Yes, this was off-campus but I’m really not comfortable saying where yet. |
|
|
So nice to see support offered on this forum. It seems more common on other DCUM forums.
People who reach out to strangers on the internet are often doubting themselves and looking for a safe, quick place to get help. I wish this forum could be made safer (and less judgemental) for parents who are, for the most part, doing the best they can. |
|
Three areas it can be an issue (but likely won't):
Intel Security Clearance Law School Bar Admission Overseas work or travel visas For those reasons, a consultation with a lawyer is probably in order to see if there is a way to get it expunged (at least for the visa purposes). I agree with the security clearance advice just don't lie about it, but for visas getting it expunged or dropped might be enough. I also agree wtih the understanding comments and showing him support, but would note should he do this again (or god forbid a thrid time) then the authorities who are going to look at this later in life are going to move it from the category of 'youthful screwup' to 'possible pattern of behavior'. |
| Can anyone explain the difference between having the charges dismissed vs having them expunged? I’m not clear about which is the more favorable option. |
+100 |
dismissed is far more favorable |
no expungement means they remove all records of the case |
| Dismissed that there is conviction related to the charge, but the charge is still on one’s record. Expungment means that the charge was dismissed and removed from one’s record. Dismissal has to happen in one of a few specific ways in order for a charge to be expungable. |
|
He’ll be fine for future employment as long as he doesn’t lie. And as long as he doesn’t make this a pattern.
I was arrested for the same thing in college and So were several of my friends. Absolutely NONE of us told our parents the whole truth and nothing but the truth. So sure, believe your child’s story but verify with the police report. Consider your son is not being completely forthright. |
dismissed... not charged, arrest is on his record. expunged... not charged, arrest is NOT on his record. |
|
It's a way for the local police to increase revenue at the expense of parents. Small town police are the worst. |
|
And the kids? the schools? No fault anywhere else?
It is illegal for kids to drink before they are 21. Those laws are thoroughly evaluated, and have saved thousands of lives. You can make it all sound as harmless as you want. But the police are enforcing a law that matters. Remember when that boy was let go with a warning by police a few years back, and he died walking home (drowned, I believe in a small stream...or died from hypothermia). They were crucified for not doing more. The point is, it is not safe to walk around by yourself when you are drunk. If you have taught your kids that such laws came about to line the pockets of small town cops, you have done them a disservice. |
But it will still turn up on a government investigation, correct? And don’t you still have to admit you were arrested on forms like the SF-86? |