Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
I actually don't see anything THAT wrong with what OP did. It wasn't graceful, but to me MIL sounds like a jealous teenager throwing a hissy fit. She didn't do the work, but she wants a lot of credit.
OP, you meant well, but it misfired. Just apologize for her hurt feelings and let it go. The only way this is going to get better is if you just let it go and she lets it go.
Um, no. You are almost as clueless as OP. The MIL wasn't throwing a hissy fit because she didn't do any work and wants credit. She was upset because OP singled out some family members who helped them, thereby setting up a two-tier system of the "good relatives" vs the "bad relatives" and designated who was which in an inappropriate forum sent out to all family members. There was no reason to do this other than to set a standard by which the good relatives are determined by how much time and money they lavish on the spoiled entitled family and letting the bad relatives know that this birthday was their chance to up the ante and move from bad relative to good relative. Pretty crass and boorish. Why not just issue a cover charge for the birthday invitation and say that anyone that cannot pay will not be invited over again without gratuitous insults. This is essentially what she's done, but she's tried to be covert and blame the MIL for exposing her as a gold-digger.
You have been raised in the "everybody gets a trophy" period. She thanked the people that helped her. That isn't setting up a tier system. It's thanking the people who were helpful. If you weren't helping, you don't get credit or thanks. You didn't earn it. The timing and place was weird, but her thanks was not. If MIL perceives herself as "singled out," and was embarrassed, maybe she should help out more in the future.
Thanking MIL for help that she didn't give would be 1) false and 2) butt-kissing. MIL sounds like a holy terror. I'd apologize to keep the peace and then avoid the bish as much as possible.
PP,, no I was not. I was raised in the you earned a trophy when you do well period. I think it's ridiculous to award attendance. Publicly declaring those people who were helpful BEFORE the event is setting up the tier system. If you can't see the difference between thanking family and friends after some event or at some milestone vs thanking them when inviting them to an event where traditionally gifts are given, then I reiterate that you are almost as clueless as OP. She set the standard by which she would measure the family for the upcoming birthday party, essentially telling them that if they didn't deliver the goods in birthday gifts, that they would be lower class family members. That's just crass.
What she should do is thank the helpful family members directly and in private. Making public declarations of your appreciation to a subset of your audience when not all of them contributed equally, and highlighting how they contributed unequally is obnoxiously rude. If she sent out a normal birthday invitation, then sent out a group thank you after the party, noting those people who contributed extra effort and time, that would be different. It would still be inappropriate to send it publically, but then many of us would feel like you did that it was a minor faux pas.
Sending all this out on the invitations for the upcoming birthday party is masking an obnoxious gift grab and challenging the less helpful family members to do better for better recognition[i].