Protests about Princess Eugenie's Wedding

Anonymous
The Yorks never change. Stuff like this is why taxpayers are on their asses now.

U.K. taxpayers paid 400,000 pounds for Eugenie’s 18th birthday party too.

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:The Yorks never change. Stuff like this is why taxpayers are on their asses now.

U.K. taxpayers paid 400,000 pounds for Eugenie’s 18th birthday party too.



this picture is hilarious. i would totally watch that movie.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The Yorks never change. Stuff like this is why taxpayers are on their asses now.

U.K. taxpayers paid 400,000 pounds for Eugenie’s 18th birthday party too.



this picture is hilarious. i would totally watch that movie.


Totally looks caricature. Are they for serious?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The Yorks never change. Stuff like this is why taxpayers are on their asses now.

U.K. taxpayers paid 400,000 pounds for Eugenie’s 18th birthday party too.



this picture is hilarious. i would totally watch that movie.


Totally looks caricature. Are they for serious?


Oh, it’s real. Taste and discretion have never been a York strong suit.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/cbbcnews/hi/newsid_5250000/newsid_5255700/5255798.stm
Anonymous
Charles, separately from his wife I might add, attends and conducts more 500 working events a year in addition to raising more than ten million a year for U.K. charities.

He's a tool as far romance goes but no one disputes his contributions to society or royal public perception. https://www.royal.uk/the-prince-of-wales


Who cares? What else must he do with his time?

They don't WORK. They exist in a bubble of wealth.

Why should I be impressed by some gross-looking man born into money with shit loads of time on his hands?

I much more admire people who work AND donate their time to charity. much more admirable

You people are such fools to idolize the rich!
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The Yorks never change. Stuff like this is why taxpayers are on their asses now.

U.K. taxpayers paid 400,000 pounds for Eugenie’s 18th birthday party too.



this picture is hilarious. i would totally watch that movie.


Totally looks caricature. Are they for serious?


Oh, it’s real. Taste and discretion have never been a York strong suit.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/cbbcnews/hi/newsid_5250000/newsid_5255700/5255798.stm


Is this one of those boardwalk photos? Bet mine was a lot cheaper...
Anonymous
The carriage ride and over the top wedding are strategic.

Charles has said he intends to scale back the monarchy in terms of who remains on the payroll. The Queen wouldn't do it, but he will.

Andrew and Fergie are doing whatever they can to demonstrate that their daughters have a following and their continued participation will add value. That's a stretch IMHO, but this wedding is a strategic attempt to demonstrate that Brits and the rest of the world value Eugenie and her sister.

They need the carriage ride to generate an audience. I'm sure she will have a designer gown plus an outfit change for the party. I'm sure pictures will be leaked. I'm sure honeymoon pics will be leaked. It's all to generate media attention to see just how popular she is.

If she's smart, she will ramp up her royal engagements and charity work. And she'll get pregnant sooner rather than later.

Once the queen is gone and Charles takes over, he absolutely can take his siblings and their kids off the payroll. He's basically said he would do that.

Andrew worked hard to get his daughters residences in Kensington palace. No clue if Charles can kick them out or not.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:The carriage ride and over the top wedding are strategic.

Charles has said he intends to scale back the monarchy in terms of who remains on the payroll. The Queen wouldn't do it, but he will.

Andrew and Fergie are doing whatever they can to demonstrate that their daughters have a following and their continued participation will add value. That's a stretch IMHO, but this wedding is a strategic attempt to demonstrate that Brits and the rest of the world value Eugenie and her sister.

They need the carriage ride to generate an audience. I'm sure she will have a designer gown plus an outfit change for the party. I'm sure pictures will be leaked. I'm sure honeymoon pics will be leaked. It's all to generate media attention to see just how popular she is.

If she's smart, she will ramp up her royal engagements and charity work. And she'll get pregnant sooner rather than later.

Once the queen is gone and Charles takes over, he absolutely can take his siblings and their kids off the payroll. He's basically said he would do that.

Andrew worked hard to get his daughters residences in Kensington palace. No clue if Charles can kick them out or not.


But only Eugenie is...now...living at Kensington Palace and in a 3-bedroom cottage which is most likely her permanent lot considering Andrew had to work hard just to get her that. One kid will be a stretch for it and her 'Princess' lifestyle. Add even just one more and she will be forced out with her new husband.

So I can't see this really working out long-term for their schemes. As for the wedding I think the Yorks have heavily overestimated Eugenie's potential popularity. I don't think they'll be laughed out of the church but pretty sure crowds are going to be thin.
Anonymous
At least Eugenie and Beatrix work. You see them making countless appearances on behalf of the Family. They value their roles and responsibilities, and work to meet their obligations
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:At least Eugenie and Beatrix work. You see them making countless appearances on behalf of the Family. They value their roles and responsibilities, and work to meet their obligations


...can't argue with that. Although its just as clear that the majority of the royal family doesn't value them. They come across as kicked puppies hanging on for dear life.

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:The Yorks never change. Stuff like this is why taxpayers are on their asses now.

U.K. taxpayers paid 400,000 pounds for Eugenie’s 18th birthday party too.



They dressed as Disney princesses for her 18th birthday?!?

Fergie as ballroom gown Belle, sister one as peasant Belle and birthday girl as Cinderella?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The carriage ride and over the top wedding are strategic.

Charles has said he intends to scale back the monarchy in terms of who remains on the payroll. The Queen wouldn't do it, but he will.

Andrew and Fergie are doing whatever they can to demonstrate that their daughters have a following and their continued participation will add value. That's a stretch IMHO, but this wedding is a strategic attempt to demonstrate that Brits and the rest of the world value Eugenie and her sister.

They need the carriage ride to generate an audience. I'm sure she will have a designer gown plus an outfit change for the party. I'm sure pictures will be leaked. I'm sure honeymoon pics will be leaked. It's all to generate media attention to see just how popular she is.

If she's smart, she will ramp up her royal engagements and charity work. And she'll get pregnant sooner rather than later.

Once the queen is gone and Charles takes over, he absolutely can take his siblings and their kids off the payroll. He's basically said he would do that.

Andrew worked hard to get his daughters residences in Kensington palace. No clue if Charles can kick them out or not.


But only Eugenie is...now...living at Kensington Palace and in a 3-bedroom cottage which is most likely her permanent lot considering Andrew had to work hard just to get her that. One kid will be a stretch for it and her 'Princess' lifestyle. Add even just one more and she will be forced out with her new husband.

So I can't see this really working out long-term for their schemes. As for the wedding I think the Yorks have heavily overestimated Eugenie's potential popularity. I don't think they'll be laughed out of the church but pretty sure crowds are going to be thin.


Now how did I know this would happen?

Why Britain Is Snubbing the 'Other' Royal Wedding

The public is recoiling from Princess Eugenie’s lavish wedding not because she is unpopular but because many people only vaguely know who she is and she has no official role.

https://www.thedailybeast.com/why-britain-is-snubbing-the-other-royal-wedding?ref=home



Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The Yorks never change. Stuff like this is why taxpayers are on their asses now.

U.K. taxpayers paid 400,000 pounds for Eugenie’s 18th birthday party too.



this picture is hilarious. i would totally watch that movie.


Totally looks caricature. Are they for serious?


It was a Victorian-themed masked ball, people! And it was Beatrice’s birthday party.
Anonymous
Eugenie planned a 25th birthday party that was disney themed. She went as Snow White and hired dwarfs to act as the 7 dwarfs. The over the top wedding was completely expected and I am not surprised the British dint want to pay for it.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3139607/Dancing-dwarfs-bisexual-supermodel-Fergie-s-Wizard-Oz-outfit-Welcome-Princess-Eugenie-s-11-hour-b-day-bash.html
Anonymous
Please. At least they are available and receptive. Not like Kate
post reply Forum Index » Entertainment and Pop Culture
Message Quick Reply
Go to: