| I had one C-section. 4 VBACs. I weigh exactly the same at 50 that I did at 16. I'm 5'5 and 115 pounds. I easily lost weight after every pregnancy. BUT, my body certainly changed. My hips are bigger. My boobs got bigger and stayed bigger. I have stretch marks on my stomach and on breasts. Within the last couple of years, everything seems to be slowly migrating south. ? I'm active and fit, but time marches on. The only thing that would fix things is surgery, and there is no way I'm doing that. |
Yep, and sorry but vaginas get looser after pregnancy and with age no matter the mode of delivery. Not right away, necessarily, but aging affects us all... |
No one said "every" vaginal delivery causes massive trauma and damage. But in general delivery injuries during vaginal births causes these issues vs just carrying a baby and then having a CS. I mean, do you not see the difference in meaning in those two sentences? |
Can you read? |
What the hell is your problem? Take a Midol and chill. |
|
Eh, c-sections cause injuries of their own, that are pretty common - scar tissue, mostly, leading to pelvic pain and often hysterectomy. Which can cause prolapse. Maybe just sucks to be a woman sometimes? |
Agreed that it sucks to be a woman in this regard. Definitely not a competition in suffering. I'm pretty biased though, since my third, very large baby and his massive head changed my life forever and I wish I had had a CS with him. The amount of stretching involved in birthing what is basically a large cantaloupe wasn't something I did without permanent and lasting injuries. |
This is completely wrong. Massive numbers of women who had only c-sections have pelvic floor weakness and incontinence. Pregnancy is very hard on the pelvic floor. Same with hemorrhoids. And if you think a vaginal delivery can leave a vagina "stretched out," you are stupid beyond words. Any "looseness" is the result of MUSCULAR weakness, which occurs often after any mode of delivery. Same with peeing when you sneeze. The only time a vaginal delivery causes more damage than a c-section in these areas is when there is an a traumatic delivery with a very long pushing stage, instrumental delivery, etc. |
PP have already posted citations that show YOU are wrong when it comes to "which is worse," which is not to say that CS's prevent incontinence, only which is more likely to lead to incontinence and prolapse. And by the way, your use of "the only time vaginal delivery is worse than CS" just shows how much of an ignorant blow hard you are. Because while statistics are just that - sometimes x happens, sometimes y happens, but over a large number of data sets this is the big picture pattern, NO study shows that sort of definitive statement you just pulled out of your butt. |
Ignorant blowhard? LOL, okay. Yes, statistics show that vaginal delivery is "more likely" to result in those outcomes because delivering vaginally is the only way to have a traumatic, and/or instrumental vaginal delivery. In cases of extended pushing, etc., a c-section should be performed to reduce risk of damage. Look, I've had c-sections myself and it sucks. I have pelvic floor damage from pregnancy. Bearing children is hard.
|
This is why most men keep a broodmare at home and seek real satisfaction on the side. |
|
I have this. You don't want it. Vaginal delivery http://sydney.edu.au/medicine/nepean/research/obstetrics/pelvic-floor-assessment/Pelvic_Floor_Assessment/Levator_trauma.html
|
| Bottom line - the pelvic floor is poorly understood in our society and among our medical professionals. If you have any symptoms of pelvic floor weakness, much can be done via PT. But some things, like levator avulsion can't be fixed, and lead to a cascade of problems over the long haul. |
+1, terrible injuries can occur in both vaginal and c-section births. I hope in the future we can better understand the risk factors and find advances in prevention and repair. |