|
I disagree with the person who says camps should include everyone and it gives the wrong message if they don't. I'm sure you would feel that way UNTIL a child harmed your child or threatened your child. Then it becomes "how DARE you let THAT child stay at the camp and jeopardize the safety of MY child.
Parents need to be completely transparent so the camp can figure out if they can handle an issue or not. If there are any aggressive tendencies (beyond say age 3 or 4) then offer to send a shadow and be honest. Not saying OP wasn't honest. Just wondering how we can help OP prevent future issues with camps. Offer to introduce your child prior to the decision and have them talk to any professionals working with your child who can describe the issues and offer suggestions if your child is accepted. |
Do you mind sharing the name of the great second camp? |
Oakwood |
I'm sorry, OP. That seems like a really lame explanation. This might be one of those "silver lining" type things. Unless you were knowingly hiding a medical condition, they just don't seem like a solid camp that is able to handle any variables at all. I realize not every camp can be expected to handle certain medical/behavioral issues, but the reality is that when dealing with kids, stuff can just happen, and a good camp should be able to roll with it. |
| If a child presents a safety risk or cannot cope with a day of camp, this may be the reason. Most camps don't provide one-to-one care, which some children need. We recently had a five-year-old at our camp who, without one-to-one care, would have fallen in the creek or got into serious difficulty. His leader had to be on him constantly and neglected the rest of her group, which wasn't fair to the kids in her group. Some children are not ready for camp, but parents send them anyway for respite. Camp is not a daycare. Children need to be able to navigate a day of camp without much intervention. |
|
OP, sorry for this experience. Not every camp can support every need. Have you disclosed SN to the camp ahead of time and discussed what works and what doesn't work for your child in terms of supports and behavior management? Have they agreed to what you proposed? Why is the teacher proposing X approach they are implementing? Supposedly this teacher doesn't know your child well, so as a parent you should be guiding them.
It sounds that in the end your child needed more support than they were able to provide. It happens. My child needs a 1:1 despite being fairly high functioning, most camps can't provide it or charge double. It's tough but it's also understandable. |
Do you think if a camp director said that to the parents of an injured child that would be acceptable? Every boy doesn’t enjoy roughhousing and there are times where it is not appropriate. You can supervise roughhousing amongst your children and drive your children to the ER with broken bones. |
|
I'm sorry this happened but your lack of concern for the other children impacted is really shocking.
I'm surprised you seem to feel so entitled and upset when the issue is AGGRESSION. There should be zero tolerance for aggression. |
OP did you not disclose the medical issue beforehand? I'm really skeptical that's the true reason behind them kicking your child out. It sounds like they couldn't deal with the roughhousing and then made up an excuse when confronted. They don't really kick a child out for a non-behavioral medical condition that you disclosed. |
| You don't mention diagnoses or that you spoke with the camp about it beforehand to make sure they could handle your child's needs. |
| This is a 10 year old thread. |
| THIS IS A 10 YEAR OLD THREAD |