|
I would say no. I agree with after college and on her own dime. I say that as someone who spent the summer after high school traveling through South East Asia with a friend. The ownership and responsibility you get from paying for it yourself with money you have earned through sweat and hours at a job shapes how you will spend it.
For me, I took traveling seriously as it was a ton of money at that age. I was thoughtful and responsible and make good choices. A teen in Europe with no financial ties, no responsibilities, and eight friends is a recipe for disaster. I also just don't think a 17 year old needs a free summer in Europe unless social status and keeping up with the rich is your main focus in life and you need to be able to throw around your Europe trips. |
| Another No and by the way, most of those other kids parents will also be a no so don’t worry about it. |
Glad to see someone saying this. It's true. Look up "street harassment" by country name, OP. Some legislators in Europe are trying to combat the cultural idea that street harassment is harmless but it's an uphill battle right now. YES, there is street harassment in the US, but PP probably can testify that it's much more open, aggressive and intimidating in some other countries. PP is right about how drinking would really flag a tourist teenager for worse than harassment. PPs will keep coming back to say the daughter should learn to deal, etc., but I'd take this PP's real life experience over "let her go because she's about to start college" posts. |
| Not a chance. |
| I’d let her go. Kids today are way over sheltered. |
|
I say yes, but without the fake ID part.
My daughter traveled in Europe with a friend after graduating HS. She had an amazing and fun experience and firmly believes that that independent experience really prepared her for being away at college. |
Yes and the only cure for that is a pricey unchaperoned European trip.
How about a job for little pookie? |
|
The girls I knew who got to do this in the 90s were rich girl promiscuous sluts who had "cool moms."
Unchaperoned Europe is for after college begins and/or once they'd had some real independence. The "what's the big deal, college begins in two months" crowd can shove it. College is a controlled environment with police, residential staff, deans and peers who were filtered by admissions department. |
|
OP Here. The question sorted itself out without us having to make a difficult decision. DD's BFF decided she wasn't going (or her parents said no) and DD didn't want to go without her. I suggested that she could invite some friends and spend a week or so at our vacation house in Park City. Much more controlled environment where we've got lots of friends and support should they need it.
As to the fake, I misunderstood her intentions. I assumed that the fake was for the Euro trip since both came up around the same time. The real reason is that she's feeling a little insecure about being 17 for the first half of her freshman year. |
So you're afraid your daughter will spread her legs in Europe, but the police and residential staff will somehow keep that from happening in college. |
I was 17 for the first half of my freshman year. It didn't make any difference that I ever noticed. |
PP, the fact that the DD thought having a fake ID would make her feel better about being 17 and a senior translates like this: DD has friends who as seniors will be old enough to buy alcohol. OP, that's your red flag. DD expects her friends will be drinking senior year and she doesn't want to be left out. In your shoes I'd be thinking about why her friends are interested enough in drinking that my DD was concerned she would feel odd or left out if she too couldn't get into bars or buy alcohol. And I'd be ensuring that senior year was so busy that she didn't have time for those particular friends. Where do you think she got the fake ID idea? Those friends. |
So you are a hard no because they will have to rely on mass transportation, may not be able to get on the same trains sometimes, and might argue during the trip? Seriously? |
|
The hard no was not just because of transit. I also think the whole setup was asking for trouble with groups splintering off and for other reasons. Sorry it came out as seeming that transport alone was the reason. The post was mostly addressing ONE aspect of this trip, in response to another post that also raised the travel issues for such a group. But the proposed trip had problems on several levels including but not limited to naïveté about details of travel as the first PP was noting. It's moot now as the DD isn't going.... |