Holt an unfair moderator

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's tough for people like you to admit that DJT is crushing it lately - but that is the reality. The CNBC and Time polls (as well as Drudge) gave Trump a huge win. While not scientific, they show enthusiasm over HRC supporters. I think CNN deleted their poll when it showed Trump as the victor in the debate.

Several of the conservative blogs posted links to the online polls and exhorted their readers to vote, vote, vote. Pretty sure those polls are meaningless.

This is important. It demonstrates that Trump supporters are more enthusiastic. Hillary has a huge digital media response team and she can't get them motivated to click for the debate win.

Here's a discussion about how Tubby's supporters cheated to "win" those online polls. Hint:"Abuse 'Airplane Mode' toggling" to vote multiple times.
http://www.vanityfair.com/news/2016/09/trump-accidentally-insults-his-own-alt-right-meme-army

I guess Donald told us all last night that it's just smart to cheat ... on your taxes, in the bankruptcy courts, in business dealings, and now in polling.

Keep telling yourself this.

MAGA!

[Anonymous]

Holt has leapfrogged Candy Crowley as the best shill for the democrat in presidential debate history. The bar is set quite high for Anderson Cooper to match it. Expect dead horses named birther, David Duke and tax returns get another beat-down.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's tough for people like you to admit that DJT is crushing it lately - but that is the reality. The CNBC and Time polls (as well as Drudge) gave Trump a huge win. While not scientific, they show enthusiasm over HRC supporters. I think CNN deleted their poll when it showed Trump as the victor in the debate.

Several of the conservative blogs posted links to the online polls and exhorted their readers to vote, vote, vote. Pretty sure those polls are meaningless.

This is important. It demonstrates that Trump supporters are more enthusiastic. Hillary has a huge digital media response team and she can't get them motivated to click for the debate win.

Here's a discussion about how Tubby's supporters cheated to "win" those online polls. Hint:"Abuse 'Airplane Mode' toggling" to vote multiple times.
http://www.vanityfair.com/news/2016/09/trump-accidentally-insults-his-own-alt-right-meme-army

I guess Donald told us all last night that it's just smart to cheat ... on your taxes, in the bankruptcy courts, in business dealings, and now in polling.

When has Trump cheated on any of the things you listed? Maybe, and probably, on a wife or two - but not on the things you listed.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Holt has leapfrogged Candy Crowley as the best shill for the democrat in presidential debate history. The bar is set quite high for Anderson Cooper to match it. Expect dead horses named birther, David Duke and tax returns get another beat-down.

Since this is about all they have, you can guaranty Cooper will do his best. But Trump will not be stumped.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Holt has leapfrogged Candy Crowley as the best shill for the democrat in presidential debate history. The bar is set quite high for Anderson Cooper to match it. Expect dead horses named birther, David Duke and tax returns get another beat-down.

Since this is about all they have, you can guaranty Cooper will do his best. But Trump will not be stumped.

Hopefully he won't come across as a blustering , clueless boob again.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Holt has leapfrogged Candy Crowley as the best shill for the democrat in presidential debate history. The bar is set quite high for Anderson Cooper to match it. Expect dead horses named birther, David Duke and tax returns get another beat-down.

Since this is about all they have, you can guaranty Cooper will do his best. But Trump will not be stumped.

Hopefully he won't come across as a blustering , clueless boob again.

Zebras can't change their stripes. And blowhards can't stop being blowhards.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Holt has leapfrogged Candy Crowley as the best shill for the democrat in presidential debate history. The bar is set quite high for Anderson Cooper to match it. Expect dead horses named birther, David Duke and tax returns get another beat-down.

Since this is about all they have, you can guaranty Cooper will do his best. But Trump will not be stumped.

He's trying out for the biggest job on the planet and all y'all can talk about is how unfair he's being treated, like you're the parent of a middle schooler trying to pressure his teacher into upping a grade.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:He was the 3rd debater and clearly on HRC's side.

This. What a waste.

[Anonymous]

Jesus, people. It was a PRESIDENTIAL DEBATE. Not seeking feedback from a Toastmasters Club. If he and his team could not foresee what substantive questions would be asked, then he is even more inept than I thought.

As for unfairness, give me a break. He's been treated with kid gloves for the last several weeks, including the Matt Lauer interview, when HRC was crucified for every little thing (substantive or not). Holt wasn't unfair, except maybe to HRC, due to his inability to stop Trump's ramblings and interruptions.

You know what else? Life's not fair. Even if there was "unfairness" that's part of the deal: in work, in sports, in debates. And, frankly, you know you've lost if you have to resort to whiny bitching and nitpicking microphone issues. He lost. He looked like a fool unprepared to lead student council. Forget the presidency.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He was the 3rd debater and clearly on HRC's side.

This. What a waste.

Welcome the new constituency: Helicopter voters. Hovering. Making excuses. Whining "that's not fair!"

[Anonymous]

The President will not be given a week to rest before every important event.

She simply doesn't have the strength. Period.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Jesus, people. It was a PRESIDENTIAL DEBATE. Not seeking feedback from a Toastmasters Club. If he and his team could not foresee what substantive questions would be asked, then he is even more inept than I thought.

As for unfairness, give me a break. He's been treated with kid gloves for the last several weeks, including the Matt Lauer interview, when HRC was crucified for every little thing (substantive or not). Holt wasn't unfair, except maybe to HRC, due to his inability to stop Trump's ramblings and interruptions.

You know what else? Life's not fair. Even if there was "unfairness" that's part of the deal: in work, in sports, in debates. And, frankly, you know you've lost if you have to resort to whiny bitching and nitpicking microphone issues. He lost. He looked like a fool unprepared to lead student council. Forget the presidency.

Here's the problem with your statements. The mainstream media is supposed to be the neutral in the US, not a mouthpiece for either party. This is the US, not Russia, (despite Hillary wearing Communist red and not wearing an American flag pin, but I digress...).

The people of this country don't get the truth, when media edits the comments of one candidate in his/her favor and edits the comments of the other in a negative fashion.

The media's behavior has decided my vote. If mainstream feels they need to 'cover' for Hillary, she is clearly not worthy of the office.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The President will not be given a week to rest before every important event.

She simply doesn't have the strength. Period.

No, this is what serious presidential candidates do. Both Romney and Obama did the same thing in the last election.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The President will not be given a week to rest before every important event.

She simply doesn't have the strength. Period.

Ok, so apparently you know nothing about the last forty years of presidential debates. Period.

[Anonymous]

Not only did Reagan do a week of heavy preparation for his debate with Carter, his team stole Carter's debate briefing materials. It was called "DebateGate".