Man is unapologetic about fathering 22 children by 14 different women

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:from a primal perspective, this guy is pure ALPHA.

Totally. I think he impregnated me by me just watching the video of his interview....

[Anonymous]

I think it is sick and he should bed fixed, should have been long ago. He will never support those children financial or emotionally. Those women are idiots too.

[Anonymous]

Here's an interesting article about other men who have a plethora of children.

http://globalgrind.com/news/crazy-stories-about-men-with-over-10-kids-list

I find it interesting, not that George Foreman has 12 kids, but because he named all 5 of his sons George. What the these brothers call each other? I guess maybe they go by their middle names...


Ziona Chana has them all beat though, with 94 children by 39 women.

http://globalgrind.com/news/crazy-stories-about-men-with-over-10-kids-list

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Here's an interesting article about other men who have a plethora of children.

http://globalgrind.com/news/crazy-stories-about-men-with-over-10-kids-list

I find it interesting, not that George Foreman has 12 kids, but because he named all 5 of his sons George. What the these brothers call each other? I guess maybe they go by their middle names...


Ziona Chana has them all beat though, with 94 children by 39 women.

http://globalgrind.com/news/crazy-stories-about-men-with-over-10-kids-list

that's a great link. Thanks for sharing. I remember seeing the clip of the Jets player on The Soup.

I didn't realize Evander had that many kids.

They didn't mention how many baby mommas George Foreman has. Anyone know?

The guy in India must be in some sort of Indian form of cult that allows for multiple wives. What makes him so special that 30+ women married him?

[Anonymous]

here's the wiki entry on george's kids - very little info about moms, but it does give the nicknames for all the baby georges-

Foreman has 12 children. His 5 sons are George Jr., George III ("Monk"), George IV ("Big Wheel"), George V ("Red"), and George VI("Little Joey"). The 2 daughters from his marriage are Natalia and Leola; his 3 daughters from a separate relationship are Michi, Freeda, and Georgetta. He adopted a daughter, Isabella Brandie Lilja (Foreman), in 2009[citation needed]; and another, Courtney Isaac (Foreman), in 2012.

[Anonymous]

And these women couldn't keep their legs closed or use protection because?

[Anonymous]

yes, it takes 2 to tango - we all know this.

Surely most of them knew about each other, and he fathered multiple kids with several of them, obviously.

But, again, it isn't the kids' fault their parents are morons.

ALL of them need to be thinking about whether or not they can actually provide for/afford those kids. Clearly he just wants to spread his seed and thinks it is the state's responsibility to care for his kids.

[Anonymous]

Yall are weird. Do none of you know who George Foreman is? Isn't a man living off government funding! ha ha ha. And all of his sons have the same first, middle, and last name- followed by Jr., III, IV, V, & VI.

[Anonymous]

The title of this thread should be changed. This is not a man, he is an animal.

[Anonymous]

Idiocracy is real.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:yes, it takes 2 to tango - we all know this.

Surely most of them knew about each other, and he fathered multiple kids with several of them, obviously.

But, again, it isn't the kids' fault their parents are morons.

ALL of them need to be thinking about whether or not they can actually provide for/afford those kids. Clearly he just wants to spread his seed and thinks it is the state's responsibility to care for his kids.

This. But that's what we get for government funded parenting which is what this guy and his sperm are receiving. Think about it, we're all kind a related to them, lol. Years ago I was at a charity event in my DS's community (a crab feast fundraiser) which was very casual and family style seating. People rotated about the tables socializing and catching up (a lot of us grew up near each other) and at some point one of my DS's neighbor and her daughter sat across from me and started chatting me up. They were both very excited because the daughter (unemployed) met her boyfriend (a CVS clerk who dropped out of high school) a few months before and was now pregnant with twins! Twins! I was shocked but kept my cool and asked her how they were planning to support the babies? Government, government, government - every other word out of her and mother's mouth was about the freebies they would get for each child and how excited they were for all the help. The master plan was the happy young couple would move in with the daughter's mom and dad and grandma and grandpa were so lucky to have the kids living with them, have not idea how that worked out and don't want to know. Back to the conversation at the crab feast, I asked the daughter, not the mother, where she thought the money for those freebies came from? The mother jumped in to answer and I politely told her I was asking her daughter and to but out. The daughter's response was the government. When I explained to her that the money the government spends was received from all of this lovely hardworking people sitting in this room around her who get up and go to work every single day and pay their taxes she was shocked. She truly had no idea how government was funded and guess what she did not care, not one iota. I could not sit there any longer with her ignorant mother who had set her own daughter and grandchildren up for failure, unwittingly or not. I did ask her to thank me and my husband for supporting her unborn children and then offered to pay for birth control so she could properly plan in the future. I was not invited back to the next crab feast. Oh well...

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I take issue with the premise of the subject line. It seems to suggest he should be apologizing.

He should. First to his kids, who he cannot possibly parent well. And second to taxpayers, who are paying the price for his total lack of responsibility.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:And these women couldn't keep their legs closed or use protection because?

That is not what this post is about.

I think most DCUM readers know how reproduction works.

This discussion focuses on one shockingly irresponsible man, not a series of women who could have chosen better.

But misogynists always going to blame the women, which is just so Republican.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:yes, it takes 2 to tango - we all know this.

Surely most of them knew about each other, and he fathered multiple kids with several of them, obviously.

But, again, it isn't the kids' fault their parents are morons.

ALL of them need to be thinking about whether or not they can actually provide for/afford those kids. Clearly he just wants to spread his seed and thinks it is the state's responsibility to care for his kids.

I wouldn't assume they all knew about each other. Some yes but some no. It doesn't take away from their stupidity -- a major reason not to have kids with a man outside marriage is that getting married is a legal hurdle that can make it harder (not impossible but harder) for a man to conceal the fact that he has other family obligations. By choosing to have kids with a man without that attachment you risk your kids' well being.

I don't know what the solution is here. A lot of the proposed solutions seem like stuff that could be abused or used against people who are NOT doing this which makes me nervous.

I do think this is a fairly rare problem. Perhaps I'm wrong. It does make me angry on behalf of society that has to care for these kids and also on behalf of the kids who got pulled into the world by idiots.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Crazy. I hope the kids can break the cycle of poverty and stupidity.

The stats on that are pretty grim. His legacy is a bunch of kids in prison uniforms named Shaw.