Gaslighting troll.

If you don't agree with a poster, call him a troll or a bot or a Russian agent, a racist or indulging in gaslighting.

Ridiculous

Keep gaslighting. It is too profane to call you what you really are, so I'll just call you a troll.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:In response to this, it may be time for Schiff and Pelosi to just go ahead and have these depositions public and televised. Show the country all of Trump's crimes.

And reward what the GOP just did?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When you are outraged about everything, legitimate issues on which one should be outraged about gets overlooked or is assumed to be more of the same.

Yesterday the outrage was about Trump using the term lynching with regard to impeachment and then it turned out that several Democrats used the same term to describe the Clinton impeachment including Biden!

Such a lot of phony outrage!

Phony like our constitution.

Like I said, a constant state of outrage causes legitimate outrage to be dismissed.

Remember the boy who cried wolf .........

Again I ask you. Is this a legitimate outrage being obfuscated by excessive outrage or is this part of the outrage cloud of nonsense you are trying to denounce?

Of course, there are things that warrant outrage. I think Trump's putting the Kurds at risk is just terrible and inexcusable. But like I said Democrats go into a fit of outrage over anything and everything that Trump and the Republicans do. The net effect is that one gets desensitized to it.

BTW, i am not a Trump supporter. i did not vote for him but I know quite a few who have - some reluctantly - and trust me when I say they just ignore most of this faux outrage.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:In response to this, it may be time for Schiff and Pelosi to just go ahead and have these depositions public and televised. Show the country all of Trump's crimes.

You guys don’t get it. They will eventually do that. But not during the investigation phase.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:In response to this, it may be time for Schiff and Pelosi to just go ahead and have these depositions public and televised. Show the country all of Trump's crimes.

And reward what the GOP just did?

Reward them? Do you think having the transcripts of Taylor's testimony rewards the GOP? It proves that Trump abused his office and should be impeached and removed.

Some will still say all sorts of ridiculous nonsense but some will be unable to avoid the truth.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When you are outraged about everything, legitimate issues on which one should be outraged about gets overlooked or is assumed to be more of the same.

Yesterday the outrage was about Trump using the term lynching with regard to impeachment and then it turned out that several Democrats used the same term to describe the Clinton impeachment including Biden!

Such a lot of phony outrage!

Phony like our constitution.

Like I said, a constant state of outrage causes legitimate outrage to be dismissed.

Remember the boy who cried wolf .........

Again I ask you. Is this a legitimate outrage being obfuscated by excessive outrage or is this part of the outrage cloud of nonsense you are trying to denounce?

Of course, there are things that warrant outrage. I think Trump's putting the Kurds at risk is just terrible and inexcusable. But like I said Democrats go into a fit of outrage over anything and everything that Trump and the Republicans do. The net effect is that one gets desensitized to it.

BTW, i am not a Trump supporter. i did not vote for him but I know quite a few who have - some reluctantly - and trust me when I say they just ignore most of this faux outrage.

Why is this question so hard for you? Is tweeting from inside the SCIF outrage worthy or not?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m in Ohio. How do I find out if my congressman is part of this?

Who’s your congressman? First step in the process of elimination would be to see if he’s on the Intelligence, Foreign Affairs or Oversight Committees. If he is, then he’s participating in the hearings and therefore not part of this stunt.

David Joyce. I don’t believe he sits on any of those committees. I have always considered him somewhat reasonable, and would be very disappointed if he participated in this.