Busload of Lebanese Olympians refuse to let Israeli team on bus!

Anonymous
Sounds like some kind of misunderstanding about the bus assignments got blown way out of proportion.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Threads like this greatly help me to convert liberal Jews into conservative Jews. They have no idea re: the contempt and venom that liberals feel for them in general until they see it in writing.

Absolutely! I have read these comments and am totally incredulous with the antisemitism that is spewing from the mouths of liberals. (And I've read some pretty disgusting anti-Jewish posts on other threads, too.) And for all you antisemities who have posted above, there is essentially no difference between being anti-Israel and antisemitic.)

There is a direct correlation between anti-Israel sentiment and the rise of antisemitism both in Europe and the U.S. Look at the BDS movement - which calls for the boycott of Israeli products - spreading like wildfire through college campuses and the rise in antisemitism there, and how it is most horrible at the most liberal schools. (I'm looking st you, UC/Davis.) Yet, these same liberals, while spewing hatred of Jews, come up with ridiculous notions such as "Muslim Appreciation Day" (again, California).

And the irony of all this is that these liberal antisemities accuse conservatives of racism.



Disagreeing with Israel building settlements and oppressing the Palestinians is not anti-Semitic. That's how the conservatives spin it to prevent anyone from saying anything against human rights violations by Israel, because it you speak out against atrocities committed by Israel you are called anti-Semitic. Sorry, I'm not anti-Semitic, but I don't support Israel's continued oppression of the Palestinians.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:If the Israelis are so keen to share buses with others, perhaps they could also share land and natural resources as well and stop repressing the Palestinians. Until they do, it's very hard to get worked up about this.


+1


The Jew-hating Arabs were offered a two-state solution when Israel was formed in 1948, but they refused. They weren't interested in "sharing" because they did not - and still do not! - recognize Israel's right to exist. They have said repeatedly that they want every Jew wiped out of Israel. Israel needs land to protect itself from people sworn to its destruction.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Threads like this greatly help me to convert liberal Jews into conservative Jews. They have no idea re: the contempt and venom that liberals feel for them in general until they see it in writing.

Absolutely! I have read these comments and am totally incredulous with the antisemitism that is spewing from the mouths of liberals. (And I've read some pretty disgusting anti-Jewish posts on other threads, too.) And for all you antisemities who have posted above, there is essentially no difference between being anti-Israel and antisemitic.)

There is a direct correlation between anti-Israel sentiment and the rise of antisemitism both in Europe and the U.S. Look at the BDS movement - which calls for the boycott of Israeli products - spreading like wildfire through college campuses and the rise in antisemitism there, and how it is most horrible at the most liberal schools. (I'm looking st you, UC/Davis.) Yet, these same liberals, while spewing hatred of Jews, come up with ridiculous notions such as "Muslim Appreciation Day" (again, California).

And the irony of all this is that these liberal antisemities accuse conservatives of racism.



Disagreeing with Israel building settlements and oppressing the Palestinians is not anti-Semitic. That's how the conservatives spin it to prevent anyone from saying anything against human rights violations by Israel, because it you speak out against atrocities committed by Israel you are called anti-Semitic. Sorry, I'm not anti-Semitic, but I don't support Israel's continued oppression of the Palestinians.

The antisemtic U.N. voted Israel as the biggest violator of human rights in the world. Give me a break. The Arabs in Isrsael have it better there than they would in any Arab country. And yet, the liberals fall all over themselve defending these Arab countries. It's all rooted in antisemitism.
jsteele
Site Admin Online
Anonymous wrote:there is essentially no difference between being anti-Israel and antisemitic.


Wow. I guess someone has realized that it is impossible to defend Israel's actions so it is simply better to declare criticism of Israel to be out of bounds. Are you one of those people who complains about liberals being PC? Do you hate "safe places" on college campuses?

Would you say that criticism of Iran or Saudi Arabia is anti-Islamic?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Threads like this greatly help me to convert liberal Jews into conservative Jews. They have no idea re: the contempt and venom that liberals feel for them in general until they see it in writing.

Absolutely! I have read these comments and am totally incredulous with the antisemitism that is spewing from the mouths of liberals. (And I've read some pretty disgusting anti-Jewish posts on other threads, too.) And for all you antisemities who have posted above, there is essentially no difference between being anti-Israel and antisemitic.)

There is a direct correlation between anti-Israel sentiment and the rise of antisemitism both in Europe and the U.S. Look at the BDS movement - which calls for the boycott of Israeli products - spreading like wildfire through college campuses and the rise in antisemitism there, and how it is most horrible at the most liberal schools. (I'm looking st you, UC/Davis.) Yet, these same liberals, while spewing hatred of Jews, come up with ridiculous notions such as "Muslim Appreciation Day" (again, California).

And the irony of all this is that these liberal antisemities accuse conservatives of racism.



Disagreeing with Israel building settlements and oppressing the Palestinians is not anti-Semitic. That's how the conservatives spin it to prevent anyone from saying anything against human rights violations by Israel, because it you speak out against atrocities committed by Israel you are called anti-Semitic. Sorry, I'm not anti-Semitic, but I don't support Israel's continued oppression of the Palestinians.

The antisemtic U.N. voted Israel as the biggest violator of human rights in the world. Give me a break. The Arabs in Isrsael have it better there than they would in any Arab country. And yet, the liberals fall all over themselve defending these Arab countries. It's all rooted in antisemitism.

Give me a break. Plenty of Jewish people agree that the Israeli Government is guilty of Human Rights Violations ans International War Crimes.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:It might be ridiculous but then again, what do you know about being a country that was under Israeli siege for decades.

Um, this is the Olympics where you leave politics at home. If you can't deal, go home.

In history, Lebanese are not the only ones that have been occupied. There are many others at the Olympics. But thank goodness that they don't act this way. Childish.

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:It might be ridiculous but then again, what do you know about being a country that was under Israeli siege for decades.

Um, this is the Olympics where you leave politics at home. If you can't deal, go home.

In history, Lebanese are not the only ones that have been occupied. There are many others at the Olympics. But thank goodness that they don't act this way. Childish.


Thank you. I've been disgusted by how quickly the liberals on this board have turned some nasty behavior by the Lebanese into an indictment against Israel.
Anonymous
When it comes to seating on buses, history shows that it is better to be inclusive rather than exclusive.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Threads like this greatly help me to convert liberal Jews into conservative Jews. They have no idea re: the contempt and venom that liberals feel for them in general until they see it in writing.

Absolutely! I have read these comments and am totally incredulous with the antisemitism that is spewing from the mouths of liberals. (And I've read some pretty disgusting anti-Jewish posts on other threads, too.) And for all you antisemities who have posted above, there is essentially no difference between being anti-Israel and antisemitic.)

There is a direct correlation between anti-Israel sentiment and the rise of antisemitism both in Europe and the U.S. Look at the BDS movement - which calls for the boycott of Israeli products - spreading like wildfire through college campuses and the rise in antisemitism there, and how it is most horrible at the most liberal schools. (I'm looking st you, UC/Davis.) Yet, these same liberals, while spewing hatred of Jews, come up with ridiculous notions such as "Muslim Appreciation Day" (again, California).

And the irony of all this is that these liberal antisemities accuse conservatives of racism.



Disagreeing with Israel building settlements and oppressing the Palestinians is not anti-Semitic. That's how the conservatives spin it to prevent anyone from saying anything against human rights violations by Israel, because it you speak out against atrocities committed by Israel you are called anti-Semitic. Sorry, I'm not anti-Semitic, but I don't support Israel's continued oppression of the Palestinians.

The antisemtic U.N. voted Israel as the biggest violator of human rights in the world. Give me a break. The Arabs in Isrsael have it better there than they would in any Arab country. And yet, the liberals fall all over themselve defending these Arab countries. It's all rooted in antisemitism.

Give me a break. Plenty of Jewish people agree that the Israeli Government is guilty of Human Rights Violations ans International War Crimes.

Moreso the than the Arwb countries? You think the UN's decision to scapegoat Israel as the biggest violator of human rights was accurate, or should they instead have awarded that to one of the Arab countries (where women can't show their hair or go drive)? Your answer will tell me if you're an antisemite.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:It might be ridiculous but then again, what do you know about being a country that was under Israeli siege for decades.

Um, this is the Olympics where you leave politics at home. If you can't deal, go home.

In history, Lebanese are not the only ones that have been occupied. There are many others at the Olympics. But thank goodness that they don't act this way. Childish.


Thank you. I've been disgusted by how quickly the liberals on this board have turned some nasty behavior by the Lebanese into an indictment against Israel.


The verb you're looking for is 'spew'. Doesn't matter the context - any situation is a pretext to spew.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:It might be ridiculous but then again, what do you know about being a country that was under Israeli siege for decades.

Um, this is the Olympics where you leave politics at home. If you can't deal, go home.

In history, Lebanese are not the only ones that have been occupied. There are many others at the Olympics. But thank goodness that they don't act this way. Childish.


Thank you. I've been disgusted by how quickly the liberals on this board have turned some nasty behavior by the Lebanese into an indictment against Israel.


The verb you're looking for is 'spew'. Doesn't matter the context - any situation is a pretext to spew.

Yes....I've used "spew" before. Great word - and on target.

And for the liberals who think there is no correlation between being anti-Israel and the rise in antisemtisim (and who are willing to take a look at themselves), the following article, "The New Antisemitism," by Natan Sharansky might be of interest. (And to tie this in with another thread running concurrently, it is not PC to criticize Jews but it is PC to criticize Israel. It's a handy outlet for antisemites to spew their bigotry.)

http://www.jcpa.org/phas/phas-sharansky-f04.htm

jsteele
Site Admin Online
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:It might be ridiculous but then again, what do you know about being a country that was under Israeli siege for decades.

Um, this is the Olympics where you leave politics at home. If you can't deal, go home.

In history, Lebanese are not the only ones that have been occupied. There are many others at the Olympics. But thank goodness that they don't act this way. Childish.


Thank you. I've been disgusted by how quickly the liberals on this board have turned some nasty behavior by the Lebanese into an indictment against Israel.


The verb you're looking for is 'spew'. Doesn't matter the context - any situation is a pretext to spew.

Yes....I've used "spew" before. Great word - and on target.

And for the liberals who think there is no correlation between being anti-Israel and the rise in antisemtisim (and who are willing to take a look at themselves), the following article, "The New Antisemitism," by Natan Sharansky might be of interest. (And to tie this in with another thread running concurrently, it is not PC to criticize Jews but it is PC to criticize Israel. It's a handy outlet for antisemites to spew their bigotry.)

http://www.jcpa.org/phas/phas-sharansky-f04.htm



Sharansky is a proponent of settlements in the West Bank. As a government minister, he led settlement expansion and the seizure of property from Palestinians. Clearly, someone with such view will not welcome criticism of Israeli.

I'm sorry, I will criticize the construction of Israeli settlements in the occupied territories of the West Bank and East Jerusalem. If you consider that to be anti-Semitic, then I am sorry that you have reduced the term to meaninglessness. But, your labels will not stop my criticism.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:It might be ridiculous but then again, what do you know about being a country that was under Israeli siege for decades.

Um, this is the Olympics where you leave politics at home. If you can't deal, go home.

In history, Lebanese are not the only ones that have been occupied. There are many others at the Olympics. But thank goodness that they don't act this way. Childish.


Thank you. I've been disgusted by how quickly the liberals on this board have turned some nasty behavior by the Lebanese into an indictment against Israel.


The verb you're looking for is 'spew'. Doesn't matter the context - any situation is a pretext to spew.

Yes....I've used "spew" before. Great word - and on target.

And for the liberals who think there is no correlation between being anti-Israel and the rise in antisemtisim (and who are willing to take a look at themselves), the following article, "The New Antisemitism," by Natan Sharansky might be of interest. (And to tie this in with another thread running concurrently, it is not PC to criticize Jews but it is PC to criticize Israel. It's a handy outlet for antisemites to spew their bigotry.)

http://www.jcpa.org/phas/phas-sharansky-f04.htm


There is a rise of anti-Israel views. This is normal given Israel's actions. Let's face it, Israel refuses to let the U.S. use its airbases and encourages ISIS as a counter to Hamas. It is very interesting that Israel is left out of the discussion of countries that should deal with ISIS yet they are right next store. It's time for Israel to gets off its ass and earn its handouts form the U.S.
Anonymous
jsteele wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:It might be ridiculous but then again, what do you know about being a country that was under Israeli siege for decades.

Um, this is the Olympics where you leave politics at home. If you can't deal, go home.

In history, Lebanese are not the only ones that have been occupied. There are many others at the Olympics. But thank goodness that they don't act this way. Childish.


Thank you. I've been disgusted by how quickly the liberals on this board have turned some nasty behavior by the Lebanese into an indictment against Israel.


The verb you're looking for is 'spew'. Doesn't matter the context - any situation is a pretext to spew.

Yes....I've used "spew" before. Great word - and on target.

And for the liberals who think there is no correlation between being anti-Israel and the rise in antisemtisim (and who are willing to take a look at themselves), the following article, "The New Antisemitism," by Natan Sharansky might be of interest. (And to tie this in with another thread running concurrently, it is not PC to criticize Jews but it is PC to criticize Israel. It's a handy outlet for antisemites to spew their bigotry.)

http://www.jcpa.org/phas/phas-sharansky-f04.htm



Sharansky is a proponent of settlements in the West Bank. As a government minister, he led settlement expansion and the seizure of property from Palestinians. Clearly, someone with such view will not welcome criticism of Israeli.

I'm sorry, I will criticize the construction of Israeli settlements in the occupied territories of the West Bank and East Jerusalem. If you consider that to be anti-Semitic, then I am sorry that you have reduced the term to meaninglessness. But, your labels will not stop my criticism.

And you haven't made the term "Islamophobe" meaningless by tossing it out to everyone and anyone disagrees with you on the Syrian refugee situation - such as expressing concern about possible terrorist infiltration into the refugee population? Your labels will not stop my (and other) posters criticism.
post reply Forum Index » Political Discussion
Message Quick Reply
Go to: