You heard the remark, yourself, or you heard that it happened? Two very different things. |
| GDS needs to stop comparing itself to other schools. No other school has the keeping up with the jones' jones like GDS. It's a good school with a unique personality and fills a critical need. Stop worrying about other schools. |
Foreign language is very important to us. Once we decided against immersion, it didn't really matter to me whether they offered language in K or not. I like that GDS gives you a language choice at 3rd and I love the rest of the curriculum. For the record, they are considering starting language earlier, but that obviously comes at the expense of other things. I'm now pretty convinced that I'd prefer to have the current curriculum than have Spanish once or twice a week. |
Thanks. Of course I will be choosing from multiple acceptances - my child is about as good as they come . Seriously, you are absolutely correct which is why I hesitate to not see the process through because I want to maximize our options of getting into at least one of our top choices.
|
I see. In looking at the curriculum I did see certain things specifically mentioned -- like PE and Community Service -- that I don't see as part of the curriculum at other schools. |
| There is a view that foreign language at a young age is kind of useless unless its immersive. Studies shows it takes about three weeks for kids who have had no foreign language to catch up with those who have had three classes a week in elementary school. GDS, like many schools, probably has foreign language in 3rd grade to placate parents. |
Interesting. I had not heard this but can see how it might be true. |
Well, your values are not everyone's, thankfully. If you think I would "give" my child money for a house, you're out of your mind. I am giving my child an opportunity to make his life what he can. That is why I am spending now, on his education. If you're planning to buy you children houses (at the age of what, 30?), will that be to get them out of your basement? |
| It's absolutely true. At Sidwell, new 6th graders take Spanish along with the students who have had it since PK. The new kids definitely struggle at the beginning of the year -- maybe a month or two -- but by the second trimester, they are all caught up. |
| NP here. All of my kids have had Spanish for a couple of days a week from pre-K through second at their school. It was the only foreign language offered, and it has been fairly useless given the approach that was taken. It was nice to be able to choose among three different languages (Spanish, French and Chinese) when we moved to GDS for 3rd grade. |
+1. My responsibility is providing them with a good education, not a fancy wedding, a house or a trust fund for that matter...and donate it to charity? Well that's noble, but providing for my child certainly takes priority over donating money to a charity. |
What school where your children at prior to GDS? |
Sure you have every right to prioritize your children over charity. But if you can send your child to a good public school why would you spend 30k+ per year on a private school? Almost half a million dollars? It doesn't make a lot of sense to me. One of my step sons went to GDS and my other step kids went to Wilson - all of them are doing equally well in school (two in college one still in HS). |
This issue - of whether any school is worth $30k - comes up on almost every thread about private schools. For many, the issue just isn't about spending money on school instead of other things (like a trust fund, charity, or college). For others, their child wouldn't do just as well in public school because of any number of factors. And for others still, the school mission, teaching style, curriculum, etc. make it worth making other sacrifices. |
I would cut the guy some slack. He must be under a great deal of pressure. It's enough work running a large, well-regarded private school like GDS, especially one that is planning a major campus building project. It's quite another job (which perhaps he didn't sign up for) to be thrust out there as the public face and spokesman for a very controversial, major commercial development project. |