Looks like Hillary Clinton is setting the stage to run again in 2020

[Anonymous]

Conservatives can't let go of the Clintons. They have been your excuse for so long, you don't know how to function without them.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Conservatives can't let go of the Clintons. They have been your excuse for so long, you don't know how to function without them.

They only know how to run against her, not stand up and with their candidate when he tries to govern. He cannot get past campaigning either with the Tank You tour

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Conservatives can't let go of the Clintons. They have been your excuse for so long, you don't know how to function without them.

Nah, it's just fun to hate her. I know you get the joy that hating brings.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Trump is an egotistical fool, and perhaps has a mental illness.

Fixed that for you.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If Hillary's health permits, I believe that she will run again. It will be her last shot at trying to win the presidency given her age.

She does not stand to lose anything by running again. It assumes that she wins the nomination, of course.

You can't be serious.

Even her ego can't take the huge walloping she would get in 2020. And you thought 2016 was bad.

You really don't understand the Clintons. They are relentless. She is laying the groundwork for the loss not being her fault at all. It was Comey and the Russian hacking and racism by Trump. You notice she does not say one word about her server and trust issues, her flawed campaign in the Rust Belt, her lack of a message, etc.

In the gospel according to the Clintons, the election was stolen from her and she is entitled to another whack at it. It also helps that the Dems really don't have anyone obvious as a front runner. Biden, the obvious one, will be too old.

The only thing that would dissuade her from running is her health.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If Hillary's health permits, I believe that she will run again. It will be her last shot at trying to win the presidency given her age.

She does not stand to lose anything by running again. It assumes that she wins the nomination, of course.

You can't be serious.

Even her ego can't take the huge walloping she would get in 2020. And you thought 2016 was bad.

You really don't understand the Clintons. They are relentless. She is laying the groundwork for the loss not being her fault at all. It was Comey and the Russian hacking and racism by Trump. You notice she does not say one word about her server and trust issues, her flawed campaign in the Rust Belt, her lack of a message, etc.

In the gospel according to the Clintons, the election was stolen from her and she is entitled to another whack at it. It also helps that the Dems really don't have anyone obvious as a front runner. Biden, the obvious one, will be too old.

The only thing that would dissuade her from running is her health.

let it go. She is done.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:She already is starting to raise money for 2020. She will be at the march in January. She needs to keep the others out of the field.

Cite for this alleged money raising?

[Anonymous]

Fuck no. This 'planning' is what got us in this mess the first place. The PUMA's can fuck off and die.

[Anonymous]

She's a 2-time loser who losses were against a community activist who had been a senator for 15 minutes and a reality tv star. She's done. Thankfully.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

BTW, I did not vote for her ..... nor did I vote for Trump.

I see this all the time, from posters here and commenters on FB. They ALWAYS say it while trashing Hillary, though, and never deriding Trump. Hmmm.

I didn't vote for either. If fact, this election made me switch from D to Ind, and I've been voting since 1984.

Liberals in this country have gone off the deep end with entitlement and enabling. So you won't hear Trump bashing from people who were fed up.

Until the Dems get their act together, I'll be sticking with my Ind label and may vote R in 2020.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She already is starting to raise money for 2020. She will be at the march in January. She needs to keep the others out of the field.

Cite for this alleged money raising?

Pravda

[Anonymous]

Here is Hillary's script for explaining her loss - it is tongue in cheek but she would happily latch on to it since it takes responsibility for her loss away from her - which is her MO.

An excerpt:

The men from Moscow hacked into Clinton’s teleprompter last Sept. 9. In a fundraising speech that she delivered to donors at Cipriani restaurant, literally on Wall Street, her original reference to half of Trump’s supporters as “hard-working Americans thirsty for economic growth and tired of being lectured to by condescending, out-of-touch elites in Washington” disappeared. Instead, Clinton was amazed to find herself calling them a “basket of deplorables.” She was as stunned as anyone to find her lips forming the words “racist, sexist, homophobic, xenophobic, Islamophobic — you name it.”

http://www.unionleader.com/columns/Deroy-Murdock-How-the-Kremlin-killed-the-Clinton-campaign-12162016

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

BTW, I did not vote for her ..... nor did I vote for Trump.

I see this all the time, from posters here and commenters on FB. They ALWAYS say it while trashing Hillary, though, and never deriding Trump. Hmmm.

I didn't vote for either. If fact, this election made me switch from D to Ind, and I've been voting since 1984.

Liberals in this country have gone off the deep end with entitlement and enabling. So you won't hear Trump bashing from people who were fed up.

Until the Dems get their act together, I'll be sticking with my Ind label and may vote R in 2020.

+1. I went independent with Obama. I had a feeling the "change" was an empty promise. I also may start voting R because the Democrats don't speak to people like me anymore.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She already is starting to raise money for 2020. She will be at the march in January. She needs to keep the others out of the field.

Cite for this alleged money raising?

Her scheduled speaking appearances for one. You don't think she does that for free, do you??

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She already is starting to raise money for 2020. She will be at the march in January. She needs to keep the others out of the field.

Cite for this alleged money raising?

Her scheduled speaking appearances for one. You don't think she does that for free, do you??

Are you not aware of what the word "cite" means?