I completely understand the need to ensure due process and protection of all citizens, even that idiot Trump. I realize these things take time. However, in the meantime, Trump and his minions are making significant inroads in judicial appointments that will negatively affect the lives of my children, long after I am gone.
So I just have to ask again why this is taking so long? I am a not a lawyer, so please don't flame me. Moreover, if Trump/Pence and others are potentially removed from office at some point, do these judicial appointments still stand? If the election of this administration was achieved through treasonous acts, will the actions of this administration be allowed to stand? These are serious questions I have. I honestly want to know what is taking so long and what recourse do Americans have if our president has committed treason? |
You must be young. This investigation is going at lightspeed rate compared to other special counsel investigations. |
PP here. I am not young by any standard but thank you for clarifying that because I am not clear on what is standard. From where I sit, this is taking forever but I am the first to say that I really have no frame of reference beyond my own concern and impatience. |
His judicial appointments can be impeached, I believe. And should be. |
By comparison, the special counsel investigation of the Clintons and Whitewater took 4 1/2 years. |
Based on???? |
Bigotry. https://splinternews.com/were-gonna-be-stuck-with-trumpism-for-a-loooong-time-1822330733 |
Watergate and the 9/11 Commission also took much longer than this. I’m pretty sure that even the Valerie Plame investigation was longer. |
Other PPs addressed that this investigation is moving along @ a fairly rapid clip. There is no recourse other than vote, get others to vote, volunteer for campaigns, donate money to candidates. We did not have to be in this spot. |
If it is proven that Donald J Trump was elected through treachery with Russia and with the complicity of the GOP, there is no argument in defense of keeping his tainted appointments on the bench. AKA actual patriotism. |
Big “if” there. I think you will be disappointed. |
Lol. Yes, it’s totally traditional, for a tip of the iceberg example, for a candidate to invite a hostile foreign power to hack someone's email. That’s definitely the sign of someone not at all interested in illegal, nefarious activity. |
Since that did not happen, your point is irrelevant. |
![]() https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=gNa2B5zHfbQ |
https://amp.smh.com.au/world/robert-mueller-wants-to-question-donald-trump-on-his-firing-decisions-20180124-p4yyt9.html?__twitter_impression=true At the time, Sessions was a top foreign policy adviser to candidate Trump. Kislyak's accounts of the conversations were intercepted by US spy agencies, which regularly monitor the communications of senior Russian officials in the United States and Russia. One US official said Sessions has provided "misleading" statements that are "contradicted by other evidence." A former official said the intelligence indicates that Sessions and Kislyak had "substantive" discussions on matters including Trump's positions on Russia-related issues and prospects for U.S.-Russia relations in a Trump administration. |