Mueller to Question Trump

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Don the Con is going to start getting really cranky soon. If Mueller has him on obstruction, he’s in deep doo doo.

I predict the GOP redoubles it’s efforts to smear law enforcement officers over the next few weeks. They have to prepare their base for the ticking time bomb that is the Mueller investigation. The only play is to sew enough doubt that the House refuses to impeach.

I wonder if Mueller holds the Russian conspiracy case until after the election. That way he gets a shot a second shot with a new jury.

Republicans should unite with BLM to smear LE.

Nice try but the Repugs have fallen all over themselves trying to besmirch LE since they've been sniffing around their Toddler in Chief.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I wish this were PPV. Heck, it could pay for the goddamned wall.

I would pay ten bucks for that. Oh my god. No, scratch that, I would pay $50.

I'll raise you $50.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I wish this were PPV. Heck, it could pay for the goddamned wall.

Haha. True. Trump is going to be all over the place.

Figured this was going to drop today as we found out that Mueller has already interviewed Sessions. It seems like maybe Mueller is wrapping up the obstruction part of this case, but the bigger Russian conspiracy case is still out there.

Assuming Meuller finds that Trump has obstructed justice (before concluding the remainder of the investigation), would he go forward with charges of obstruction directly thereafter - or would he wait until the entire investigation is done? In other words, can and would Meuller go forward with charges piecemeal?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I wish this were PPV. Heck, it could pay for the goddamned wall.

Haha. True. Trump is going to be all over the place.

Figured this was going to drop today as we found out that Mueller has already interviewed Sessions. It seems like maybe Mueller is wrapping up the obstruction part of this case, but the bigger Russian conspiracy case is still out there.

Assuming Meuller finds that Trump has obstructed justice (before concluding the remainder of the investigation), would he go forward with charges of obstruction directly thereafter - or would he wait until the entire investigation is done? In other words, can and would Meuller go forward with charges piecemeal?

I’ve been thinking about this. I think it depends on how strong the obstruction case is.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I wish this were PPV. Heck, it could pay for the goddamned wall.

Haha. True. Trump is going to be all over the place.

Figured this was going to drop today as we found out that Mueller has already interviewed Sessions. It seems like maybe Mueller is wrapping up the obstruction part of this case, but the bigger Russian conspiracy case is still out there.

Assuming Meuller finds that Trump has obstructed justice (before concluding the remainder of the investigation), would he go forward with charges of obstruction directly thereafter - or would he wait until the entire investigation is done? In other words, can and would Meuller go forward with charges piecemeal?

I’ve been thinking about this. I think it depends on how strong the obstruction case is.

I can't imagine how it wouldn't be airtight. Trump is on tape (Holt interview) volunteering that he fired Comey to impede the investigation. Apparently, Trump is now pressuring Sessions to pressure Wray to fire FBI agents he doesn't consider sympathetic to him. How much more do they need?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I wish this were PPV. Heck, it could pay for the goddamned wall.

Haha. True. Trump is going to be all over the place.

Figured this was going to drop today as we found out that Mueller has already interviewed Sessions. It seems like maybe Mueller is wrapping up the obstruction part of this case, but the bigger Russian conspiracy case is still out there.

Assuming Meuller finds that Trump has obstructed justice (before concluding the remainder of the investigation), would he go forward with charges of obstruction directly thereafter - or would he wait until the entire investigation is done? In other words, can and would Meuller go forward with charges piecemeal?

I’ve been thinking about this. I think it depends on how strong the obstruction case is.

I can't imagine how it wouldn't be airtight. Trump is on tape (Holt interview) volunteering that he fired Comey to impede the investigation. Apparently, Trump is now pressuring Sessions to pressure Wray to fire FBI agents he doesn't consider sympathetic to him. How much more do they need?

It’s a tough jury that’s seated.

[Anonymous]

Trump should decline. ANY president can hire and fire at will with no explanation needed.

That's the way it works (has worked, does work and will work) and new precedents should not be set because dems want to play gotcha.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Trump should decline. ANY president can hire and fire at will with no explanation needed.

That's the way it works (has worked, does work and will work) and new precedents should not be set because dems want to play gotcha.

Hahaha. I’m sure Mueller feels the same way. One difference: Mueller actually understands the law. BTW Mueller is a Republican and most of the FBI are VERY conservative.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Trump should decline. ANY president can hire and fire at will with no explanation needed.

That's the way it works (has worked, does work and will work) and new precedents should not be set because dems want to play gotcha.

Hahaha. I’m sure Mueller feels the same way. One difference: Mueller actually understands the law. BTW Mueller is a Republican and most of the FBI are VERY conservative.

No, I understand the law. ANY president can hire and fire at will with no explanation needed, period, end of sentence, end of argument, bitch.

[Anonymous]

Oh, end of argument BITCH - now I am convinced. Mueller should just quit then!

[Anonymous]

Oh Lordy, please let there be tapes.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Trump should decline. ANY president can hire and fire at will with no explanation needed.

That's the way it works (has worked, does work and will work) and new precedents should not be set because dems want to play gotcha.

Hahaha. I’m sure Mueller feels the same way. One difference: Mueller actually understands the law. BTW Mueller is a Republican and most of the FBI are VERY conservative.

No, I understand the law. ANY president can hire and fire at will with no explanation needed, period, end of sentence, end of argument, bitch.

No, you don’t. President’s can fire for no reason, but not for an improper reason. -Lawyer

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Trump should decline. ANY president can hire and fire at will with no explanation needed.

That's the way it works (has worked, does work and will work) and new precedents should not be set because dems want to play gotcha.

+1

Harvard law professor Dershowitz clearly explained on several occasions the president can’t obstruct justice.

What happened to the Russia counter intelligence investigation that spawned the Mueller probe? It is increasingly apparent Mueller is the fruit of a poisonous tree. He needs to wrap it up before further embarrassing himself.

[Anonymous]

Douchewitz lol.... trumpy is fucked.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Trump should decline. ANY president can hire and fire at will with no explanation needed.

That's the way it works (has worked, does work and will work) and new precedents should not be set because dems want to play gotcha.

Hahaha. I’m sure Mueller feels the same way. One difference: Mueller actually understands the law. BTW Mueller is a Republican and most of the FBI are VERY conservative.

No, I understand the law. ANY president can hire and fire at will with no explanation needed, period, end of sentence, end of argument, bitch.

No, you don’t. President’s can fire for no reason, but not for an improper reason. -Lawyer

There was a proper reason.