Twitter employees admit that they use screening to filter/bury conservative posts

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I wonder if Jeff could put a price on doing this. How much do we need to pay him to filter out all of the truly terrible conservative posts.

You just want this forum to be a circle-jerk, Hugh?

It'd be nice to cut down on the drama and blatant racism.

Tbh, the only racist posts I see on here are from liberals.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I wonder if Jeff could put a price on doing this. How much do we need to pay him to filter out all of the truly terrible conservative posts.

You just want this forum to be a circle-jerk, Hugh?

It'd be nice to cut down on the drama and blatant racism.

Tbh, the only racist posts I see on here are from liberals.

The worst ones are definitely from the liberals. The despicable things they say about poor whites would be deleted - and the posters banned - if they were said about poor blacks.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I wonder if Jeff could put a price on doing this. How much do we need to pay him to filter out all of the truly terrible conservative posts.

You just want this forum to be a circle-jerk, Hugh?

It'd be nice to cut down on the drama and blatant racism.

Tbh, the only racist posts I see on here are from liberals.

The worst ones are definitely from the liberals. The despicable things they say about poor whites would be deleted - and the posters banned - if they were said about poor blacks.

Exactly.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:
Time to regulate Twitter along with the other tech giants to protect democracy?

https://www.projectveritas.com/2018/01/11/undercover-video-twitter-engineers-to-ban-a-way-of-talking-through-shadow-banning-algorithms-to-censor-opposing-political-opinions/

Steven Pierre, Twitter engineer explains “shadow banning,” says “it’s going to ban a way of talking”

Former Twitter software engineer Abhinav Vadrevu on shadow banning: “they just think that no one is engaging with their content, when in reality, no one is seeing it”

Former Twitter Content Review Agent Mo Norai explains banning process: “if it was a pro-Trump thing and I’m anti-Trump… I banned his whole account… it’s at your discretion”

When asked if banning process was an unwritten rule, Norai adds “Very. A lot of unwritten rules… It was never written it was more said”

Olinda Hassan, Policy Manager for Twitter Trust and Safety explains, “we’re trying to ‘down rank’… shitty people to not show up,” “we’re working [that] on right now”

“Shadow banning” to be used to stealthily target political views- former Twitter engineer says, “that’s a thing”

Censorship of certain political viewpoints to be automated via “machine learning” according to Twitter software engineer

Parnay Singh, Twitter Direct Messaging Engineer, on machine learning algorithms, “you have like five thousand keywords to describe a redneck…” “the majority of it are for Republicans”

Shameful.

[Anonymous]

Create your own platform and have your own rules. Not shameful.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Create your own platform and have your own rules. Not shameful.

Shadow banning is done because you want to hide your activities from the public.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I wonder if Jeff could put a price on doing this. How much do we need to pay him to filter out all of the truly terrible conservative posts.

You just want this forum to be a circle-jerk, Hugh?

It'd be nice to cut down on the drama and blatant racism.

Tbh, the only racist posts I see on here are from liberals.

STFU, delusional turd.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I wonder if Jeff could put a price on doing this. How much do we need to pay him to filter out all of the truly terrible conservative posts.

You just want this forum to be a circle-jerk, Hugh?

It'd be nice to cut down on the drama and blatant racism.

Tbh, the only racist posts I see on here are from liberals.

STFU, delusional turd.

Nice job proving PP correct. LOL!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I wonder if Jeff could put a price on doing this. How much do we need to pay him to filter out all of the truly terrible conservative posts.

You just want this forum to be a circle-jerk, Hugh?

It'd be nice to cut down on the drama and blatant racism.

Tbh, the only racist posts I see on here are from liberals.

STFU, delusional turd.

Nice job proving PP correct. LOL!

DP. "Turd" is racist? Y'all are not very bright, eh? But then you like Project Veritas, so it makes sense.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I wonder if Jeff could put a price on doing this. How much do we need to pay him to filter out all of the truly terrible conservative posts.

You just want this forum to be a circle-jerk, Hugh?

It'd be nice to cut down on the drama and blatant racism.

Tbh, the only racist posts I see on here are from liberals.

STFU, delusional turd.

Nice job proving PP correct. LOL!

DP. "Turd" is racist? Y'all are not very bright, eh? But then you like Project Veritas, so it makes sense.

The PP was discussing the 'racist' issue as a broader point, i.e. liberals being dramatic as well. But it IS just like a liberal to cherry-pick to avoid the broader truth.

[Anonymous]

This seems relevant here. Twitter is actually going to reveal who the Russian trolls are, to the people who followed and retweeted them.

“Twitter will inform nearly 700,000 people in the U.S. that they either followed a Kremlin-linked troll account, or retweeted or liked a tweet sent by one of the accounts, the social media company said Friday.”
http://money.cnn.com/2018/01/19/media/twitter-internet-research-agency-accounts/index.html

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Oh wait, this is Project Veritas. Never mind, same old stupid.

You just stop reading at “project veritas,” huh? Refuse to even see what Twitter is on film saying? My my.

Yes! All sane people would! They edit tapes to make them lie! You’re just a sad little person.

How the F can they edit what the employee says, you idiot leftarded sycophant?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Oh wait, this is Project Veritas. Never mind, same old stupid.

You just stop reading at “project veritas,” huh? Refuse to even see what Twitter is on film saying? My my.

Yes! All sane people would! They edit tapes to make them lie! You’re just a sad little person.

How the F can they edit what the employee says, you idiot leftarded sycophant?

My my, such anger.

"According to Steve Bannon, Donald Trump is a Nazi"

Can be edited to

" Steve Bannon is a Nazi"

Easy peasy!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Jeff does delete conservative posts. All the time.

.... and posts by people who are trolling.... did your "conservative" posts check one of the above?

I'd estimate that probably 1/3 - 1/2 of all my posts are deleted, and they have absolutely nothing that could be construed racist, sexist, bigoted, homophobic or otherwise offensive in anyway way EXCEPT for being contrary to the liberal groupthink here. FACT is, merely BEING a conservative here on this forum is considered "trolling".

Jeff doesn't want this to be an arena where all ideals are represented equally and fairly. He wants a liberal echo chamber. And he works his butt off all day to keep it that way.

Whatever. His site, his rules.

But I think he does the liberals here a disservice in doing so, because it reinforces their bubble, and makes it seem as if people who oppose their ideas are few and far between, when in reality, it is actually a majority of the country.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Oh wait, this is Project Veritas. Never mind, same old stupid.

You just stop reading at “project veritas,” huh? Refuse to even see what Twitter is on film saying? My my.

Yes! All sane people would! They edit tapes to make them lie! You’re just a sad little person.

How the F can they edit what the employee says, you idiot leftarded sycophant?

Please, cut back on the 'roids before you hurt yourself, and others.