DCPS AP and SAT score data from 2016-17 released

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:But I thought the reason Wilson's PAARC scores were poor was because those children and staff were concentrating ever so hard on the AP. Now I'm confused. I mean, surely that wasn't just a convenient excuse...

BINGO, smoke & mirrors, illusions!!!! DCPS hopes you don't remember that their PR went into overdrive went into overdrive last time when PARCC scores came out, wonder what their excuse will be this time?

Wilson's scores aren't too different from a similar MOCO school

Yes, but the W's and Poolesville are significantly better (~80% scoring 3 or above). But the old adage seems to hold true -- white kids do well enough even in Wilson.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:But I thought the reason Wilson's PAARC scores were poor was because those children and staff were concentrating ever so hard on the AP. Now I'm confused. I mean, surely that wasn't just a convenient excuse...

BINGO, smoke & mirrors, illusions!!!! DCPS hopes you don't remember that their PR went into overdrive went into overdrive last time when PARCC scores came out, wonder what their excuse will be this time?

Wilson's scores aren't too different from a similar MOCO school

Yes, but the W's and Poolesville are significantly better (~80% scoring 3 or above). But the old adage seems to hold true -- white kids do well enough even in Wilson.

I don't think the W's/Poolesville have the same population; more UMC kids with college-educated parents out there

[Anonymous]

Poolesville is a test-in magnet school.