Would you send a gay child to a Catholic school?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If a child is identifying as homosexual, it is most likely that child has been sexually abused or molested. Children are not into sexuality like that, they have to be pushed or goaded into it by an older person.

Red Flag.

PP is the true "red flag" and another reason to not send you gay kid to Catholic school

And so where does a child learn about this sexuality stuff, if not from an older person? Children only become sexualized by people around them steering them that way, influencing them.

I repeat the truth: if a child is talking about transgender nonsense or homosexuality, THAT CHILD has been sexually molested or abused or is being influenced in a negative way. You must closely supervise that
child and remove that child from such influences because it does not come from within (gays are not born that way) it comes from without.

PP is sadly misinformed -- possibly by religious influences.

Do heterosexual children "learn" to be heterosexual and otherwise wouldn't know what gender they identified with? Of course not.

What about trans-gender children -- no one encourages them to be trans-gender, they just know, at some point, sometimes very early on, that they are not on the inside what they look like on the outside.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If a child is identifying as homosexual, it is most likely that child has been sexually abused or molested. Children are not into sexuality like that, they have to be pushed or goaded into it by an older person.

Red Flag.

PP is the true "red flag" and another reason to not send you gay kid to Catholic school

And so where does a child learn about this sexuality stuff, if not from an older person? Children only become sexualized by people around them steering them that way, influencing them.

I repeat the truth: if a child is talking about transgender nonsense or homosexuality, THAT CHILD has been sexually molested or abused or is being influenced in a negative way. You must closely supervise that
child and remove that child from such influences because it does not come from within (gays are not born that way) it comes from without.

PP is sadly misinformed -- possibly by religious influences.

Do heterosexual children "learn" to be heterosexual and otherwise wouldn't know what gender they identified with? Of course not.

What about trans-gender children -- no one encourages them to be trans-gender, they just know, at some point, sometimes very early on, that they are not on the inside what they look like on the outside.

Children do not think of themselves as "heterosexual" or "homosexual". They do not define themselves in that way. They know only that "boys and girls are different." Their minds and bodies have not developed enough to get deep into sexuality topics. As they get closer to puberty then they become aware of their bodies and sexual urges.

There are no transgender children, only adults who put them up to such nonsense and mess with their heads, or the child is mentally ill. A transgender person is a mentally ill person who needs help. My theory concerning them is this:

"A transgender person is a homosexual who tries to escape the condemnation of his conscience which is telling him what he is doing is sin, so to escape that sin that person, mind addled and confused, figures that by becoming a member of the opposite sex it is no longer homosexuality and therefore not a sin anymore."

This is how the debased human mind operates to justify sin.

The male is designed by God to mate with a female. The female is designed by God to mate with a male. This is the natural order God has created. If you are a male thinking you are female you are mentally confused and need help. That male can think of themselves as female all they want but it will NEVER change the fact that person is male. A person can think of themselves as a dog, get on the floor and bark and get surgery to look like a dog, but that person will never be a dog, will always be a human.

So no, I am not misinformed. Although the garbage psychology textbooks declare homosexuality a normal thing, God's word says otherwise.

[Anonymous]

The fashionable encouragement today of transgenderism in children is a grave error and sin.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If a child is identifying as homosexual, it is most likely that child has been sexually abused or molested. Children are not into sexuality like that, they have to be pushed or goaded into it by an older person.

Red Flag.

PP is the true "red flag" and another reason to not send you gay kid to Catholic school

And so where does a child learn about this sexuality stuff, if not from an older person? Children only become sexualized by people around them steering them that way, influencing them.

I repeat the truth: if a child is talking about transgender nonsense or homosexuality, THAT CHILD has been sexually molested or abused or is being influenced in a negative way. You must closely supervise that
child and remove that child from such influences because it does not come from within (gays are not born that way) it comes from without.

PP is sadly misinformed -- possibly by religious influences.

Do heterosexual children "learn" to be heterosexual and otherwise wouldn't know what gender they identified with? Of course not.

What about trans-gender children -- no one encourages them to be trans-gender, they just know, at some point, sometimes very early on, that they are not on the inside what they look like on the outside.

Children do not think of themselves as "heterosexual" or "homosexual". They do not define themselves in that way. They know only that "boys and girls are different." Their minds and bodies have not developed enough to get deep into sexuality topics. As they get closer to puberty then they become aware of their bodies and sexual urges.

There are no transgender children, only adults who put them up to such nonsense and mess with their heads, or the child is mentally ill. A transgender person is a mentally ill person who needs help. My theory concerning them is this:

"A transgender person is a homosexual who tries to escape the condemnation of his conscience which is telling him what he is doing is sin, so to escape that sin that person, mind addled and confused, figures that by becoming a member of the opposite sex it is no longer homosexuality and therefore not a sin anymore."

This is how the debased human mind operates to justify sin.

The male is designed by God to mate with a female. The female is designed by God to mate with a male. This is the natural order God has created. If you are a male thinking you are female you are mentally confused and need help. That male can think of themselves as female all they want but it will NEVER change the fact that person is male. A person can think of themselves as a dog, get on the floor and bark and get surgery to look like a dog, but that person will never be a dog, will always be a human.

So no, I am not misinformed. Although the garbage psychology textbooks declare homosexuality a normal thing, God's word says otherwise.

PP is sick

[Anonymous]

Maybe transgenderism and homosexuality is proof that Christianity is wrong?

[Anonymous]

Why are people here trying to promote homosexuality/transfreakism in a religion forum? There is no place for approval of that sinful behavior here, nor in a church.

If I were to go to the LBTi-have-no-idea-what-i-am forum trying to promote Christianity, there would be an uproar, I would be accused of hate-speech (because I do not approve, neither does God, of homosexuality) and all manner of squealing and screaming of "Leave us alone!"

Despite the media trumpeting polls that "Now more than ever, Americans approve of homosexuality!" it is not true. The majority of people DETEST homosexuality and transgenderism and want want no part of it. No parent wants their child to grow up and be part of that, no more than they want them to become schizophrenic or develop anorexia. Even in liberal California the people there voted against gay marriage, the courts had to force people to "accept" it.

And before you go there: homosexual rights are not the same as civil rights that blacks fought for: you cannot choose your race, but you can choose to be homosexual, and you can choose not to be homosexual. There are many homosexuals who come to Jesus and turn away from homosexuality.

This is all a transgender person is: a homosexual transvestite, usually a person whose mind is altered by heavy use of drugs and alcohol.

Finally, children (who for some strange reason get front page attention on the news --wonder why?) are either being pushed by an evil adult to be transgender, or the child is seeking attention.

And people wonder so much why Trump got elected. This is one of the reasons: the media trying to force acceptance of transgender garbage. What you are seeing is a cultural backlash.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No.

I went to Catholic school.

I send my non-Catholic kid to Catholic school for the academics (which have been great).

I have another DD who is a lesbian and no she will never attend a Catholic school.

Your not concerned about the non-homosexual kid learning negative things that apply to lesbian DD?

I began sending younger child when she was ten years old. She's already familiar with my world view, which is pragmatic and accepting of gays, accepting of sex, accepting of birth control, etc. IN short, liberal. She's capable of making her own decisions about what she hears from Catholic school. And having gone to Catholic school myself (K- 12) , I'm very familiar with the dogma and able to ask her thought-provoking questions about what she hears and what she thinks. And it's not like they are spending much time in 5th grade talking about homosexuality. The topic has not been raised at the school in the time she's been there.

I remember being in religion class at my nun-run Catholic HS, where priests did the theology classes. I'd argue incessantly with the priests, and they'd argue back, but my challenges were always tolerated. In part, being so educated on the Bible and religion gave me the confidence to reject the way the Church interprets Christ's teachings and made me a liberal. I feel that the current Pope, despite whatever flaws he may have, has come closer to articulating genuine Christianity than I've heard from the Church before. See recent statement on the death penalty. I may be pro-choice personally but I admire the Pope's consistency on the value of ALL lives, not just fetuses.

If my kid grows up to be a Catholic in the true sense, I'm fine with whatever path she chooses, as long as she is a good person and happy. Same with my older gay daughter - fine with whoever she turns out to be, too.

Meanwhile the education has been excellent and I'm glad to spend the $8k per year or so, although we are not wealthy. It's been worth it. My kid is doing things that the public school appears to have given up on.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Why are people here trying to promote homosexuality/transfreakism in a religion forum? There is no place for approval of that sinful behavior here, nor in a church.

If I were to go to the LBTi-have-no-idea-what-i-am forum trying to promote Christianity, there would be an uproar, I would be accused of hate-speech (because I do not approve, neither does God, of homosexuality) and all manner of squealing and screaming of "Leave us alone!"

Despite the media trumpeting polls that "Now more than ever, Americans approve of homosexuality!" it is not true. The majority of people DETEST homosexuality and transgenderism and want want no part of it. No parent wants their child to grow up and be part of that, no more than they want them to become schizophrenic or develop anorexia. Even in liberal California the people there voted against gay marriage, the courts had to force people to "accept" it.

And before you go there: homosexual rights are not the same as civil rights that blacks fought for: you cannot choose your race, but you can choose to be homosexual, and you can choose not to be homosexual. There are many homosexuals who come to Jesus and turn away from homosexuality.

This is all a transgender person is: a homosexual transvestite, usually a person whose mind is altered by heavy use of drugs and alcohol.

Finally, children (who for some strange reason get front page attention on the news --wonder why?) are either being pushed by an evil adult to be transgender, or the child is seeking attention.

And people wonder so much why Trump got elected. This is one of the reasons: the media trying to force acceptance of transgender garbage. What you are seeing is a cultural backlash.

People are discussing, not promoting. Pp doesn't seem to know the difference, or that there are Christians who are homosexual or transgender who find congregations that welcome them.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No.

I went to Catholic school.

I send my non-Catholic kid to Catholic school for the academics (which have been great).

I have another DD who is a lesbian and no she will never attend a Catholic school.

Your not concerned about the non-homosexual kid learning negative things that apply to lesbian DD?

I began sending younger child when she was ten years old. She's already familiar with my world view, which is pragmatic and accepting of gays, accepting of sex, accepting of birth control, etc. IN short, liberal. She's capable of making her own decisions about what she hears from Catholic school. And having gone to Catholic school myself (K- 12) , I'm very familiar with the dogma and able to ask her thought-provoking questions about what she hears and what she thinks. And it's not like they are spending much time in 5th grade talking about homosexuality. The topic has not been raised at the school in the time she's been there.

I remember being in religion class at my nun-run Catholic HS, where priests did the theology classes. I'd argue incessantly with the priests, and they'd argue back, but my challenges were always tolerated. In part, being so educated on the Bible and religion gave me the confidence to reject the way the Church interprets Christ's teachings and made me a liberal. I feel that the current Pope, despite whatever flaws he may have, has come closer to articulating genuine Christianity than I've heard from the Church before. See recent statement on the death penalty. I may be pro-choice personally but I admire the Pope's consistency on the value of ALL lives, not just fetuses.

If my kid grows up to be a Catholic in the true sense, I'm fine with whatever path she chooses, as long as she is a good person and happy. Same with my older gay daughter - fine with whoever she turns out to be, too.

Meanwhile the education has been excellent and I'm glad to spend the $8k per year or so, although we are not wealthy. It's been worth it. My kid is doing things that the public school appears to have given up on.

I remember being in religion class at my nun-run Catholic HS, where priests did the theology classes. I'd argue incessantly with the priests,

And this is why the apostle Paul wrote in 1 Corinthians 14 "As in all the churches of the saints, the women should keep silence in the churches. For they are not permitted to speak, but should be subordinate, as even the law says. If there is anything they desire to know, let them ask their husbands at home. "

This is the kind of woman who soon finds herself divorced, arguing and bickering against authority, refusing to shut her mouth and listen. Few men can long put up with such a contentious woman who demands everyone change their thinking to agree with her.

When a woman like this pp gets a little education, she thinks she knows it all, says to herself, "Why, the church for 2,000 must be wrong in its teachings concerning homosexuality and morality.In fact, the whole bible must be wrong because I know better."

Arguing with priests? Really. The true Christians will never back down nor accept the liberal point of view but will stand on scripture as the final authority, not some argumentative woman.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No.

I went to Catholic school.

I send my non-Catholic kid to Catholic school for the academics (which have been great).

I have another DD who is a lesbian and no she will never attend a Catholic school.

Your not concerned about the non-homosexual kid learning negative things that apply to lesbian DD?

I began sending younger child when she was ten years old. She's already familiar with my world view, which is pragmatic and accepting of gays, accepting of sex, accepting of birth control, etc. IN short, liberal. She's capable of making her own decisions about what she hears from Catholic school. And having gone to Catholic school myself (K- 12) , I'm very familiar with the dogma and able to ask her thought-provoking questions about what she hears and what she thinks. And it's not like they are spending much time in 5th grade talking about homosexuality. The topic has not been raised at the school in the time she's been there.

I remember being in religion class at my nun-run Catholic HS, where priests did the theology classes. I'd argue incessantly with the priests, and they'd argue back, but my challenges were always tolerated. In part, being so educated on the Bible and religion gave me the confidence to reject the way the Church interprets Christ's teachings and made me a liberal. I feel that the current Pope, despite whatever flaws he may have, has come closer to articulating genuine Christianity than I've heard from the Church before. See recent statement on the death penalty. I may be pro-choice personally but I admire the Pope's consistency on the value of ALL lives, not just fetuses.

If my kid grows up to be a Catholic in the true sense, I'm fine with whatever path she chooses, as long as she is a good person and happy. Same with my older gay daughter - fine with whoever she turns out to be, too.

Meanwhile the education has been excellent and I'm glad to spend the $8k per year or so, although we are not wealthy. It's been worth it. My kid is doing things that the public school appears to have given up on.

I remember being in religion class at my nun-run Catholic HS, where priests did the theology classes. I'd argue incessantly with the priests,

And this is why the apostle Paul wrote in 1 Corinthians 14 "As in all the churches of the saints, the women should keep silence in the churches. For they are not permitted to speak, but should be subordinate, as even the law says. If there is anything they desire to know, let them ask their husbands at home. "

This is the kind of woman who soon finds herself divorced, arguing and bickering against authority, refusing to shut her mouth and listen. Few men can long put up with such a contentious woman who demands everyone change their thinking to agree with her.

When a woman like this pp gets a little education, she thinks she knows it all, says to herself, "Why, the church for 2,000 must be wrong in its teachings concerning homosexuality and morality.In fact, the whole bible must be wrong because I know better."

Arguing with priests? Really. The true Christians will never back down nor accept the liberal point of view but will stand on scripture as the final authority, not some argumentative woman.

LOL case in point. How to make someone into a liberal and a feminist 101.

I bet you hate this "infallible" Pope, don't you?

PP maybe you should pray for me and my gay child instead of being mean to me on the internet?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No.

I went to Catholic school.

I send my non-Catholic kid to Catholic school for the academics (which have been great).

I have another DD who is a lesbian and no she will never attend a Catholic school.

Your not concerned about the non-homosexual kid learning negative things that apply to lesbian DD?

I began sending younger child when she was ten years old. She's already familiar with my world view, which is pragmatic and accepting of gays, accepting of sex, accepting of birth control, etc. IN short, liberal. She's capable of making her own decisions about what she hears from Catholic school. And having gone to Catholic school myself (K- 12) , I'm very familiar with the dogma and able to ask her thought-provoking questions about what she hears and what she thinks. And it's not like they are spending much time in 5th grade talking about homosexuality. The topic has not been raised at the school in the time she's been there.

I remember being in religion class at my nun-run Catholic HS, where priests did the theology classes. I'd argue incessantly with the priests, and they'd argue back, but my challenges were always tolerated. In part, being so educated on the Bible and religion gave me the confidence to reject the way the Church interprets Christ's teachings and made me a liberal. I feel that the current Pope, despite whatever flaws he may have, has come closer to articulating genuine Christianity than I've heard from the Church before. See recent statement on the death penalty. I may be pro-choice personally but I admire the Pope's consistency on the value of ALL lives, not just fetuses.

If my kid grows up to be a Catholic in the true sense, I'm fine with whatever path she chooses, as long as she is a good person and happy. Same with my older gay daughter - fine with whoever she turns out to be, too.

Meanwhile the education has been excellent and I'm glad to spend the $8k per year or so, although we are not wealthy. It's been worth it. My kid is doing things that the public school appears to have given up on.

I remember being in religion class at my nun-run Catholic HS, where priests did the theology classes. I'd argue incessantly with the priests,

And this is why the apostle Paul wrote in 1 Corinthians 14 "As in all the churches of the saints, the women should keep silence in the churches. For they are not permitted to speak, but should be subordinate, as even the law says. If there is anything they desire to know, let them ask their husbands at home. "

This is the kind of woman who soon finds herself divorced, arguing and bickering against authority, refusing to shut her mouth and listen. Few men can long put up with such a contentious woman who demands everyone change their thinking to agree with her.

When a woman like this pp gets a little education, she thinks she knows it all, says to herself, "Why, the church for 2,000 must be wrong in its teachings concerning homosexuality and morality.In fact, the whole bible must be wrong because I know better."

Arguing with priests? Really. The true Christians will never back down nor accept the liberal point of view but will stand on scripture as the final authority, not some argumentative woman.

LOL case in point. How to make someone into a liberal and a feminist 101.

I bet you hate this "infallible" Pope, don't you?

PP maybe you should pray for me and my gay child instead of being mean to me on the internet?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No.

I went to Catholic school.

I send my non-Catholic kid to Catholic school for the academics (which have been great).

I have another DD who is a lesbian and no she will never attend a Catholic school.

Your not concerned about the non-homosexual kid learning negative things that apply to lesbian DD?

I began sending younger child when she was ten years old. She's already familiar with my world view, which is pragmatic and accepting of gays, accepting of sex, accepting of birth control, etc. IN short, liberal. She's capable of making her own decisions about what she hears from Catholic school. And having gone to Catholic school myself (K- 12) , I'm very familiar with the dogma and able to ask her thought-provoking questions about what she hears and what she thinks. And it's not like they are spending much time in 5th grade talking about homosexuality. The topic has not been raised at the school in the time she's been there.

I remember being in religion class at my nun-run Catholic HS, where priests did the theology classes. I'd argue incessantly with the priests, and they'd argue back, but my challenges were always tolerated. In part, being so educated on the Bible and religion gave me the confidence to reject the way the Church interprets Christ's teachings and made me a liberal. I feel that the current Pope, despite whatever flaws he may have, has come closer to articulating genuine Christianity than I've heard from the Church before. See recent statement on the death penalty. I may be pro-choice personally but I admire the Pope's consistency on the value of ALL lives, not just fetuses.

If my kid grows up to be a Catholic in the true sense, I'm fine with whatever path she chooses, as long as she is a good person and happy. Same with my older gay daughter - fine with whoever she turns out to be, too.

Meanwhile the education has been excellent and I'm glad to spend the $8k per year or so, although we are not wealthy. It's been worth it. My kid is doing things that the public school appears to have given up on.

I remember being in religion class at my nun-run Catholic HS, where priests did the theology classes. I'd argue incessantly with the priests,

And this is why the apostle Paul wrote in 1 Corinthians 14 "As in all the churches of the saints, the women should keep silence in the churches. For they are not permitted to speak, but should be subordinate, as even the law says. If there is anything they desire to know, let them ask their husbands at home. "

This is the kind of woman who soon finds herself divorced, arguing and bickering against authority, refusing to shut her mouth and listen. Few men can long put up with such a contentious woman who demands everyone change their thinking to agree with her.

When a woman like this pp gets a little education, she thinks she knows it all, says to herself, "Why, the church for 2,000 must be wrong in its teachings concerning homosexuality and morality.In fact, the whole bible must be wrong because I know better."

Arguing with priests? Really. The true Christians will never back down nor accept the liberal point of view but will stand on scripture as the final authority, not some argumentative woman.

Run along, PP. Grown-ups are talking.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No.

I went to Catholic school.

I send my non-Catholic kid to Catholic school for the academics (which have been great).

I have another DD who is a lesbian and no she will never attend a Catholic school.

Your not concerned about the non-homosexual kid learning negative things that apply to lesbian DD?

I began sending younger child when she was ten years old. She's already familiar with my world view, which is pragmatic and accepting of gays, accepting of sex, accepting of birth control, etc. IN short, liberal. She's capable of making her own decisions about what she hears from Catholic school. And having gone to Catholic school myself (K- 12) , I'm very familiar with the dogma and able to ask her thought-provoking questions about what she hears and what she thinks. And it's not like they are spending much time in 5th grade talking about homosexuality. The topic has not been raised at the school in the time she's been there.

I remember being in religion class at my nun-run Catholic HS, where priests did the theology classes. I'd argue incessantly with the priests, and they'd argue back, but my challenges were always tolerated. In part, being so educated on the Bible and religion gave me the confidence to reject the way the Church interprets Christ's teachings and made me a liberal. I feel that the current Pope, despite whatever flaws he may have, has come closer to articulating genuine Christianity than I've heard from the Church before. See recent statement on the death penalty. I may be pro-choice personally but I admire the Pope's consistency on the value of ALL lives, not just fetuses.

If my kid grows up to be a Catholic in the true sense, I'm fine with whatever path she chooses, as long as she is a good person and happy. Same with my older gay daughter - fine with whoever she turns out to be, too.

Meanwhile the education has been excellent and I'm glad to spend the $8k per year or so, although we are not wealthy. It's been worth it. My kid is doing things that the public school appears to have given up on.

I remember being in religion class at my nun-run Catholic HS, where priests did the theology classes. I'd argue incessantly with the priests,

And this is why the apostle Paul wrote in 1 Corinthians 14 "As in all the churches of the saints, the women should keep silence in the churches. For they are not permitted to speak, but should be subordinate, as even the law says. If there is anything they desire to know, let them ask their husbands at home. "

This is the kind of woman who soon finds herself divorced, arguing and bickering against authority, refusing to shut her mouth and listen. Few men can long put up with such a contentious woman who demands everyone change their thinking to agree with her.

When a woman like this pp gets a little education, she thinks she knows it all, says to herself, "Why, the church for 2,000 must be wrong in its teachings concerning homosexuality and morality.In fact, the whole bible must be wrong because I know better."

Arguing with priests? Really. The true Christians will never back down nor accept the liberal point of view but will stand on scripture as the final authority, not some argumentative woman.

Says pp speaking from the 19th century

[Anonymous]

Folks, OP is a troll and has no intention of sending his/her kid to Catholic school, if s/he even has a kid (OP has not talked about a specific kid).

OP wants to bash Catholics (no, I’m not Catholic myself) and this thread is the gift that keeps on giving.

Don’t feed the troll.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No.

I went to Catholic school.

I send my non-Catholic kid to Catholic school for the academics (which have been great).

I have another DD who is a lesbian and no she will never attend a Catholic school.

Your not concerned about the non-homosexual kid learning negative things that apply to lesbian DD?

I began sending younger child when she was ten years old. She's already familiar with my world view, which is pragmatic and accepting of gays, accepting of sex, accepting of birth control, etc. IN short, liberal. She's capable of making her own decisions about what she hears from Catholic school. And having gone to Catholic school myself (K- 12) , I'm very familiar with the dogma and able to ask her thought-provoking questions about what she hears and what she thinks. And it's not like they are spending much time in 5th grade talking about homosexuality. The topic has not been raised at the school in the time she's been there.

I remember being in religion class at my nun-run Catholic HS, where priests did the theology classes. I'd argue incessantly with the priests, and they'd argue back, but my challenges were always tolerated. In part, being so educated on the Bible and religion gave me the confidence to reject the way the Church interprets Christ's teachings and made me a liberal. I feel that the current Pope, despite whatever flaws he may have, has come closer to articulating genuine Christianity than I've heard from the Church before. See recent statement on the death penalty. I may be pro-choice personally but I admire the Pope's consistency on the value of ALL lives, not just fetuses.

If my kid grows up to be a Catholic in the true sense, I'm fine with whatever path she chooses, as long as she is a good person and happy. Same with my older gay daughter - fine with whoever she turns out to be, too.

Meanwhile the education has been excellent and I'm glad to spend the $8k per year or so, although we are not wealthy. It's been worth it. My kid is doing things that the public school appears to have given up on.

I remember being in religion class at my nun-run Catholic HS, where priests did the theology classes. I'd argue incessantly with the priests,

And this is why the apostle Paul wrote in 1 Corinthians 14 "As in all the churches of the saints, the women should keep silence in the churches. For they are not permitted to speak, but should be subordinate, as even the law says. If there is anything they desire to know, let them ask their husbands at home. "

This is the kind of woman who soon finds herself divorced, arguing and bickering against authority, refusing to shut her mouth and listen. Few men can long put up with such a contentious woman who demands everyone change their thinking to agree with her.

When a woman like this pp gets a little education, she thinks she knows it all, says to herself, "Why, the church for 2,000 must be wrong in its teachings concerning homosexuality and morality.In fact, the whole bible must be wrong because I know better."

Arguing with priests? Really. The true Christians will never back down nor accept the liberal point of view but will stand on scripture as the final authority, not some argumentative woman.

Bwaaaahaaaahaaahaaa! That’s my husband laughing at you. I’m argumentative as they come and we’re Catholic and we are happily married.


Wow, what a troll!