Does anyone else get the pig guy and the newly engaged guy (rapist's boss) confused? There are too many characters like that and ridiculous that they are ALL in love with Mary.
Who will kill the valet? Bates? Mrs Hughes? Anna? Mary? |
They've got that bastard by the balls, so no need to kill, really. But if he turns up dead and Bates has a solid alibi THEN it could be interesting. |
I think Mrs Hughes will be in on killing the rapist, or at least the mastermind of a cover-up. I can hardly keep myself from googling it! |
I don't think this is out of character at all, especially now. Perhaps at the start of the series, when she was younger and thought the world operated in a certain way. But now she's seen that great estates fall-- even her beloved Downton was at risk-- and young, healthy, happy people with everything to live for die. She's matured and become-- I don't want to say cynical-- realistic, perhaps. That fact that she's sided with Tom against her father with respect to the future of Downton and its solvency shows that she sees the world is changing, and she must and will change with it. Plus, Mary has a backbone of steel. She'll do whatever is needed in any situation. She is completely competent and has too healthy of an ego to worry that something might be "beneath" her. I think by definition, anything she does is appropriate and called for. Those pigs are going to save Downton. That's all she needed to recognize in order to get her feet muddy and water them. |
Mary, Anna and Mrs Hughes are going to do a Mr Pamuk on the rapist |
I agree with PPs that it's not out of character with Mary to get into the pig trouth (omg how do you spell that?) if her beloved estate is endangered.
However she would have taken her gloves off first or something--I think they would have undressed more. Or maybe that's just me thinking that because I do the laundry in the house… re "It's not like I'm going to find another Earl's daughter to marry,"--to PP who asked why Tom wouldn't marry Mary; I think Tom and Mary aren't in love, that's why. I mean Mary and Sybil were very different. Anyways but Tom and Edith would be logical because it would not be for love; it would be Tom helping Edith out of a really bad situation. Ok I have an idea. How's this? Edith's lover has gone AWOL because he's actually a spy--but a spy for ENGLAND and the Germans caught and imprisoned him and that's why he's incommunicado. He will conveniently reappear after Edith has married Tom. |
The only unbelievable part of this episode was Mary making eggs in the kitchen. As if! |
Yes! How does she know how to do that when there a many people going off to college who don't know how to boil water or make spaghetti? |
no no no I think she does know how to make eggs…I think in one of the prior seasons someone taught her to make eggs. Didn't she make eggs for Matthew? Someone help me to remember. Didn't someone downstairs teach Mary to make eggs? |
Sybil spent some time in the kitchen a few seasons ago. |
That seems believable! I can see the writers doing that. Thomas would never do anything so noble as to kill a rapist. |
Mary did scramble eggs for Matthew. I think Mrs. Patmore taught her how to do it.
I loved the scene of Mary and Mr. Blake getting down and dirty with the pigs. I can't believe Julian Fallowes is going to have Mary snag someone else's fiancé again. Remember they have to kill off Matthew's fiancée, Livinia Squires (Sp?) so that Matthew could marry Mary. Will they kill off Mabel so that Mary can marry Lord Gillingham. I hope not. They need some non-blueblood blood in the family (Cora doesn't count), so Mr. Blake would be perfect. Gillingham is only after her money and Mr. Blake (what is the guy's first name?) will figure that out. |