Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:We have to get them out. Lander is a good place to start. He seems very nice, but he isn't interested in being very honest about our predicament. He has also said some really silly things regarding poverty and Farms students.
Maura is a nice combination of kindness and sensibility.
What I was saying about the whites who want to get rid of the poors coming out to support Maura (b/c opposition to Lander).
Lander is the one who insisted that race and SES don't matter because all APS schools are good, then voted for Option 4. So I wouldn't count him as an ally in the fight for social justice and quality public education for all.
He also made the very valid point that busing kids would be very harmful for lower income families, members of which (i.e. parents) may not be easily able to get across town for school events (back to school night, music concerts, sporting events).
You have to be very careful that the call for diversity and "social justice" not be something privileged white people demand. Minority communities like their neighborhood schools just fine too.
The experience in DC, with black OOB families trying very hard to get their kids into Wilson, suggests otherwise.
Murphy has perpetuated the current inequalities within APS but his downfall is that he's disappointed the privileged within APS as well.
I don't think DC schools are comparable to Arlington, so I don't think your Wilson analogy really applies. Plus, there's Metro in DC. You cannot take Metro from Four Mile Run to Yorktown.
Goodness! We can't have kids from FOUR MILE RUN polluting Yorktown!
Jesus Christ, you wench. This is in the context of the difficulty of PARENTS who live in the Four Mile Run area getting to Yorktown in a busing scenario.
Different wench here. The students from Four Mile Run are already bused to W-L. The families in this area largely prefer this to attending Wakefield. It's not as simple as which school is closer and wanting to be able to walk to school or to events. Everyone, regardless of background, wants their children to be in a school where they feel their student will receive the best possible education, and where they feel they will be safe and welcome. I am not intimately familiar with the culture of Yorktown, but
it is widely rumored to be hostile toward minority students, particularly if they are low-income. Again, I suspect this is more rumor than truth, but that is what these families believe. They feel like W-L is a better school than Wakefield, but Wakefield is a safer school than Yorktown for their children (so they would pick W-L first, and if they had to choose between Wakefield and Yorktown, they would likely choose Wakefield out of fear). Also, during the boundary process I heard an awful lot of middle class white women talking about what the Four Mile Run community wants (to walk to school). I did NOT hear members of that community saying the same things. So unless there was some secret meeting in which this sentiment was expressly communicated, we're all just speculating. The people who seemed to be pushing this idea of Four Mile run families wanting to walk were the mothers living in other W-L planning units that were on the chopping block. I'm not saying walkability isn't a factor to consider. It's just not the only factor.
In short, it's not so simple. My take is that many parents would prioritize attending a "better" school over a closer school, but not at the risk of their student's safety and/or well-being.