I don't have to think you imbecile. I know. You on the other hand don't know the difference because your IQ is less than 80. Probably why Chicago rejected ou. Your lack of intellectual gravitas must have come across in your essays. Run along now |
| Because UChicago isn't that good |
| How many are going to Chicago from area schools? |
| STA always sends 5-6 boys |
| My daughter's boyfriend got rejected from Cornell but accepted by Chicago. He claims he only worked hard on the Chicago app, but doesn't everyone say that? |
| No, actually. The UChicago uncommon app pulls out of applicants the critical thinking traits the school is looking for. It's very different than the generic questions asked by most schools. |
|
I know someone who didn’t complete the Chicago app (started it online but never filed) and was accepted with aid. This was five years ago.
Anyway, nice to see our old friends UChicago Hater, Crazy CalTech Booster, and Inarticulate Right Wing-Nut. The PP who said all these schools have similar student bodies and impressive profs (with the difference that some departments will be stronger than others) is right. Including UChicago. Signed, my kid went to a USNWR top 5 and I know plenty of kids at the other top schools |
More like 8 in recent years. |
| It seems like UChicago has an identity crisis - or its supporters do? It wants to be considered at the level of an Ivy but does not have that reputation. Stanford and Duke and a few other schools seems to have the same "prestige" as an Ivy and no identity crisis - but Chicago struggles. Why? |
|
Would Duke and Chicago be considered equal caliber schools in most people's opinion?
|
No. |
which is better? |
UChicago’s identity crisis is reflection of the US’s ambivalence about what makes an elite university elite — is it that it attracts/produces the smartest people or the richest people? Ivies (and some of the older LACs), historically and to somewhat varying degrees, were in the social elite camp. UChicago (and places like JHU and MIT) have, historically, been in the intellectual elite camp. UChicago is facing a moment (as Stanford did in the 1980s, for somewhat different but also somewhat related reasons) where it’s better able to compete for the social elite. Stanford never defined itself against that model, but UChicago did. Hence the identity crisis. UChicago will get over it, but how and where the balance gets struck is currently up for grabs and some people (on opposite sides) feel very strongly that these are high-stakes decisions. |