| I remember a story on 60 minutes where a mother of fraternal twins was alarmed because one of her twins was much smaller than the other. She took him to several doctors and they never found anything. It turned out that the large twin had a form of gigantism. You may want to take your daughter to an endocrinologist to rule it out. |
Not necessarily. My pediatrican has emphasized to us that frame size and muscle mass are very important factors. I posted earlier about my DD who is high %ile in both height and weight -- you wouldn't look at her and think she looks overweight. She looks, and is, very muscular. As a baby/toddler, friends and caretakers who picked her up were always surprised because she was much heavier than they expected just to look at. Weight is a complicated issue. |
|
51 lbs for that height is too much. I have a tall, big child who is muscular and big bones--who weighed a lot less at that height.
Sounds like you've got two things going. Yes, a tall big child but also one who may already be developing a weight problem while you deny it. |
Why? The weight charge are supposed to cover everyone, the entire population, some of whom are overweight. |
I'm not sure about this. Here is the methodology for the CDC growth charts: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/series/sr_11/sr11_246.pdf But in any case, by definition, 1% of healthy, non-overweight children are in the 99th percentile for weight among healthy, non-overweight children. |
| Huh. Our ped is really great about looking at both height and weight -- I would understand being concerned if your DD weren't in the upper percentile for height as well, but it sounds like she's also tall. My kids are the same way, upper percentiles for both height and weight and our ped (whom I respect immensely) wasn't concerned. Also, my DS gained 18 pounds between his 8th and 9th check-ups, but he had also gained three inches so she was unfazed. The next year he only grew 1/2 inch and hardly a pound / so she was right not to be concerned...it was a growth spurt. |
Time for a new pediatrician. You and your DD don't need that bulls***, also, she needs evidence based medicine, not prejudice. |
True, but the CDC growth charts don't just show healthy non-overweight children. The OP's child is among the heaviest 1% of all children her age. |
I just plugged my DS info on this calculator and he's considered obese on it. He's extremely tall and lean - you can see his ribs and hip bones poking out. He towers above kids several years older than he is. I brothers who are over 6'8" and they are extremely skinny. These BMI calculators are obviously missing something!! |
| My baby was ten pounds at birth. She is now 6 and 55 pounds, 53 inches. A 55 pound 3 year old who is only 42 inches tall sounds like a medical concern. Listen to your doctor. |
Or 51 pound. Same point. Your kid is way, way off the charts. Why are you resisting dealing with it? |
Op's kid is way more heavy than tall. |
Or maybe you typed in the numbers wrong. |
NP. No, they are notoriously bad at gauging the approximate size of people who are "dense." A million years ago when I was thin, my BMI still said I was overweight. My doctor just said some people are heavier and she said she would have guessed I weighed 10-15 pounds less than I did. (Now I'm just straight up obese now matter how I measure it!) |
Are you Asian? |